Trust me, Tim doesn't care that he has your ears.
Probably not. He seems to have born with a pair of his own.
Trust me, Tim doesn't care that he has your ears.
Steve wouldn't have done this. He probably would have written something like:
"We got 'em!
Sent from my iPad" and then go back to doing Steve-stuff.
Still, isn't a lot of this copy and paste from the press release?
Were Apple fans. I love all my Apple products, but I am now done with this company that is trying to sue there way into a monopoly. I will keep what I have, but will not be purchasing anything new from them. I know I will get negative comments since I didn't give Apple praise, and the faithful do not look past thesymbol.
So what happens with the sales of Samsung devices?
Whether Tim Cook or a writer authored this, the bottom line is that it was done with finess, appreciation, thoughtfulness and class.
They aren't trying to sue their way to a monopoly. They are simply protecting themselves against being double-crossed by one of their biggest suppliers (Samsung) and a former board member (Google).
Apple entered into cross-licensing agreements with Microsoft on the Surface, which to me presents a bigger threat to the iPad than all the Android tablets put together. I think they are OK with fair competition, but don't like it when "partners" turn on them the way Samsung did.
Were Apple fans. I love all my Apple products, but I am now done with this company that is trying to sue there way into a monopoly. I will keep what I have, but will not be purchasing anything new from them. I know I will get negative comments since I didn't give Apple praise, and the faithful do not look past thesymbol.
Were Apple fans. I love all my Apple products, but I am now done with this company that is trying to sue there way into a monopoly. I will keep what I have, but will not be purchasing anything new from them. I know I will get negative comments since I didn't give Apple praise, and the faithful do not look past thesymbol.
They aren't trying to sue their way to a monopoly. They are simply protecting themselves against being double-crossed by one of their biggest suppliers (Samsung) and a former board member (Google).
Apple entered into cross-licensing agreements with Microsoft on the Surface, which to me presents a bigger threat to the iPad than all the Android tablets put together. I think they are OK with fair competition, but don't like it when "partners" turn on them the way Samsung did.
You prefer copying over innovating? That's too bad.
Watch what happens if the Surface or Windows Phone becomes super popular, they'll attempt to find a loophole to pull the cross licensing on the Surface and the Windows Phones ( tho I don't think they have any for Windows Phone, its VERY different ), then sue Microsoft and say they invented everything on the Surface/Windows Phone.
" Its a rectangle with a touch screen! THEY STOLE IT! "
Apple has 0 interest in actually competing by making products. We already see what a pile of fail the iPhone 5 will be.
What happened to the company that made phones I wanted to buy?
----------
So, other than looking like a rectangle.
They run different OS's, use different hardware, have a different amount of buttons, are different sizes, use different apps, and aren't even made of the same material?
Yes, copying!
For those who wish to read Samsung's statement.
"Todays verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer. It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices.
Watch what happens if the Surface or Windows Phone becomes super popular, they'll attempt to find a loophole to pull the cross licensing on the Surface and the Windows Phones ( tho I don't think they have any for Windows Phone, its VERY different ), then sue Microsoft and say they invented everything on the Surface/Windows Phone.
" Its a rectangle with a touch screen! THEY STOLE IT! "
Apple has 0 interest in actually competing by making products. We already see what a pile of fail the iPhone 5 will be.
So, other than looking like a rectangle.
They run different OS's, use different hardware, have a different amount of buttons, are different sizes, use different apps, and aren't even made of the same material?
Yes, copying!
Hopefully not icecream sandwiches, though.
Were Apple fans. I love all my Apple products, but I am now done with this company that is trying to sue there way into a monopoly. I will keep what I have, but will not be purchasing anything new from them. I know I will get negative comments since I didn't give Apple praise, and the faithful do not look past thesymbol.
Watch what happens if the Surface or Windows Phone becomes super popular, they'll attempt to find a loophole to pull the cross licensing on the Surface and the Windows Phones ( tho I don't think they have any for Windows Phone, its VERY different ), then sue Microsoft and say they invented everything on the Surface/Windows Phone.
" Its a rectangle with a touch screen! THEY STOLE IT! "
Apple has 0 interest in actually competing by making products. We already see what a pile of fail the iPhone 5 will be.
What happened to the company that made phones I wanted to buy?
----------
So, other than looking like a rectangle.
They run different OS's, use different hardware, have a different amount of buttons, are different sizes, use different apps, and aren't even made of the same material?
Yes, copying!
So, I'm taking it that I can have your place in the line at the Apple store for the 5?