Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

butterfly0fdoom

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 17, 2007
847
0
Camp Snoopy
qFsHP2uMXoMCagVy.large

AUZYBwBSf4DGQiru.large


Because of the case's design, something (Ethernet or one of the USB ports) would have to have been sacrificed for FireWire (because the K-slot is designed to align with the rear panel latch).
 
Because of the case's design, something (Ethernet or one of the USB ports) would have to have been sacrificed for FireWire (because the K-slot is designed to align with the rear panel latch).

Even if that is true I would have preferred them to drop one of the USB ports. I have never used both at once, and if I did require it, there are small external hubs that can be easily used. But I do use Firewire for target disk mode and that's somewhat important to me.
 
It is quite amazing how little there actually is, inside the MacBook. Very clever people with some fantastic idea's at Apple, unfortunately, its way out of my price range for the foreseeable future.
 
That's not a valid reason. Design should follow function, not the reverse.
Heck, a FW port in the back would be better than no FW at all!
 
No the real reason was to make "pros" (as SJ referred to 'them') to opt for the MBP. Simple as that...
 
No the real reason was to make "pros" (as SJ referred to 'them') to opt for the MBP. Simple as that...

What if the majority (90%) of laptops (about 150-200) bought for users at a company are macbooks, and they have always used firewire to transfer a user from their old computer to the new one in less than half hour? From mac to mac that is.

I'll have to ask the IT department here at work what they think about them. I'm guessing they wont be happy.
 
IMHO I would of prefered it if the ethernet port was sacrificed instead of the Firewire port. The Firewire port is important to me for my video production and music and audio recording. This is the reason why I will not upgrade my macbook for the latest model aswell as it being £200 more expensive.


Artmuzz
 
That's not a valid reason. Design should follow function, not the reverse.
Heck, a FW port in the back would be better than no FW at all!

True that. Damn, can't buy this thing without firewire.
 
What kind of submissive attitude is that? Gigabit ethernet is ESSENTIAL for network backups.

The so called submissive attitude is that for £200 extra you would expect all the ports that was on the old Macbook. I'm certainly pissed with Apple if they expect me to throw away my digital camera and FW Audio interface and spend £200 more just to have the latest Macbook. I was all set in updating my Macbook too...oh well never mind:(

Artmuzz
 
Even if that is true I would have preferred them to drop one of the USB ports. I have never used both at once, and if I did require it, there are small external hubs that can be easily used. But I do use Firewire for target disk mode and that's somewhat important to me.

I do agree that would have been a much better idea.

But my point is that, while differentiating the MB and the MBP further may have been a contributing factor, physical limitations seems to be another reason why Apple took out FireWire (that and my belief that nowadays it's useless to "normal" people [as in not the people that would post on here]; as I said in the other thread about FireWire, a lot of people (especially those that don't deal with DV camcorders, which is closer to being the majority) don't even know what it is, let alone what it's used for, thus, under that basis, making FireWire more expendable than the second USB port). Unless a USB port were sacrificed (because I doubt Ethernet will be sacrificed on any non-Air portables) or unless Apple implements FW S800T in a later revision, I don't think we'll be seeing FireWire returning to the regular MacBooks, especially once the White is dropped.
 
I would agree that once gone it is probably gone for good. But you never know - by your argument, if the next major revision leaves enough space on the board maybe they will put it back. And then say they responded to customer input. ;)

Just look at the inside of the casing. Something has to be given up for a FireWire port (Apple's hinge design prevents it from being on the back) as the ports (including MagSafe and the K-Slot) take up the entire left side of the MacBook that's availiable because of the hard drive. Unless Apple changes the battery latch so that it's not aligned with the K-Slot, there's nowhere that Apple could place a FireWire port.

I still think using FW S800T is the best alternative. I think Apple should have gone that route from the start, actually, instead of implementing it as a Rev. B addition.
 
You would, and so would the vast majority of people on this forum. But remember, more people out there than on this forum. And I've seen way too many people trying to jam flash drives into FireWire ports. (I'm just trying to be a voice of reason here)
 
It's Apple... so it's reversed. :apple:

You can just imagine the conversation:
Designers: "Steve, we're going to have to add 1/2" to the depth of the MacBook or else we can't physically fit in the firewire port"

Jobs: "I refuse to compromise on the aesthetic beauty of the MacBook. The FireWire has to go. I'm sure no-one will mind too much because it makes the machine look so much sleeker"
:D
 
I really feel your pain

I am a PC user, and even my piece of cr^p of a Dell laptop that I admit s^cks has a firewire port. I've only used once with a friend's camcorder, but it's there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.