don't fall for the "64-bit myth"
It's the most important thing for you, yet you don't know what it does?
First of all, the new 64-bit addressing won't help you since you only have 4 GiB of RAM. The main thing that 64-bit addressing does is allow a *single* program to use more than 4 GiB.
Second, 10.4's 64-bit implementation is a partial implementation that is mainly available to command line terminal apps. No Cocoa/Carbon apps, no GUI apps.
For an application like Photoshop or video to use 64-bit addressing, it would have to be rewritten as a "client-server" app, with a 32-bit GUI talking to a separate 64-bit work piece. Ain't gonna happen, IMO.
The need for 64-bit on the desktop isn't that great, and the need for a lame terminal-only implementation is almost zero on the desktop.
The supercomputer clusters will like 10.4's 64-bit addressing, though....
mk_in_mke said:The most important thing for me is the 64 bits processing...
but: what will 64 bits really bring to me? ...
It's the most important thing for you, yet you don't know what it does?
First of all, the new 64-bit addressing won't help you since you only have 4 GiB of RAM. The main thing that 64-bit addressing does is allow a *single* program to use more than 4 GiB.
Second, 10.4's 64-bit implementation is a partial implementation that is mainly available to command line terminal apps. No Cocoa/Carbon apps, no GUI apps.
For an application like Photoshop or video to use 64-bit addressing, it would have to be rewritten as a "client-server" app, with a 32-bit GUI talking to a separate 64-bit work piece. Ain't gonna happen, IMO.
The need for 64-bit on the desktop isn't that great, and the need for a lame terminal-only implementation is almost zero on the desktop.
The supercomputer clusters will like 10.4's 64-bit addressing, though....