Um, I really don't know what to say about Asia.
I really don't know how that pertains to anything we're talking about here. But I've seen people in the East using both Apple and Android devices.
I don't understand how a constant boatload of devices rolling out for the people having to buy them could possibly be cheap for them especially in these developing countries you speak of. That includes tablets. And with less functionality in these devices, it's kind of a waste..
I don't know what that webpage has to do with these phones because everything is condensed on a phone anyway.
...So, I'm just kind of lost...
But I will say that with all the fragmentation there is with Android, and the way they carelessly unleash a bin of phones year on year on year, their empire will probably fall before Apple's ever does.
With Apple, you have one phone, one carrier, one world under one rule. Connectivity at it's best.
Apple, devoid of innovation? Do you know what kinds of patents they have? You must have forgotten.
After that statement, I'm not ready to concede any point to you.
As before a bit myopic or just refusing to think along the logical lines due to preference to the Apple way of thinking.
The rich buys the newest Android phones. There's a ready market for their used phones so they keep buying and keep selling every few months. The poorer people buy the rich's used phones and sell their old ones. And poorer still buys those. The end result is everyone ends up using an Android phone. This happens to a lesser extend with Apple phones as well. Thing is if you are locked into Apple's eco system you are going to be upgrading once a year or so vs once every 6 months to once every months as some people I know are prone to doing. And if you aren't made of money but still want a new phone with new features Android makers have more economical models for you as well.
This leads to market domination because who are you going to develop for the market where there are a few owners or the market with lots of owners?
It's not a model for failure. It's been the cell phone marketing model for a long time in Asia with success since the 90s.
As to the webpage I posted that was to point out there are cultural difference in how things are done and what's viewed as good. The neat manicured eco system of apple is nice but it might not fit into how things are done over the pond. Take the app approval process for example. It's great because people feel safer. However, it's a human driven process. What happens when the billions of potential software developers in China wants in? People over there are very open to using multiple applications on their computer for the same task. And the size of the market means that unlike in Western world where a few apps can dominate the market over there you can have many apps all co-existing. The app approval process is going to become a bigger and bigger burden if those people all pile in on Apple's eco system. It's going to be a big issue especially as the respect for rules are totally different from here. They will happily ignore and find way around apple's rules. And if they get banned? They resurface a few days later having opened a new developer account.
So how does that mean Android's model is better? Well it's simple really Android lets you use apps from other sources. Likely you'll see local firms setting up their own android app stores which will take the burden off from google for maintaining that customer base. It's likely those local stores will cater better to local tastes and needs. To distil it down it's the difference between 1 size fit all and a system that can adapt and evolve.
The basic situation is the dynamics of the market be it for phones or Apps are quite different in Asia. And that market is only just developing so you saying Apple is going to win no matter what is at best an overly simplistic view.
Btw care to name any of the patents they have actually use in the 4S vs the 4? Honestly what did they add? Oh wait they just had to disable push because of Motorola in Germany. Patents are pretty stupid point to make because:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_exercising_a_cat. Numbers of patents a company has is not a 1 to 1 correlation to actually having a useful innovation.
Here's another thought. Apple is 1 company there are how many companies out there doing android phones now? Who's going to end up throwing more stuff on the wall and seeing what sticks? Who's going to end up with more patents? It's a losing battle if they want to win by patents. They are going to get buried if they continue on that route.