Unless Arn has seen the iPod for himself then he can't say accurately that this information is 100% true... which is the implication of this thread.
I am lead to assume one of two things. Either Arn has seen this new device in all its plastic glory or this "fact" remains as a "reported" fragment of news/speculation/rumour - however reliable the source of this information may seem to be!!!! This is the whole ethos of this site!!!!
If the latter of the above is the case, then MR should state that the Thinksecret information shows "strong signs" of being accurate and that it is "highly likely" that the new iPods will be of a certain capacity. To introduce the concept of "fact" here is problematic and must mean, therefore, that Arn has seen this new product for himself, perhaps even used it! If he has not, then some element of doubt must be involved here, and "factual accuracy" must ultimately be questioned. Steve Jobs, himself, could tell me that the new iPod was a all-in-one PDA, mp3, digicam, phone (or whatever you may wish for) and this would, still, not be "proof" that these features were be genuine. I don't want to get into philosophy here, but to state so categorically that something is accurate is jeopordising the rep of the site because nothing, other than the physical engagement with something: visual, aural, olfactory, experiential can show something to be real or genuine.
Arn may, very well, be correct on this - and a large part of me hopes he is - but unless he has seen, used and experienced this thing for himself then an element of doubt must prevail. All I am saying is that he has taken someone's word to be factual, which these sites teach you never to do, and I fear for the consequences if this word is wrong. That is what I mean by the rep of this site is at stake!
This is, surely, the sensible, pragmatic position in all of this!
- pinks