Because of the case's design, something (Ethernet or one of the USB ports) would have to have been sacrificed for FireWire (because the K-slot is designed to align with the rear panel latch).
Because of the case's design, something (Ethernet or one of the USB ports) would have to have been sacrificed for FireWire (because the K-slot is designed to align with the rear panel latch).
No the real reason was to make "pros" (as SJ referred to 'them') to opt for the MBP. Simple as that...
That's not a valid reason. Design should follow function, not the reverse.
Heck, a FW port in the back would be better than no FW at all!
It's Apple... so it's reversed.![]()
IMHO I would of prefered it if the ethernet port was sacrificed instead of the Firewire port.
And that's why I have still not upgraded from my Cube.
the cube, ah yes, the embodiment of function over form. not a thing vain about it
That's not a valid reason. Design should follow function, not the reverse.
Heck, a FW port in the back would be better than no FW at all!
Even if that is true I would have preferred them to drop one of the USB ports.
What kind of submissive attitude is that? Gigabit ethernet is ESSENTIAL for network backups.
Even if that is true I would have preferred them to drop one of the USB ports. I have never used both at once, and if I did require it, there are small external hubs that can be easily used. But I do use Firewire for target disk mode and that's somewhat important to me.
I don't think we'll be seeing FireWire returning to the regular MacBooks, especially once the White is dropped.
I would agree that once gone it is probably gone for good. But you never know - by your argument, if the next major revision leaves enough space on the board maybe they will put it back. And then say they responded to customer input.![]()
If Apple decided to support IEEE 1394c, FireWire 800 in the MacBook would be possible without any modification of the case.Because of the case's design, something (Ethernet or one of the USB ports) would have to have been sacrificed for FireWire (because the K-slot is designed to align with the rear panel latch).
It's Apple... so it's reversed.![]()
If Apple decided to support IEEE 1394c, FireWire 800 in the MacBook would be possible without any modification of the case.