I really hope you're right - both my garmins lose BT to my phone between floors of my fairly average sized house.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Third-Party Tesla App Provides Look at Opportunities and Limitations of Apple Watch Development [Updated]
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I really hope you're right - both my garmins lose BT to my phone between floors of my fairly average sized house.
I remember when people got contact lenses so they wouldnt have to wear glasses..but then they just put on fake hipster glasses over their contacts to look cool...
I agree with everything you've said. First impressions with this product are going to be more important than ever. I'd rather have a limited experience that hopefully "just works" than stuff not ready for prime time that doesn't. Jony Ive said the Watch is the most difficult project he's ever worked on at Apple. I think it's clear the Watch was not ready for prime time when Apple showed it off last year, at least not from a software perspective. But hey we know when the iPhone was announced the software was pretty much being held up with duct tape and employees were nervous as hell that some of the demos wouldn't work.
People should listen to the latest Debug podcast with Don Melton and Nitin Ganatra (one or both worked for Scott Forstall while at Apple). They give really good insight to software development/shipping software at Apple. They talk about how limited the first iPhone OS was but how it was exactly the right thing at that time.
Apple is so far behind the game and they haven't even started shipping yet.
I made the mistake of purchasing the first generation iPad and I won't make the same mistake in purchasing first-gen Apple products ever again. When people say they like to start small with first-gen stuff, they really ain't kidding. Things start to ramp up to much more acceptable feature levels in the second-gen.
The less than one day battery life will be the thing that kills this more than anything for me. That, and the poor quality control that seems to have haunted Apple as of recent in their software.
I made the mistake of purchasing the first generation iPad and I won't make the same mistake in purchasing first-gen Apple products ever again. When people say they like to start small with first-gen stuff, they really ain't kidding. Things start to ramp up to much more acceptable feature levels in the second-gen.
The less than one day battery life will be the thing that kills this more than anything for me. That, and the poor quality control that seems to have haunted Apple as of recent in their software.
Looks like all popular mac webpages are getting good money from Google to make bad press.. Hehe, all other wearables sucks in my opinion apple watch looks the best. The things that I don't like are no gps without phone and maybe battery, not deal breaker for me. 
I would assume it's similar to other current Bluetooth accessories. I use a Bluetooth headphone at the gym and can leave my phone at the bench while I walk a good 75 feet to the water fountain without any disruption in the streaming audio. Never tested the outer limits
Apple has been very transparent about this. They said on day one you won't have access to all these items, but that they will give you access very soon in the future. They plan to open up the full apps after the june WWDC. The reason is because without a system to decide which app gets control the watch would literally be dead in 10 minutes. We're up against physics not apple magically restricting stuff because it doesn't want you to have fun.
I feel the big difference is that the iPhone had room to grew whereas the iWatch will not.
Software-wise the iWatch is just like other smart watches in that it mostly replicates functions already present on a cell phone. This is in vast contrast to the iPhone which improved and added functions over previous non-touchscreen smartphones (& dumb phones).
I feel that the focus on health kit makes sense in this context because it'll offer new functionality not available on smartphones. However I do not believe the type of accurate, non-invasion, health monitoring that iWatch needs to succeed exists at this moment (or in the foreseeable feature).
Lastly is that the iPhone became the Cadillac of smartphones however the iWatch--as yearly commodity--will never surpass Rolex for top watch. This will forever hurt Apple's brand image.
(also battery blah blah blah).
So it makes sense why Johny Ivy would say the Apple Watch is there most difficult product. Steve jobs famously said one of the toughest aspects of his job was canceling products. I feel that Tim Cook was under too much pressure to make the next big thing happen that he stopped to critical evaluate the product.
Doesn't it work both ways? Just because you had problems doesn't mean everyone else does...
It's really quite simple* - they are not necessarily the same people. Different people have different opinions. Crazy how that works!??
