I really must be a nerd, somehow, or one who's really just affected by design in some (possibly-twisted) way, but...
Dude, its just a slightly thinner computer.
I really must be a nerd, somehow, or one who's really just affected by design in some (possibly-twisted) way, but...
Why are Mac lovers obsessed with thin? I mean, who cares if something is 1.0" vs 0.8". For practical purposes, no differences and it becomes MUCH more fragile. I don't understand how you can say half the things you just did. The only thing that matters is thin? So even if it isn't usable or practical, as long as it's thin, it's golden? Makes no sense. Primary purpose of the thing's very existence is to be USED. Not usable= no point.
I DO that a 2" thick laptop is all but worthless, but come on. That was too much.
I really must be a nerd, somehow, or one who's really just affected by design in some (possibly-twisted) way, but...
Dude, its just a slightly thinner computer.
OMG Please shut up. All these rumor sites should be shut down 24 hours before all of steve's keynotes. Too much speculation. Too much excitement. It might be hard to beleive but some people still have to report to their jobs today. So please don't make it any more difficult for them.
Fortunately for me though, keynote will start at 10:30PM here. Five minutes after I finish my work. But still it doesn't help alot as I'd be checking MR every five minutes while at work.
Can't wait. Just a few more hours to go before iChristmas is here. Santa Steve is back in town.
You're going to have to sync it with iTunes?
No, I stand by it...my iMac doesn't have to be thin, my Macbook doesn't have to be thin...THIS machine has to be thin. Why are the nano, iPhone and RAZR so sexy to hold? Because they are thin. Thin laptops are quite usable (I'm not suggesting they leave out a decent processor or enough RAM), and they aren't "fragile" (see VAIO TX series)...unless you've held a thin, light, laptop in your hands, you won't understand why it's so appealing. The MB and MBP are thin enough for most casual laptop users, but travelers CRAVE thinness.
I don't want to rain on the parade, but if this MacbookAir is the same dimensions as a macbook today, except 8mm thinner, and 3 lbs instead of 5 lbs, is that really a big deal (and i'm guessing based upon the mockups)?
...
I thought that it was going to have no ports
if thats the case its beautiful, absolutely beautiful.
What?!.....It's not in colors!?!![]()
Ok, I understand what you're saying. I own an ASUS W3j. 1.4" at the thickest. 14" with a dedicated graphics card. You are right, to a point. I have held a nano, iphone and razr. I've almost dropped all of them. I won't go into it here, but because of the size of my fingers/hands, I wish apple had made the iphone permanently oriented sideways except while at your ear. Bigger keypad, 2 thumb usage instead of holding with 1 hand and pecking with the other.![]()
Yes! Please! Let it look like this! Lose the firewire! Lose the optical drive! Lose ethernet! THIN is the ONLY thing that matters in a machine like this...it's not for Photoshop, DVD authoring, or sitting on your home network...add a tiny $29 USB to ethernet dongle as an option (a la the USB modem), include an external DVD writer (slim of course), and sell it for $1500...this could be huge. Perhaps built-in 3G wireless (something in the air)?
if this is truly an ultra portable, i dont see the need for their to be an actual keyboard. why isnt it all touch?
if theres a full working keyboard, there should be an optical drive.
It's gotta have at least USB or it will become a beautiful museum piece. I know Apple like to play the form over function card a lot, but no ports is just impractical. I can live w/o an internal optical, but I need USB, FW400, and video out. Video out can be via a dongle, but I need the capability w/o a dock. Either that OR two express card slots so I can add this functionality.
I'm really having trouble feeling you here. All we have is a mock up of a traditional form factor known as the laptop. There is no fundamental shift being represented here. If its a touch screen then i would argue that its a step back due to poor ergonomics. (imagine using your finger as a mouse for any length of time while your arm and wrist are suspended over the keyboard. You forearms are going to smack you up the side of the head for buying this.
As a tablet, yes, I can see where your soaring ecstasy is justified. And it would make a truly wonderful, transparent... thing. What is the purpose of the... thing. Apple makes no product that doesn't fit EXACTLY into a niche. Either one already existing or they create one. What is the niche for a tablet? Or, for that matter, a laptop with a touch screen?
Touch is fine for a phone, but lousy for a laptop. Try typing a 50 page report with a virtual keyboard. And I don't really get the relationship between not having an optical drive and a keyboard. Most road warriors use their optical drive zero times on the road. The keyboard is used every single time the laptop is used. An optical drive adds to a machines thickness and weight. A keyboard does not.