Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Didn't the Rev A have overheating problems that weren't entirely fixed until they changed out the 21W TDP chip for a 17W TDP chip? My memory is fuzzy, but I think that's the way it went down. If so, it makes me skeptical about being about to dissipate 25W of heat...

The current MBA has a total of 29W TDP including the chipset/GPU 12W and CPU 17W. With Intel, the drop would be 4W TDP... except when dedicated graphics running in hybrid mode with Optimus is using the dedicated Nvidia graphics (the 310m seems like the right card). That solution would give us about 25% more graphics performance when the dedicated card is on, and when it's not on, the Intel IGP would handle basic graphics tasks.

Another possibility is getting a chip without the 45nm GMA die, or Apple can turn off the Intel IGP. A dedicated card is going to add more than 12W, but there are always new alternative technologies. I don't know what the savings of power is for turning off the IGP, but I would assume with Apple wanting to save power, Apple would use Optimus to get performance when needed and battery savings when not needed.

The original MBA had a 21W Merom CPU, while the v 2,1 MBA has the 17W TDP. There was some heat savings there, but also remember the current MBA's CPU is throttled. We simply don't know what Apple can do with cooling, but I don't want an overheated MBA nor do I want an MBA that doesn't have a capable GPU. This is why I would gladly stick it out with the same CPU in the MBA for this update. It could give Apple more time to prepare a worthy graphics solution that will work across entire Mac lineup (minus Mac Pro).
 
Ok it's Tuesday past noon and no update . . . looks like another week of waiting. Seriously this is getting ridiculous. It's been 281 days
 
Ok it's Tuesday past noon and no update . . . looks like another week of waiting. Seriously this is getting ridiculous. It's been 281 days

I think it's a bad idea to bet on an MBA update when the iPad is in the pipeline.
 
Is there any absolute NEED you have for a new revision?
Well, if he had to make a purchase decision soon, then I can understand his NEED.

Right now, imo, the 13" MBP (with SSD) absolutely blows the current MBA right out of the water on virtually every count, including the critical battery life. The only advantage for the MBA is just 1.5 lbs less hefty. Frankly, I cannot see any justification in purchasing the MBA right now.

That means the only choice is to wait for the next revision, which I expect to be substantial, since the 13" MBP is breathing down the MBA's back and is also due for an improvement.
 
If I had to buy a computer right now, there is no way I would waste the money on an outdated MBA. With 2 GB of RAM it's forever stuck in the past. A year ago it was acceptable, but it's no longer even close to acceptable. It is too far behind the competitors. I would much prefer a Sony Vaio Z over an MBA if I had to buy right now.

At this point, it seems far less likely that it would be released with an iPad release so soon. However, there were rumors about an update today, and I sorta suckered into those thoughts because two weeks before the iPhone was released, the Macs got updates. Now, who knows? April? Definitely expect new designs and Apple to show them off? Could it be a media presentation in April or May? Why not just wait until June for WWDC?

This is no fun for certain... I am sick of it, and I figured I would only be using this 2,1 for six months. I want more in the terms of RAM. I want to be able to run Windows 7 in a virtual machine. I want other updates for waiting this long too. I don't care about Core i7, as a C2D would be just as well. The MBA has been essentially exactly the same since October 2008, which is more than absurd.
 
If I had to buy a computer right now, there is no way I would waste the money on an outdated MBA. With 2 GB of RAM it's forever stuck in the past. A year ago it was acceptable, but it's no longer even close to acceptable. It is too far behind the competitors. I would much prefer a Sony Vaio Z over an MBA if I had to buy right now.

At this point, it seems far less likely that it would be released with an iPad release so soon. However, there were rumors about an update today, and I sorta suckered into those thoughts because two weeks before the iPhone was released, the Macs got updates. Now, who knows? April? Definitely expect new designs and Apple to show them off? Could it be a media presentation in April or May? Why not just wait until June for WWDC?

This is no fun for certain... I am sick of it, and I figured I would only be using this 2,1 for six months. I want more in the terms of RAM. I want to be able to run Windows 7 in a virtual machine. I want other updates for waiting this long too. I don't care about Core i7, as a C2D would be just as well. The MBA has been essentially exactly the same since October 2008, which is more than absurd.

Interesting .. I run a VM, Word, Flock, Firefox, Adium, and iChat simultaneously on my Air with NO issues. I hardly consider that to be 'unacceptable'.
 
