Now that we're all thinking outside the "box" design, how about a Power Pyramid shape?

Now that we're all thinking outside the "box" design, how about a Power Pyramid shape?
Hilarious! But please, do not let Apple see that! In their current state of being unable to mention that the emperor is naked, some committee might get a hold of that and decide to run with it
You might be thinking of Silicon GraphicsAnd I could have sworn Apollo Computer's desk-side workstations in the mid-to-late 1980s were vaguely pyramidal in shape, but I can't find any images of such a thing so my memory must be failing.
Isn't this a vacuum cleaner?You might be thinking of Silicon GraphicsView attachment 759450
... and still they made the base unit of the old "lamp" iMac (nearly) a half-globe. And it still looks better than more recent incarnations from competitors with a square base unit. "Looks" is a very important factor for a significant portion of Apple customers.
Apple admitted that they boxed themselves into a corner with the Mac Pro Cylinder. So, they will not be using that again, ever. Instant Classic.
Apple admitted that they boxed themselves into a corner with the Mac Pro Cylinder. So, they will not be using that again, ever. Instant Classic.
... and I would love to get one for collector reasons, if only the price wouldn't be so high. On the other hand: Apple's only in a corner when you think of a true powerhouse a.k.a. MacPro. For a mini the cylinder would have lots of headroom, both size- and temperaturewise. You could even say it'd be total overkill for a Mac mini. For a decent headless desktop on the other hand ... ;-) *scnr*Apple admitted that they boxed themselves into a corner with the Mac Pro Cylinder. So, they will not be using that again, ever. Instant Classic.
Neither are the modern components you mentioned - they're just of lower height. And a modern mini "Sphere" could well have a small size of - say - 4" diameter or less.That was back when HDDs and optical drives were a thing, those aren’t flat.
As we talk about re-purposing housing: Why not re-purpose the housing of the last Airport Extreme? Nice looks (like it better than the current AppleTV), sufficient room inside for modern components, unobtrusive.Apple can re-purpose the Mac Pro trashcan as the Apple Homepod Pro (tm).
Why not re-purpose the housing of the last Airport Extreme? Nice looks (like it better than the current AppleTV), sufficient room inside for modern components, unobtrusive.
LOL, I truly did not think anyone would catch thatI see what you did there.
I'm also hoping for this weeks lottery numbers and for my doctor to recommend I eat more steak and chips for health reasons.I somehow hope the new Mac Pro will have plenty of BTO and start at a low price. So everyone can configure a system to their needs.
Depends on how much configurability the 'modular' pro is.With the current Mac Pro starting at $3000, I don't see how we could expect to pay any less for the new version - especially considering the $5000 price of the entry level iMac Pro.
Depends on how much configurability the 'modular' pro is.
With the current Mac Pro starting at $3000, I don't see how we could expect to pay any less for the new version
I'm also hoping for this weeks lottery numbers and for my doctor to recommend I eat more steak and chips for health reasons.![]()
If a MP with dual FirePro GPUs costs $3000, then a single FirePro should lower the cost, and a single consumer GPU should lower the cost further.
If a MP with dual FirePro GPUs costs $3000, then a single FirePro should lower the cost, and a single consumer GPU should lower the cost further.
Looks more like this thread.How about this design for a modular Mac mini? View attachment 759564
Even if they use "off-the shelf" 16x PCIe video cards, considering the iMac Pro has AMD Vegas, I would expect those would be what the Mac Pro offers at a minimum. If they also offer nVidia, we're probably talking Quadro versions of the 1070 and 1080 and Quadro cards are a fair bit more expensive than the consumer models.