While the piece is nice enough, the credit goes to the artist, not the tool. This is a simple piece with nothing technically impressive about it for me to praise the device.
Um... That artwork isn't doing the iPad any favors.
I want to know, what program did Jorge use.
Next news will be,"Front cover of The New Yorker done on a Mac"![]()
Jeez... does every thread on MR need to have negative ninnies spoiling anything that may be positive?
Heh, maybe so but it's nice too see some "pro" art thats been created on an iPad..Heh. This headline reads like that is some marvel like the Taj Mahal or discovery of a root that cures and prevents all cancers. I put it up there is "Dog bites postman," and "Cars speeding over 55 on remote desert highway."
Thats what its built for.
No, admins need access to the file system. Users - no matter if pro or not - do not need access to the file system.Not pro. Real pros need access to the file system!
/s
Heh, maybe so but it's nice too see some "pro" art thats been created on an iPad..
I know people have done it before but I have not seen that much.
Good to know you can do pro work with an iPad.
I've never gotten anything like that out of my iPad!
Guess it proves its the Indian not the arrow![]()
iPad Pro + Apple Pencil is now fully surpassed by the new Surface Pro.
Replicating a process that's normally done on paper using a few pencils isn't easy. Read some artists' tablet reviews to understand why. You need good tech, including a high enough sample rate and smart sensor implementation, to avoid lag, jittery pressure sensitivity, contact offset, and surface grab, among others. Laying it all on an "active digitizer" (what's that?) is a little simplistic.He is replicating a process that was normally done on paper using a few pencils. An active digitizer is needed for precision, but beyond that all the credit goes to the talent of the artist.
Says what consensus?iPad Pro + Apple Pencil is now fully surpassed by the new Surface Pro.