I found this waiting frustrating, I have a rev A with runcore ssd and I started to feel tight.

Probably the actual MBA would be already enough for my today's need but since I tend to keep my laptop for a LONG time, I just cannot accept to buy such an old design machine.

8 GB of RAM and bigger SSD are the minimum acceptable upgrade alongside some minor design retouch like tighter and stronger hinges (I simply cannot live with the scare of them giving up in any moment)

An update in GPU and CPU would be nice as well, like an extended battery life that on "eco" mode should be able to pass the 8 h
 
Interesting .. I run a VM, Word, Flock, Firefox, Adium, and iChat simultaneously on my Air with NO issues. I hardly consider that to be 'unacceptable'.

Simple, you're a fanboi. I am too, but I stopped making excuses for Apple's products being so far behind, or below, the competition. If you're really happy running the MINIMUM RAM for each OS, that's your business. I would find it disgusting trying to run OS X alone with any less RAM being allocated for Windows. To run Windows 7 and OS X 10.6, one needs 4 GB of RAM. Sure there are people running servers and doing crazy things with their MBA, but I find running OS X challenging enough with 2 GB of RAM in 2010.

The bottom line is there is no excuse for Apple having its products positioned so far behind its competitors, as it is right now, IN REGARDS TO THE MACS. Anyone that doesn't see it is a fanboi... and is blinded by Sir Jobs and mute to his every word. I love my MBA, but there is NO EXCUSE, in 2010, to have every Mac except the iMac positioned so far behind and below its competitors. It needs an update to every Mac except the iMac (and even needs one there with its low-end version).

Why doesn't Apple want to compete at the top? Why is it so happy with 5% share of the computer market? Apple needs to either actually dominate the high-end market with premium, relevant (which definitely requires current) products, that makes its customers feel they get exactly what they pay for with Macs. Right now, Apple has even its core Mac fan base upset with it. The MacBook Pro is the worst value the MBP has ever been, because it's so very far behind the competition with a sixteen month old graphics system and even shared RAM in its 13" models. There is nothing PRO about the current MacBook PRO. The MBA, while revolutionary when it was introduced, is quickly becoming irrelevant with competitors boasting 8 GB of RAM, hybrid graphics systems, triple the battery life, and Windows 7. The bottom line is system RAM is more important than Apple deemed it, and 2 GB is no longer relevant if it's trying to be a primary Mac doing great things.

I am getting to the point where there just isn't any reason to do this anymore. I am willing to pay Apple a lot of money to make the Mac I really want, and I am a disappointed AAPL shareholder knowing that Apple, Inc. isn't keeping its Mac customers happy. Apple needs to decide if it's going to do Macs right and keep them a fair value for the substantial premium and luxury costs, or tell its customers that it only cares about iPad, iPod, and iPhone sales. Right now, there are only two Macs people should even consider buying... one is a WhiteBook and the other is the iMac. I guess Apple is selling a lot of iMacs for sales to be acceptable with Pro Macs that are nine plus months old each. People aren't getting what they're paying for, and that is a huge problem. When people buy Macs, they justify the costs in their head, because they're normally getting what the expect to be the best computer available for the job. The problem is OS X alone isn't winning that battle anymore, so Apple needs to keep its Macs current and relevant.

I am a disappointed Apple Computer fan, and I feel that my AAPL stock would be a lot more valuable if Apple, Inc. kept its products current and relevant. If updates came every six months, that would be acceptable. But to see thousands of posts daily in the MBP threads reading that people are buying Vaio Zs and other PCs because they're sick of waiting for an update, and they realize that OS X has lost its edge over Windows with version 7. If anyone finds the current situation acceptable, I have to wonder why given the age of technology we're in, and the desire for pros, prosumers, and enthusiasts to spend money but they cannot with their favorite company because it doesn't update its products in a timely fashion. The bottom line is Apple fans aren't getting what they're paying for with year old Mac Pros, nearly ten month old MBPs and MBAs, nine month old iPhones, and seven month old iPods. No other company could do what Apple is doing, and what Apple is doing is killing its Mac and OS X brands all in the name of the iPad.

I am frustrated, and no 2 GB of RAM isn't acceptable in 2010. Remember that your MBA is sharing 256 MB of RAM to the GPU, and has LESS THAN 1 GB for each OS remaining isn't acceptable for a virtual machine environment between OS X 10.6 and Windows 7. These are the two current OSes and they have less than their required minimums each when one factors in the fact that 256 MB is being used by the GPU. Not acceptable and there is no excuse.
 
