Asking to be able to use 2 external monitors on a MacBook Neo in clamshell that costs $765 doesn't sound unreasonable for basic users. If Apple could make 2 displays work over the single USB 3 port, then thunderbolt wouldn't be needed.
Until then, I'll still keep pushing for Thunderbolt 3 just to be able to use 2 external monitors on the Neo.
And then it will be more expensive, not be $765 any more and miss the point of what it’s supposed to be.
Or they’ll have to compromise something(s) else instead. Which features should Apple remove from everyone else’s experience to satisfy this edge case of yours?
Or are you really saying they should just throw in Thunderbolt/Dual monitor capability for free?
That expectation is the part that’s unreasonable.
You say “doesn't sound unreasonable for basic users”…
That’s just incorrect. The vast majority of “basic users” won’t ever even plug ONE external monitor into this let alone two. Again, it’s such an edge case.
A few loud voices are up in arms about what’s “missing” or “compromised” in the Neo.
Some are saying it needs all those things — well, that’s an Air.
Others (including you it seems) are saying “it just needs this one thing, and it’s reasonable to want that”, except there’s 27 different “one things” so which one thing should Apple add out of all of them to make people happy?
Or to put it another way: What really defines what’s reasonable?
Meanwhile… $765. Might feel expensive, and ok, I can’t deny you that if that’s how
you feel, but you do understand this is the lowest priced Mac laptop
ever, by a significant margin, right? How do you think they achieved that?
As I mentioned previously, compare it with every other laptop by any brand, at its price point. Sure some of them will have your particular “one thing”, but what have they left out to accommodate it, at the price?
It’s just nuts that people expect they should get extras for free.