air...
Stop whining, there is still hope...![]()
Yes, that is a possibility. And it's a great marketing ploy - here's this amazing laptop that has great portability, a beautiful form factor, and unheard-of battery life, the must-have device of the year. The only thing is, to get the most out of it, you have to have another Mac to connect it to. So for those who just "must" have it, Apple will make up to 2 sales.I get the feeling from all the possibilities and worries presented in the various threads that the apple subnotebook will be a computer for people who already have a computer.
web browsing, email, quicktime, itunes and all on airport, that's what I need on my lap (when it's not otherwise occupied). I've got plenty of horsepower for real work with my other machines.
i say the less ports the better- just give me fast, easy syncing and a long battery life.
Jeez some people are stupid...
If you wanted an optical drive and more ports then you would be in the market for a regular laptop. You cant expect it to be smaller and contain the same stuff, thats impossible.
Secondly, all the limitations could be gotten around simply. No optical drive? Buy an external burner. Jeez.
Apple could always just sell a docking station to provide more connectivity. Remember their patent application from a few weeks back? That would provide all the ports, optical drive, gigabit, and a larger display for use at home/office and leave you free to zoom about lightweight when on the road.Yes, that is a possibility. And it's a great marketing ploy - here's this amazing laptop that has great portability, a beautiful form factor, and unheard-of battery life, the must-have device of the year. The only thing is, to get the most out of it, you have to have another Mac to connect it to. So for those who just "must" have it, Apple will make up to 2 sales.
The lack of an ethernet jack is not an option. I use my laptop primarily over the air, but when i'm editing some photo-RAW's which are located on my NAS, I'll take the wired gigabit road.
I'm really not into that super slim subnotebook... What about updated MBP's? That's what I'm really waitin' for.
I still don't see the purpose for such a device unless it's priced at sub $500. Might as well just have a macbook.
No ethernet
Slimness not important
It sounds like this is not the computer for you.
Based on the Buyer's Guide, there should be MacBook Pro updates soon. I could see them doing a new case, to match this new style.
hahaha... sub $500? Are you on crack? This will be about $2k.
The whole point is pushing technology. Some people want to carry around a lighter notebook. The MacBook is small, but weighs a ton.
Yes yes yes but the problem there is that you might forget to take something important with you that you need. Apple's philosophy has always been that you need everything all the time. That's why as soon as capacities allowed, they gave you a music player that housed all your music - that was one of the two major killer factors that brought iPod success (the other being the ease of use). It's also the reason that they took so long to come up with the iPod shuffle - not because it wasn't technologically possible, but because they couldn't conceive that you would only want to take with you a subset of your music, and hence the 'shuffle' moniker and marketing.Is it plausible to have a 32GB laptop with the full OSX that syncs a subset of your documents, music, movies etc from your main computer? Imagine having the important parts of your data with you on the go, and when you get home automatically having access to the full data storage. (or even accessing your full data storage via "Back to my Mac" or .Mac backups?)
I'd like to throw all my music and movies onto a home server (or my old iMac's external drive), sync one subset of that to AppleTV, and take a different subset of data with me.
Maybe it will be sliced from corner to corner, so you get width enough for some USB ports near the hinge, but a rectangular profile when combined.![]()
The price...
What's the point of portable if you can't bring some DVDs on the plane?
Ok...so less powerful, less features, only smaller and more expensive. Yeah that make a lot of sense, I'll take two...no thanks![]()
Yeah, I'm expecting expensive.
However I want something that's more powerbook 12" than macbook. I know there's quite a few folk who feel the same.
I'm still of the mind that there's a new thin Macbook/MBP coming (13.3", narrow bezel, no multi-touch, no optical drive) as well as a small tablet-like device (maybe with 6-8" and multitouch).