At this point, it seems far less likely that it would be released with an iPad release so soon. However, there were rumors about an update today, and I sorta suckered into those thoughts because two weeks before the iPhone was released, the Macs got updates. Now, who knows? April? Definitely expect new designs and Apple to show them off? Could it be a media presentation in April or May? Why not just wait until June for WWDC?
.

One other point. The iPad is only being released in 1 country on the 3rd of April, the other 200ish are later on, a handful at the end of April and more at some other undisclosed date. The US makes up less than 1/2 of Apples revenue now.

There's always something going on at Apple, and it's too big of a company to shut down for months at a time while one single product is rolled out.
 
Why doesn't Apple want to compete at the top?

Depending on how you measure "top" they may be already. Apple has the distinction of making nearly 6 times the Operating Margin of Dell, and 3 times that of HP. Check out the lower graph here:

http://www.appleinsider.com/article..._for_25_of_global_desktop_growth_in_2010.html

While I agree with you that the current offerings are for the most part stale, or in some cases even worse, the financial results tell another story.

Apple, and in particular Apple share holders are enjoying the ride that they've been on the past few years.

Like you, I hope they don't kill the goose that is laying the golden eggs for them, and begin to strike a better balance between corporate greed and reasonable offerings to customers.
 
Like you, I hope they don't kill the goose that is laying the golden eggs for them, and begin to strike a better balance between corporate greed and reasonable offerings to customers.

Corporate greed and the associated lack of innovation, or even worse, lack of progress makes people move to the competition. Everybody has a limit and Apple is pushing the limit further and further past peoples comfort zone. (except perhaps the devote fanboi whos limit is lightyears away)

I give them until the end of June to release a CONSIDERABLY improved MBA or I'll get the Vaio Z instead.
 
Corporate greed and the associated lack of innovation, or even worse, lack of progress makes people move to the competition. Everybody has a limit and Apple is pushing the limit further and further past peoples comfort zone. (except perhaps the devote fanboi whos limit is lightyears away)

I give them until the end of June to release a CONSIDERABLY improved MBA or I'll get the Vaio Z instead.

That is an incredibly insightful post. Apple is definitely pushing the limits... especially with its MBPs. I am with you, as I will be switching to the Sony Vaio Z if I don't get a completely capable MBA very soon.

To further clarify my position, if the update to the MBA includes an Arrandale CPU, it must have an ATI or Nvidia graphics solution, or I will be leaving the MBA. I cannot accept Intel's GMA IGP as my sole graphics solution. I am fine with using it in a hybrid situation where it can save battery power, but I am not going back to pre-2008 graphics in 2010... just like I am not going back to pre-2009 RAM with less than 4 GB of RAM in 2010.

The next MBA absolutely has to have an Nvidia/ATI graphics card AND 4 GB of RAM. I can work with the rest, but those are absolute requirements.
 
That is an incredibly insightful post. Apple is definitely pushing the limits... especially with its MBPs. I am with you, as I will be switching to the Sony Vaio Z if I don't get a completely capable MBA very soon.

To further clarify my position, if the update to the MBA includes an Arrandale CPU, it must have an ATI or Nvidia graphics solution, or I will be leaving the MBA. I cannot accept Intel's GMA IGP as my sole graphics solution. I am fine with using it in a hybrid situation where it can save battery power, but I am not going back to pre-2008 graphics in 2010... just like I am not going back to pre-2009 RAM with less than 4 GB of RAM in 2010.

The next MBA absolutely has to have an Nvidia/ATI graphics card AND 4 GB of RAM. I can work with the rest, but those are absolute requirements.

I am more and more geting worried that Apple is leaving the core business and is delaying everything because of the mediocre iPad. The same might happen in June when supposedly the next iPhone comes out (nothing against the iPhone, though...).
 
I am more and more geting worried that Apple is leaving the core business and is delaying everything because of the mediocre iPad. The same might happen in June hen supposedly the next iPhone comes out (nothing against the iPhone, though...).

iPad is a new product launch and they don't want anything else to take the limelight away. Not to mention that they don't want the slightest of the things to take away the revenue such as an MBA update, albeit MBA and ipad more or less target different audience.

