Or you're aged out of it.bro no one actually uses threads. its only activity is due to instagram users being pushed to view a thread.
X is the goat of social media.
(haters gonna go ham on this post)
Hey, I am one of the five people who actually liked that service.Threads is the modern day Google+.
Yes, because the name X is stupid, and ridiculously generic.Do we still need “formerly Twitter”? It’s been years.
I think that is the key. They do the same with Facebook. I sometimes click on the comments button because I can’t help myself and occasionally without even realizing it’s a threads post, I click, and oops I’m now a Threads “active user”. LolPeople who use Instagram. Instagram displays Threads posts in the Instagram feed so one click you're in Threads.
Meta's Threads has now reportedly surpassed its rival X (formerly Twitter) in daily mobile usage globally.
![]()
Market intelligence firm Similarweb (via TechCrunch) reports that Threads recorded 141.5 million daily active users across iOS and Android worldwide as of January 7, 2026, compared with 125 million daily active mobile users for X.
The data indicates that Threads crossed ahead of X on mobile sometime between late October and early November 2025, following a prolonged period of steady growth rather than a sudden spike. While X continues to attract more mobile users than Threads in the United States, Similarweb estimates that X's U.S. daily active mobile user base has declined significantly, falling to roughly half of what it was a year earlier, as Threads continues to gain ground.
Despite Threads' gains on mobile, Similarweb's data shows that X maintains a decisive lead when web usage is included. As of January 13, 2026, X was attracting an estimated 145.4 million daily web visitors, compared with approximately 8.5 million daily web visitors for Threads. When mobile and web audiences are combined, X is estimated to exceed 270 million daily users, while Threads totals roughly 150 million daily users across platforms.
Article Link: Threads Usage Overtakes X on Mobile
I think it should be written “Twitter (currently X)”.Yes, because the name X is stupid, and ridiculously generic.
I suppose that’s a good thing: Better to not be thought of at all than to be thought of as regime media promoting AI-generated CSAM to an audience increasingly comprised of just bots and, of the few humans, some of the worst on the planet.I find these usage figure suspicious.
Threads has almost no cultural effect, no-one cares what you write on threads, it is not in any way part of the zeitgeist of world ideas.
Let’s just keep calling it twitter. X is not a great name, no matter how bad Musk wants a company to be named X.Do we still need “formerly Twitter”? It’s been years.
I would simply attest them a combination of curiosity, FOMO and an obsession with recognition.(...) How the population got addicted to this thing called social media might be a mystery to historians one day. LOL
I agree about 'formerly Twitter' being stupid, just calling it Twitter is entirely sufficient.I have never seen anyone use threads, nor talk about threads and I am heavily in a tech business. Also "formerly Twitter" at this point is stupid, its been four years.
I would have said that a year or so ago, but now it bares no resemblance to the Twitter community that it once was.I agree about 'formerly Twitter' being stupid, just calling it Twitter is entirely sufficient.
If you read the article you'll see that the opposite is happening.Surprised to see these numbers. Think overall in the future, number of users on X should increase.