He does have a point. Twice they've killed functionality for size.
The 3rd generation shuffle & the 6th generation nano.
Ok. But please don't forget. Apple is now the richest and most successful company in the world.
He does have a point. Twice they've killed functionality for size.
The 3rd generation shuffle & the 6th generation nano.
So the iPad 3 will have a second tier panel made by Sharp?
Oh my ufkin` god, i do own a 50" TV set which has lower resolution than that!
if it weren't for Apple with such an enormous cash reserve we would have to wait much longer for displays like this.
If they make it any thinner it will be hard to hold. If they keep it the same size, reduce the weight slightly and provide a higher rez display I would be happy. Actually if they could make it so we could fold it and put it in our pockets that would be even better.
Ok. But please don't forget. Apple is now the richest and most successful company in the world.
A Retina display is a huge deal and not just another detail.If retina display and faster processor is what I gonna get with the iPad 3 I wont buy. BUT.... if that just small details of it I hope it fill my needs because I dont need a laptop since I turn on my iPad for the first time. iPad 1 was great... Then iPad 2 came with nice extras... Now what?
assuming they don't change screen sizes, 2048x1536 will only get them 264 dpi.
it would have to be 2560 x 1920 to be 330 dpi
Absolutely nothing to do with it. Apple wants to be nimble and they don't want to own their own factories.
No
Steve Jobs met with Obama to discuss the issue of factories. He wanted them to be in the USA. However he needed 30,000 engineers which he can't find in the USA.
This does seem more like Apple's style. I don't think they would settle for "thicker".