Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i was hoping to NOT make it thinner...and instead use the regained space to house multiple SSD drives and a lot more RAM (32 gig or 64 gig)

ohhhh well
If the rumors are true that it will not be a wedge shape and just thinner then there will be plenty of room for multiple 2.5 drives.
 
Unless you're doing a lot of photo or video editing I don't really see the point of the MBP anymore.

I've actually found the USB-ethernet connection is so far inferior than using wifi; I don't bother plugging in with my MBA anymore, I just use wifi at work.

Losing the ethernet and optical drive puts the decision all down to processing capability. Retina display is great, but the resolution on a MBA is almost there anyway IMO.
 
USB Dongle for ethernet would be fine with me -- I really only need ethernet at home to jack into my corporate hardware-based firewall/router/VPN.

Also at home and at work, docking with a 27" Cinema Display over Thunderbolt provides a Thunderbolt pass-thru, Firewire 800, Ethernet and three more USB ports, so that's the route I would go (with my existing FW-based TimeMachine drive hooked into the back of the 27" Cinema Display along with the ethernet to the corporate VPN).

In otherwords, I don't mourn the loss of ethernet or firewire, if that part of the rumor turns out to be fact.
 
One thing I’m surprised never surfaced is a smaller physical spec ethernet port. USB shrunk constantly over the years (USB “standard”, Mini, Micro), it would’ve been pretty simple to introduce a smaller modular jack (even smaller vs. a phone/RJ11/14 size), since it’s just a physical connector (i.e., no conversion, just proper pinouts).

Exactly, I wondered myself why they didn't/don't go that way.
I've seen tiny RJ11 to RJ45 Adapters so if an internet jack RJ 45 is needed then just plug in that tiny Adapter and still be able to use wired network.

similar to this.↓↓↓

RJ45%20crossover%20adapter.jpg
 
The drawback with that idea is that I really like the 30" monitor I already have. There is a real opportunity for someone to make a simple Thunderbolt port replicator. Offer it with some combination of Thunderbolt, Firewire, eSATA, USB 3.0, DVI-DL, Mini DisplayPort, and Ethernet connectors.

I agree. I prefer the monitors that I have already too, hence why I linked to the Belkin adaptor that will solve our problems.
 
Boo... I can accept the lack of optical media, but the lack of an ethernet port is a deal breaker for me. Going to stick with my two year old model.

As well you should. It is a two year old Mac. You shouldn't have to upgrade.

I will be weighing the pro against the air for my next laptop and this thinner form factor for me might literally tip the scales in favor of the pro.
 
Hold your horses :) This is a rumor after all. I can't see Apple abandoning FireWire quite yet. Not on the Macbook Pro – after all, it's way too important for quite a huge number of pros:
Music, Photography, Video.

I know, there's thunderbolt. But there's not many devices so far which support thunderbolt (for example digital cameras & audio devices).

It is not primarily Thunderbolt that that is killing off Firewire. It is USB 3.0 also.

Name a new camera that hit the market in the last 2-3 years with Firewire 800 on it? In the consumer/prosumer sprectrum I don't think there are any. You may be able to dig up a handful of niche cameras, but the overall trend with cameras as they have largely converted to "file storage" devices ( they have drives and transfer is a file transfer problem) is to dump FW.

In contrast, the new Nikon D800 has USB 3.0. The first of probably many "pro" DSLR to make that move.


Similar trend on the audio products market. New products introduced over last 2-3 years that are not just warmed over update have increasingly used USB.

Blackmagic rolled out USB 3.0 stuff two years ago and several Thunderbolt devices this year at NAB.

There is a large amount of legacy equipment with Firewire 400 and 800 interfaces, but it peaked several years back. There is huge wave of USB 3.0 products coming. If there are more than one USB 3.0 sockets on these new MBP they are more than aligned with those.

There is a smaller wave of Thunderbolt devices coming also. But it combination of the two waves that FW is loosing ground to.



If anything, they'll include a FW / TB converter. But is it possible to convert ALL the FW functionality to TB?

It isn't really a "converter". There will be a devices with a FW controller in it. That controllers PCI_e interface will be hooked to the TB controller. You will still be buying a FW controller; it just isn't bundled.


FW in the personal computer context is a "dead ender" technology. It is stuck at 800 and has been passed up on the track. There is "enough" FW features that Apple approximates with Thunderbolt (e.g., 'Target DIsk Mode' ) that FW will just get passed by. There is no need for TB to exactly duplicate FW.

Folks that need a FW controller will just have to buy it separately if want it on a Mac laptop. It isn't like that isn't already the case for FW800 on Windows laptops. There may be a FW400 socket but there was no widespread deployment of FW800. Folks who wanted it have to jump to a ExpressCard solution. Going with Thunderbolt isn't that different.



Apple isn't going to include an optional connector. Doesn't line-up with their 'Green' packaging moves to reduce the number of things in the box that many aren't going to use.