(*since that fact does challenge certain members on this board on a regular basis, maybe I'm making the wrong assumption when I say "simple"
)
That would be brilliant if true.
If your iPhone just had to be in any room in the house and you wan wander around the house with the watch, and the watch be fully functional then it will make it so vastly better, than if you needed to keep the phone, say in the same room as you were otherwise the connection was lost.
I do hope Apple explain this and a typical range to be expected in a normal home with walls etc, before launch day.
I'm definitely hoping that's the case. The Watch does have wifi so if it's on the same network perhaps some functionality could be extended to it. (Fingers crossed).
Which entirely misses the point of the smart watch.
Yes, all that functionality exists on the phone already. Heck, I believe OnStar's phone app lets me remote start and lock/unlock my car remote already (if I ever set it up), but doing that on my phone is actually more of a hassle than using the key/remote my car came with. I have to pull my phone out of my pocket, unlock it, launch an app, and hit whichever commands do what I want them to do. Compare that to the remote: I tap the Lock button, tap the Remote Start button, then tap the Unlock button, and I'm set ... and I can do all of that without pulling my hand out of my pocket to look at the remote.
The Apple Watch would potentially be closer to the remote than it would be to the phone: raise my arm, select the app, and tap whatever I need to do. Bam.
It's not laziness, it's convenience. It creates fewer actions necessary to accomplish the same task, particularly because the Watch is on my arm and the apps are designed specifically to be easy to use. Brief interactions, then done. Least resistance.
That's why this is so compelling, and why I think this will be a huge hit. It will be the path of least resistance to so many actions during our day, so many little things that become just automatic reflexes, and I fully believe Mr. Cook when he says he can't live without it.
Clearly you're no dev. I'm a web dev and here to tell ya -- native will always be faster. It's compiled, first. Second, web apps have to bring all their HTML, CSS, and JavaScript down over the wire, whereas a native app has all layout resources locally. Thus if you want the best experience or performance, it's native.
----------
Nope. You guys don't understand how software works. much like products, APIs are developed over time. The stork doesn't just drop them down perfectly finished -- it takes years to determine what's useful, safe, etc.. Today's iOS APIs can do way, way more than the original IPhone OS.
things improve over time. It's just common sense. Not so common....
----------
Yeah and how did that turn out? Oh yeah, as the most successful, profitable, beloved mobile platform of all time. And copied!
Going slow and iterating improvements is exactly how apple rolls. Has for decades.
What a cool car though. When I saw that screenshot of the car on the watch, my first thought was the 1982 Star Trek Movie Wrath of Khan when the animation of the shields coming up around the ship with the dots and sound effect.
The problem with your statement is that is sensible, is based on facts, and does not call people names.
You need to do better.
My understanding the watch has not been released and the development tools are beta. Apple likely is limiting APIs until battery life issues can be addressed.
Thank you for pointing that out. I LOVE podcasts and will listen to that asap.
----------
I worked at an Apple Store for years and have had first-hand contact with thousands of customers. The overwhelming majority of them feel extremely positive about their Apple product experience. Those who have had defective products have received first rate service ad the Genius Bar. There are very few detractors with Apple product users, especially compared tidiest about any other tech company in the world.
Cool, but I take it the lock/unlock function wouldn't be utilized that much because the car extends the handles and unlocks when you come near it anyway.
iCloud Drive...ugh...
I've been buying, providing support for, and earning a living from Apple products for 32 years. They've never really "just worked". They've "just worked" better than the competition, but that doesn't mean they've been flawless. Not even close.
Apple has become like everyone else these days. Ship something "good enough" and let your customers be eternal beta testers. By the time something is reasonably solid, it's on to the next version and the process starts all over. But this is the future of software in general it seems. At least now, thanks to the Internet, updates can be made quickly rather than waiting a year or two for one massive patch mailed out on floppy disks.
Last edited:
Hold your judgement until you've seen this: https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=20599385#post20599385