So you’re saying if there is a payment model attached, there is no tracking? I’d say it goes both ways.
I didn't say that at all.
So you’re saying if there is a payment model attached, there is no tracking? I’d say it goes both ways.
If FindMy was a standalone service that is a company’s main product instead of a feature in almost all of Apple’s products? Definitely, in that scenario you are the product. But seeing as it’s basically a feature to sell Apple hardware, that argument doesn’t stand.AirTag tracking is free too after you buy the hardware. Are you saying customers are the product in that transaction too?
Okay, so let’s use a different example: iTunes. I don’t need Apple hardware or anything to use it. Am I now the product? Who is Apple selling my data to?If FindMy was a standalone service that is a company’s main product instead of a feature in almost all of Apple’s products? Definitely, in that scenario you are the product. But seeing as it’s basically a feature to sell Apple hardware, that argument doesn’t stand.
You didn’t understand the scope of my original post. I’m speaking specifically to as close to a global standard as possible. Not just what the EU decided upon.The EU has such rules.
Unfortunately such standards will never happen, because it would destroy the fundamental business model of powerful behemoths such as Google and Facebook. One can only dream, however.And this is why we need a Geneva Convention level standard for data acquisition, sharing, and deletion amongst as many nations as possible. The genie has long left the bottle, the horse left the barn in another country, etc. Only way to get it back is to apply standards, regulations, and teeth to those entrusted with data. It's a royal pain in the &&& to do it but these companies have proved they are either not capable or willing to do it themselves.
I definitely don’t expect it in my life time. And there are powerful players against the concept, as you said. Perhaps when enough issues arise and people demand change something will happen. But, again, not in my lifetime.Unfortunately such standards will never happen, because it would destroy the fundamental business model of powerful behemoths such as Google and Facebook. One can only dream, however.
Yes, but surely you need hardware to actually track. I get the difference here, my point was that this "if it's free you're the product" generalisation that's parroted over and over is dumb. Bad companies will do bad things with your data whether their service is free or not.
That's literally Apple's business model—sell you the hardware and provide the software for free. This is a dumb generalisation that people need to stop repeating.
What hardware? Life360 is a free downloadable app. This has nothing to do with Tile besides the fact Life360 just acquired Tile.
It is not a dumb generalization. To put it plainly, companies exist to make money. When you pay for something, the company makes money from the sale of the product or service to you. However, when you DON’T pay for something, the company still needs to make money some other way. In Tech, this usually means monetizing the relationship with the customer, whether it is selling their data, through ad revenue, etc. Quite literally, you are the product, and the customer is another interested third-party.Yes, but surely you need hardware to actually track. I get the difference here, my point was that this "if it's free you're the product" generalisation that's parroted over and over is dumb. Bad companies will do bad things with your data whether their service is free or not.
That's literally Apple's business model—sell you the hardware and provide the software for free. This is a dumb generalisation that people need to stop repeating.
This is excellent advice. Just to save some time for anyone wanting to do this:If you care about your privacy: Don’t wait.
Ditch it now and request your account be deleted before Life360 takes ownership of the data.
Ok....your take is concerning to me. If this article were about apple selling the tracking data to underwrite a product offering, then sure. But please tell me you can see the difference!AirTag tracking is free too after you buy the hardware. Are you saying customers are the product in that transaction too?
This is not about whether you are paying for hardware! My god. This is about whether your location data is being sold or not... The CEO is saying their business model relies on selling location data. So that is my problem. He straight up says it. Its in the article.You can keep pasting that over and over, but the physical hardware is NOT free.
My initial comment wasn’t even about the article, it was about the dumb generalisation that some random user posted. But apparently if anything is perceived as possibly not being completely pro-Apple then context doesn’t matter.Ok....your take is concerning to me. If this article were about apple selling the tracking data to underwrite a product offering, then sure. But please tell me you can see the difference!
Murica ??I have three Tiles for keys, wallet and laptop bag and I like them but… if life360 purchase of Tile is finalized, I’ll get rid of them and purchase 3 AirTags.
The difference is whether apple is selling that location data, and if that is a core business strategy of theirs! Dude! Look at the difference.Find My is free too. Am I Apple’s product? No, so that pseudo-intellectual point that people love to drag out doesn’t hold up.
Note that nowhere have I defended Life360. I don’t know much about the company, I don’t use them. All I’m saying it that this stupid generalisation is stupid, whether it applies in this case or not.
I made the comment. It absolutely applies. If you don't see it that way, I can't change your mind. But the prevailing wisdom is that this business is selling user location data WITHOUT common understanding by those users that it's happening. This is a betrayal of trust.My initial comment wasn’t even about the article, it was about the dumb generalisation that some random user posted. But apparently if anything is perceived as possibly not being completely pro-Apple then context doesn’t matter.
I’m not disputing that. How many time must I say it? The only thing I’m arguing is that “if it’s free you’re the product” is a bad generalisation. I’m done repeating myself, but if you want to keep arguing against points I’m not making then be my guest.I made the comment. It absolutely applies. If you don't see it that way, I can't change your mind. But the prevailing wisdom is that this business is selling user location data WITHOUT common understanding by those users that it's happening. This is a betrayal of trust.