They will/will have to definitely update the MBA/MBP lines either before or during the June event. I don't think it has any relation to the iphone update.
 
iPad is a new product launch and they don't want anything else to take the limelight away. Not to mention that they don't want the slightest of the things to take away the revenue such as an MBA update, albeit MBA and ipad more or less target different audience.

They will/will have to definitely update the MBA/MBP lines either before or during the June event. I don't think it has any relation to the iphone update.

The thing is Apple updated its Macs two weeks before the original iPhone was released... so there's hope for an update shortly before or after the iPad release. Someone else mentioned that Apple still has to have sales in all of its other countries as the iPad isn't available anywhere except the U.S.

On one hand, an update could happen in April or May, but on the other hand Apple updated its Mac notebooks last year at WWDC where it also showed of the new iPhone 3G S.

One thing I think about though is that the Mac notebooks got a very minor update last June compared to the October 2008 update. We're all expecting huge updates since it has been so long. If Apple had new technologies, new chipsets and graphics, USB 3.0, and a few other new technologies like maybe 3G built-in, AN APPLE MEDIA EVENT REALLY MAKES A LOT OF SENSE. There isn't any reason not to do an April event update.

In addition, we also have to remember Apple isn't even going to probably have enough iPads for its initial launch. I suppose if Apple has 1 million iPads ready for the initial launch we would be seeing commercials hourly for the iPad during primetime TV advertisements... I haven't seen any.

There is no reason not to update the Mac notebooks before WWDC if they're ready. I assume if we get a quiet update via Apple.com, we're not getting any modifications to the designs of the Mac notebooks. Also, there is still the possibility of C2D and Nvidia GPUs/chipsets in all of the Mac notebooks. The truth is the CPU is the component that isn't being taken advantage of and probably the least needed change to create an excellent experience. I want an Arrandale CPU only if we get dedicated or hybrid graphics... but otherwise C2D and Nvidia is where Apple will have to go especially with the MBA.

We could get a quiet update Tuesday or Wednesday. We could have a quiet update whenever these Mac notebooks are ready regardless of the iPad launch. We could get a large update with a media event anytime between mid-April and late-June at the WWDC. Really, the deadline is far past, so Apple is definitely changing its update strategy. Mac sales are strong even though most of us find it absurd to buy a Mac notebook that's nearly 10 months old. I would suppose the iMac is doing really well. As for the Mac notebook updates, I have no clue and I don't suppose anyone else does either. We can keep hopeful for any Tuesday to be the day, and eventually it will happen or we will get an announcement of a media event date OR WWDC will be here and they will get updated then. I sure don't like this new Apple being focused so much on the iPad that it's willing to let the Mac notebooks become completely irrelevant with no ability to compete in the market with any other positive other than OS X.

Please Apple... any day now!
 
Yes - from a recent 10K filing. Page 41

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTg1OTB8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&t=1

About 16B out of 36.5B in FY 2009 revenue was generated in the "Americas". Americas in the very least includes Canada, Mexico and Central America. Possibly South America. At best US represents mid 30% of Apple's revenue.

That's interesting, although the filing does break it down further and the Americas represent the majority of the Mac Unit sales and I'd bet the US is the single largest country in terms of sales vs any other country. It's a fair argument to make that a successful launch in their largest single market is important to set the tone for launches in other markets as well as the simple fact that it's a US-based company, so they're not going to launch a new product elsewhere before it's launched here. All of this points to my original point that, yes, they'll probably hold off on new laptops until the iPad is launched here in the US, despite the iPad not being launched elsewhere yet.
 
What I saw - for what its worth

I'm sat on this for a while because I have no proof. I asked the forum moderators if it was okay to post and they said fine but you've got no credibility. I can live with that.

I live near Cupertino, CA. I ride the train to work. I sat near someone around the holidays. They were using a macbook air. I sat down to do some work on my 13inch macbook. When the person closed their laptop, I realized that the size was all wrong in comparison to mine. I was looking at a 17inch and it was as thin as the macbook air!!!!

I should have taken a picture with my iPhone, should have spoken to the person, should have followed them off the train to talk to them, instead I sat there stunned.

I'm assuming it's a prototype. But do they let prototypes off the Apple campus? I don't know, don't know someone to even ask.

No, I wasn't on drugs, didn't fall asleep and was dreaming, don't normally hallucinate - unless this was the first time. But I don't have proof. I figured that since we deal in rumors here, this should fit right in.
 
I'm sat on this for a while because I have no proof. I asked the forum moderators if it was okay to post and they said fine but you've got no credibility. I can live with that.

