Lol, I love it how some people actually think refurbs are better than BRAND NEW machines.
Don't be cheap and buy a new one. If you work at McDonald's for $200 a month, then that's a different story.
Thanks for signing up today just to post this ignorant comment. Hopefully, you'll log off this site and forget your password, never to be seen on MacRumors again. But, you probably won't. Something's got to satisfy your "troll" gene. Thanks also for providing poster-board material for Windows fanboys. It's this type of elitist attitude by a very small percentage of Apple users that creates blind hatred for the brand.
FWIW, I have purchased several refurbished Apple products. Numerous iPods, 1st-gen iPod Touch, Mid-2009 MacBook Pro, Airport Extreme, and 2011 iMac i7 3.4. I have never had an issue with any of them. Every one of them is still running good-as-new today.
There have been misconceptions on both sides of the argument in this thread. The fact is that refurbs are as reliable (not more or less) as new machines. If they weren't, Apple wouldn't offer the same warranty as they do on their new products. It's expensive for a company to warranty a product. Why would they give the same warranty on a product that they knew was more prone to failure? And, why would they offer those higher-failure products at a reduced price? That would be a double hit to their bottom line which is something, we all know, Apple would never tolerate.
Last edited: