It's all these hidden things that upset customers, and rightfully so. Much like the iPhone 7's different modems, iPhone 6s's A9 chips, etc.
How many actually need that bandwidth on even ONE port much less 3 to 4? And are actually in the market for the 13" Pro right now? How many were truly planning to get the 13" and hook up 4 TB3 devices that need that bandwidth? How many pay zero attention to far more significant positives, from screen quality to giant trackpad?
The 15" has all 4 at full speed according to this article.Anyone know why this is? Could kaby lake fix this so that all 4 ports have thunderbolt 3?
Heh, the whining is almost comical at this point. Of course I'll be called a McPologist!
This is nothing new anyway, the previous smaller MacBooks (Airs, etc) had reduced Thunderbolt functionality over the larger pros. The cylinder Mac Pro doesn't have Thunderbolt 2 on all 6 ports, it divides 3 TB buses among them. So, the 13" MacBook Pros probably only have 1 thunderbolt 3 bus instead of 2 on the 15", or some other lesser vs. greater combination (not sure how the TB 3 hardware support works). You should've been complaining about this for years as it's been that way since Thunderbolt was introduced on the smaller devices vs. the larger.
Apple really screwed people who wanted the 13in.
How many actually need that bandwidth on even ONE port much less 3 to 4? And are actually in the market for the 13" Pro right now? How many were truly planning to get the 13" and hook up 4 TB3 devices that need that bandwidth? How many pay zero attention to far more significant positives, from screen quality to giant trackpad?
The most disgusting thing? They used the "Hello." slogan to advertise this crap.
I agree fully on the subject of overall IO. The overall IO Capability exceeds the outgoing model by far.
The only thing I don't like is the "need" for even more adapters now. I could handle buying stuff for TB2 as I still had regular USB and could chain more USB ports of the TB2 ports. Now they have went for absurdly thin, removing standard USB / TB2, requiring that I juggle more dongles to achieve the same connectivity my 2015 model does.
As others have asked of Apple in the other thread, would it have hurt for them to make it slightly thicker, given us some legacy ports, more battery, and perhaps offer a BTO version with 32GB or more RAM?
I don't think death to Apple at this point, but, this update has a few items that have put the brakes on my ordering a new laptop.
Well this is rather confusing for people who have no idea whether an item is a 15 watt and a 7.5 device. End of the day, why did Apple do this? Was it because of some technical limitations? Why did they not make everything just 15 watts? So so confusing, so unlike Apple. This is what Microsoft would do...