I live near Cupertino, CA. I ride the train to work. I sat near someone around the holidays. They were using a macbook air. I sat down to do some work on my 13inch macbook. When the person closed their laptop, I realized that the size was all wrong in comparison to mine. I was looking at a 17inch and it was as thin as the macbook air!!!!

I should have taken a picture with my iPhone, should have spoken to the person, should have followed them off the train to talk to them, instead I sat there stunned.

I'm assuming it's a prototype. But do they let prototypes off the Apple campus? I don't know, don't know someone to even ask.

No, I wasn't on drugs, didn't fall asleep and was dreaming, don't normally hallucinate - unless this was the first time. But I don't have proof. I figured that since we deal in rumors here, this should fit right in.

Good information here. However, most of the time people here will criticize you even if you're completely truthful and ultimately correct. We have seen photos of people with iPads out in public, and that's Apple's heavily guarded futuristic tech. We all know Apple execs and managers take their prototypes with them if they use them for their daily workload.

How are you so sure it wasn't a 15" MBA? or possibly an MBP with an MBA's form factor design? I believe it's difficult to determine the difference between a 15" and 17" display in a notebook when you're used to using a 13" display yourself. With the MBP, you have to look for the gap between the speakers as you cannot tell the difference looking at the display... if you're used to a 13" display yourself. If you're used to using a 17" a 15" display is obviously small. So it depends on what you're used to using yourself.

I believe a 15" or 17" MBP could take the form factor design from the MBA if they could drop their optical drives. We even read about rumors of there being a 15" MBA due out last Summer. I definitely believe that we all are about a year ahead of what's going to be released when we see prototypes or hear of these mythical products. I had a friend tell me about a future iMac that took a year to come out which was FINALLY released as the 27" iMac last October.

Anyways, I know there are a few members here that believe the larger displayed MBA would be perfect for them. And most MBP users don't need or want the optical drives... so a 15" and 17" MBP without an optical drive could possibly take the shape of the MBA and lose a pound or more weight.

I will gladly consider such a laptop myself. I would love a 17" MBP that weighed 4 lb. Thinking about it, the dedicated graphics, nice CPU, and loads of other components could fit in a 17" MBP that was shaped as an MBA.

I hope the prototype you saw ultimately makes it to full or mass production. Thank you for sharing. If anyone rips you or says you're lying, just ignore them as you'll probably get the last laugh when three months down the road the exact product you saw gets released.

Cheers!
 
Simple, you're a fanboi. I am too, but I stopped making excuses for Apple's products being so far behind, or below, the competition. If you're really happy running the MINIMUM RAM for each OS, that's your business. I would find it disgusting trying to run OS X alone with any less RAM being allocated for Windows. To run Windows 7 and OS X 10.6, one needs 4 GB of RAM. Sure there are people running servers and doing crazy things with their MBA, but I find running OS X challenging enough with 2 GB of RAM in 2010.

The bottom line is there is no excuse for Apple having its products positioned so far behind its competitors, as it is right now, IN REGARDS TO THE MACS. Anyone that doesn't see it is a fanboi... and is blinded by Sir Jobs and mute to his every word. I love my MBA, but there is NO EXCUSE, in 2010, to have every Mac except the iMac positioned so far behind and below its competitors. It needs an update to every Mac except the iMac (and even needs one there with its low-end version).

Why doesn't Apple want to compete at the top? Why is it so happy with 5% share of the computer market? Apple needs to either actually dominate the high-end market with premium, relevant (which definitely requires current) products, that makes its customers feel they get exactly what they pay for with Macs. Right now, Apple has even its core Mac fan base upset with it. The MacBook Pro is the worst value the MBP has ever been, because it's so very far behind the competition with a sixteen month old graphics system and even shared RAM in its 13" models. There is nothing PRO about the current MacBook PRO. The MBA, while revolutionary when it was introduced, is quickly becoming irrelevant with competitors boasting 8 GB of RAM, hybrid graphics systems, triple the battery life, and Windows 7. The bottom line is system RAM is more important than Apple deemed it, and 2 GB is no longer relevant if it's trying to be a primary Mac doing great things.

