Backing up to a tape drive would be faster.
Is it me or is .Mac stupidly slow? I'm on a 100mb connection so it isnt my connection.
Backing up to a tape drive would be faster.
Electrons don't move too fast. We did calculations in my 2nd physics class showing how an electron at the socket will take something like 3+ days to reach the lamp through a 6 foot cord. Neat stuff.
How is that possible? Electrons move at the speed of light, I thought.
Can't see that working myself. If you want to pop in a CD you have to shut the laptop, turn it over insert disk, turn in back the right way, open the lid, oh balls its the wrong CD....
I would prefer a laptop without any moving parts whatsoever. Not counting electrons, mind you. Hard drive is already bad enough and optical drives make it even worse. Could they eliminate those two, the future laptops would be insanely great!
What are you thinking off? Intel's fastest mobile processor is in the MacBook Pro. They cant put any faster CPU in there. Maybe a faster graphics card but the heat already is tremendous off this thing. And its not Apple's trend of miniaturizing things, its the consumer trend of wanting smaller things that makes sense. I bought a 12" PB, why? Well because I wanted something to take notes with in class. Anything more than 3-4 pounds, roughly the weight feel of a medium textbook would be bothersome. A heavy textbook is too much and I know that there isnt much out there smaller than a 12" that is usable. So it was perfect. Now, if I'm going to buy another Apple, I doubt its going to be a 5.2 lb. 4.6 was nice, much bigger would start getting bothersome. Plus if I'm going to carry more weight I rather take the 15" for .4 lbs more. Atleast it has a much bigger display. But clearly small is good for many, so I there are few that don't appreciate a small Apple and even fewer than agree with you.I don't necessarily care about smaller laptops, I'm more concerned with improving the overall speed and quality of the notebook. One of the main reasons I refuse to buy a 13" Mac Book is that it's TOO small. I don't want a tiny keyboard and a small screen to limit my work, my 23" monitor is small enough. I think Apple needs to get over this obsession with "small" (see iPod Nano, etc.) and start focusing on quality and speed (and when I mean quality I am referring to the many issues the first batch of Mac Book and Mac Book Pro's encountered). I love Apple, always will, but I don't think mounting an optical drive at the bottom of a notebook in order to make them thinner and smaller is paramount to improving laptop computers.![]()
But clearly small is good for many, so I there are few that don't appreciate a small Apple and even fewer than agree with you.
A lot of things point to this. Firstly this patent is only relevant to a computer whose perimeter real estate is small. Look at a PB 12" if you have one. It has the smallest perimeter of any Apple computer in the past 7 years. The ports dont even take up the whole left side. The right side is filled up even less with only the slot loading. There is plenty of room if you want more perephials. If you are getting to the point that you need that perimeter space where the CD slot is in it has to be one of two things: a much smaller computer (useless) or have a lot more ports (what! 5 FIREWIRE.I really think Apple is making a tablet that doesn't even have a keyboard like usual PeeCee tablets. It'd be just a smaller version of an iMac with a battery basically, and of course a touch display.
For that kind of design such a mount makes sense.
So I'm sitting at home where I've got my MacBook Pro connected to an external 2nd screen, external firewire hard drive, 4-port USB hub, ethernet broadband connection and power cord - and I'm going to have to turn the thing over in order to get to the drive in order to install a new version of <insert software package here>? I can't see this ever being feasible in a laptop. I also can't really see what difference it makes with regards to the physical size of the drive dictating the size of the machine - the laptop can't be any deeper than the size of a CD plus however mm extra it needs, so why can't it just be left on the side or at the front of the machine as it is now - will the difference in engineering really be that much?