It would not be surprising if Apple comes out with a combo "FW + 1GB Ethernet" , "FW + 1GB Ethernet + HDMI " or "FW + 1GB + Superdrive" Thunderbolt device. If not some 3rd party will. The problem with having dedicated single use dongles for both Ethernet and FW is that the cost is going to be painfully high for those that need a more than one of these.
In short, I think for the common "missing port combinations" if there is large enough market a "one port" TB dongle is probably going to spring up to keep the costs as low as possible.

That's another motivator for the two TB port set up. One port for either a single TB port, bus powered dongle or a legacy Disport Port device. The other TB is free to handle other pure TB chains without having to worry about device placement in the chain. (or worry as much about placement.).



An Ethernet only dongle would be some like a 10GbE one:
http://www.attotech.com/products/category.php?id=15&catid=16

Which is expensive but definitely addresses the "faster than wireless" network speeds when working in a high speed NAS/SAN.
 
It's weird to see complaints about the ethernet port. We have known from the beginning that the next case design would be thinner, and everyone with a Pro can already see that the ethernet port is the full thickness of the existing case design. It was DOA.
 
Why is that idea a facepalm?

Because such a contraption has been mentioned about 100 times in this thread. And it exists!

----------

It's weird to see complaints about the ethernet port. We have known from the beginning that the next case design would be thinner, and everyone with a Pro can already see that the ethernet port is the full thickness of the existing case design. It was DOA.

I can't understand the surprise either. In the MBP sub-forum I've mentioned it a couple of times that if the thinner rumours are true, then Ethernet will have to go. Look at the side of your current MBP and tell me if it's possible to make it thinner without losing the Ethernet port.
 
I agree. I prefer the monitors that I have already too, hence why I linked to the Belkin adaptor that will solve our problems.

Belkin has been talking about their dock for at least a year, but as far as I know it isn't shipping yet. It is rather limited in the variety of connectors it offers too.
 
All in all, this seems to become an update with mixed feelings...

+ Thinner
+ Lighter
+ More Power
+ Better (Retina?) display

– No Ethernet
– No Superdrive
– No real power button. This is annoying.
– Connector on both sides. Cables hanging out from both sides and other things sticking out? Cable clutter! One of the things I dislike about my Air, just like the point before.
 
But then you give up your USB 3 port to use ethernet it's not the best solution. Unless they put 3x of them on there to make up for it.

I always buy the 17" model that has three USB ports and I only ever use two at once (iPhone + Display Adapter for Mini-Display Port to Dual-Link DVI)

I wouldn't mind losing one USB port to use an Ethernet adapter as a result. Or a Thunderbolt connector even whichever they decide to use for the adapter when the time comes.
 
Why on earth would Apple waste space on TWO thunderbolt ports??? Especially when there is so much hype around the daisy-chaining numerous devices!?

...and I really hope they wont sacrifice the FW800 just yet - although it could probably push thunderbolt ahead faster...

2 TB ports is what I need the MOST. Many TB devices don't allow daisy chaining. A little bummed about FW800 being removed, because that creates new problems, but I'll figure things out.
 
Do you want a sticker that says Macbook Pro??

And Apple can wave goodbye to the professional market.

Seriously..the title MacBook Pro is nothing but a title. Get over it. A computer running an ivy bridge processor is certainly up to "pro"standard. Perhaps Apple can include a sticker saying pro on it to make you goofs satisfied. As for firewire...as far as no Firewire..you need to really understand what Thunderbolt is. Firewire will work just fine with an adapter cable...and Firewire 800 on a laptop..seriously?
 
Retina Display needs to have antiglare option

A retina display would be great as long as they have a antiglare option.
 
USB 3.0: nice addition, but Firewire is a MUST HAVE requirement for a device carrying 'Pro' in its name.
A 1Gb Ethernet Port is also necessary to have, unless it is going to be replaced by a USB-to-Ethernet adapter.

Consider that many people use their MBPs for video editing on-the-go, so they need the convenience, speed and reliability of Firewire. And Gb Ethernet is also needed to efficiently join a rendering farm.

Optical drive is needed, but not all the time, so an external SuperDrive should do the trick. Now most people carry USB Flash Drives, so a SuperDrive would be needed to specifically clone or create a DVD.
 
Such a shame, but it seems like Apple is making this less of a working mans machine, and more of a consumer oriented device.
 
Belkin has been talking about their dock for at least a year, but as far as I know it isn't shipping yet. It is rather limited in the variety of connectors it offers too.

Firewire, Ethernet and some other junk. That's all we need, surely? There are economies of scale to think about for a company before simply releasing a product. They knew that TB chip prices would be going down once Apple exclusivity deal was finished and they knew that PC manufacturers would be including TB. More customers = more win for Belkin. Besides, the thing was unveiled at CES at the beginning of this year and they mentioned they were planning to start shipping in August / September 2012. I don't think they plucked those dates out of thin air.
 
...and the total discreditation of the "Pro" moniker is complete!

What does this mean? Lots of us making plenty of $$$ off our Macs and wouldn't really miss the Ethernet jack. Plus there is the dongle if it is needed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.