I am getting to the point where there just isn't any reason to do this anymore. I am willing to pay Apple a lot of money to make the Mac I really want, and I am a disappointed AAPL shareholder knowing that Apple, Inc. isn't keeping its Mac customers happy. Apple needs to decide if it's going to do Macs right and keep them a fair value for the substantial premium and luxury costs, or tell its customers that it only cares about iPad, iPod, and iPhone sales. Right now, there are only two Macs people should even consider buying... one is a WhiteBook and the other is the iMac. I guess Apple is selling a lot of iMacs for sales to be acceptable with Pro Macs that are nine plus months old each. People aren't getting what they're paying for, and that is a huge problem. When people buy Macs, they justify the costs in their head, because they're normally getting what the expect to be the best computer available for the job. The problem is OS X alone isn't winning that battle anymore, so Apple needs to keep its Macs current and relevant.

I am a disappointed Apple Computer fan, and I feel that my AAPL stock would be a lot more valuable if Apple, Inc. kept its products current and relevant. If updates came every six months, that would be acceptable. But to see thousands of posts daily in the MBP threads reading that people are buying Vaio Zs and other PCs because they're sick of waiting for an update, and they realize that OS X has lost its edge over Windows with version 7. If anyone finds the current situation acceptable, I have to wonder why given the age of technology we're in, and the desire for pros, prosumers, and enthusiasts to spend money but they cannot with their favorite company because it doesn't update its products in a timely fashion. The bottom line is Apple fans aren't getting what they're paying for with year old Mac Pros, nearly ten month old MBPs and MBAs, nine month old iPhones, and seven month old iPods. No other company could do what Apple is doing, and what Apple is doing is killing its Mac and OS X brands all in the name of the iPad.

I am frustrated, and no 2 GB of RAM isn't acceptable in 2010. Remember that your MBA is sharing 256 MB of RAM to the GPU, and has LESS THAN 1 GB for each OS remaining isn't acceptable for a virtual machine environment between OS X 10.6 and Windows 7. These are the two current OSes and they have less than their required minimums each when one factors in the fact that 256 MB is being used by the GPU. Not acceptable and there is no excuse.

I know this isn't the MBA, but even when Apple updates there hardware, PCs vendors still use more powerful hardware.
Look at this example.


3.06GHz Intel Core 2 Duo < outdated
8GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM
500GB SATA HD 7200 RPM
8x super drive
bluetooth
backlit keyboard.
3 year ACPP
OUT DATED Nvidia Geforce 9400M and 9600m gt
$3598.00
YAY!

Dell Studio 15
Intel Core i7-820QM QUAD CORE Processor 1.73GHz (3.06GHz Turbo Mode, 8MB cache)
8GB DDR3 SDRAM 1066 MHz
500GB SATA HD 7200 RPM
ATI Mobile Radeon HD 5470 1GB
Centrino N for WiFi
8X slot loading drive
backlit keyboard
Windows 7 Ultimate
Bluetooth built in (2.1 and EDR)
3 Year Basic service plan
$2323.00!

I really love features like Magsafe, Mac OSX, BEAUTIFUL Aluminum casing, and other thinks, but I can not beliveve how MacBook Pros deserve the name MacBook pro, when the hardware is getting worse than a laptop thats $1000+ less.
 
What I saw - for what its worth

Good information here. However, most of the time people here will criticize you even if you're completely truthful and ultimately correct.

Thanks and I do expect that.

How are you so sure it wasn't a 15" MBA? or possibly an MBP with an MBA's form factor design? I believe it's difficult to determine the difference between a 15" and 17" display in a notebook when you're used to using a 13" display yourself.

You're right on both points. I categorized what I saw as a macbook air because of the thinness. Yet it could just as easily been a MBP with the form factor of a macbook air. I hadn't thought about the size until you mentioned it. It did look like a 17inch to me, but could it have been a 15inch, I guess it could. It wasn't a 13inch, that I'm sure of. I have no idea what's inside, just that it was a mac, thin and bigger than my 13inch. But, I'd love to own it.
 
Thanks and I do expect that.
Basically the reason for that is from people who post information about an upcoming release, usually disappearing afterwards, and then the information turns out wrong.

The best way to stop those doubts is to get a track record. If what you said turns out right people are (much) more likely to believe you.

I really love features like Magsafe, Mac OSX, BEAUTIFUL Aluminum casing, and other thinks, but I can not beliveve how MacBook Pros deserve the name MacBook pro, when the hardware is getting worse than a laptop thats $1000+ less.
It's a "pro" in name only. To clear up a common misconception, "pro" doesn't mean "I can use this hardware for professional purposes," it means "it uses the high-end components in a product range."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.