Rychiar
macrumors 68040
if only Sony thought so lolHave you tried the Sony PSVR2 ? it's phenomenal
if only Sony thought so lolHave you tried the Sony PSVR2 ? it's phenomenal
what's wrong with social isolation. it's nice to get away from people lol.Price is not the only thing keeping it from being mass market.
The fact that you have to socially isolate yourself with it is probably the biggest problem. Even if it drops to $1,500 and prep time to wear is near zero, people will be asking whether they want to strap on a computer with an iPad interface and block out the world.
Hardly an iPad interface. The fact you can run nearly as many apps as you want at the same time makes this beyond an iPadPrice is not the only thing keeping it from being mass market.
The fact that you have to socially isolate yourself with it is probably the biggest problem. Even if it drops to $1,500 and prep time to wear is near zero, people will be asking whether they want to strap on a computer with an iPad interface and block out the world.
As soon as I saw the size of it, regardless of cost I knew I'd never buy one. Now admittedly I've never actually tried the Apple one on but I've tried other VR headsets and for me they're just ridiculously uncomfortable to use.We all knew it wasn't a mass market product. But glad he is acknowledging it.
I am a Vision Pro owner, and I've been decreasingly "excited" about the product line as a whole. I have mixed feelings. On one hand, it's an amazing device with top of the line technology, but on the other the App Store and content situation has not improved and has gotten worse in some ways. A lot of apps have been abandoned, a lot of critical ones are still missing, and many barely get updates. It's incredibly nice for occassional media consumption (such as immersive video) - of which Apple TV+ still lacks a lot of!
Ultimately, the success of Vision Pro is heavily dependent on the App Store and content. Price as well, but I'd argue it's less so. Content was the inflection point with the iPhone and the iPad. I hoped to see some of that progress, but I am disappointed to not have seen it. And Apple's hostile relationship with developers in recent years is of no help.
The original Mac, early adapter at $10,000 in today’s dollars. Vision Pro cheap compared to the original Mac.
When the wife says turn that TV off, kids are going to bed, one example.Price is not the only thing keeping it from being mass market.
The fact that you have to socially isolate yourself with it is probably the biggest problem. Even if it drops to $1,500 and prep time to wear is near zero, people will be asking whether they want to strap on a computer with an iPad interface and block out the world.
"Admits" is such a loaded click-bait word to use. Maybe unintentional, but I like Mac Rumors because it's not as cheap and dramatic as the other sites. Was Tim hiding this info, or did we all know it was the case?
You don't say......lollllllllllllllUltimately, the success of Vision Pro is heavily dependent on the App Store and content.
Just like all of the new "features" the new 16 Pro were supposed to come with that are now...."coming soon"Wow, that's quite the change marketing. When the AVP was announced, Apple said, "The era of spatial computing is here." Now they are saying, "Hey, this is an early adopter product. The era is tomorrow, not today."
TlDr: it’s a beta product. Has been since the beginning.
From what I know it's great hardware, Apple just doesn't have the content or justification to support the need to buy it. I always assumed Sony would crack the VR space with gaming, but not yet.
AVP was never a mass-market iPhone-type device. However many folks insist on pretending that it is one, just so they can claim "fail." Personally I do not respect those folks and their lack of vision [pun intended].
The Wall Street Journal's Ben Cohen this summer interviewed Apple CEO Tim Cook about the Vision Pro, innovation, Apple Intelligence, and more.
![]()
Image Credit: Vanity Fair
Cook admitted that the Vision Pro headset is not a mass-market product due to its high price.
"At $3,500, it's not a mass-market product," said Cook. "Right now, it's an early-adopter product. People who want to have tomorrow's technology today—that's who it's for. Fortunately, there's enough people who are in that camp that it's exciting."
In July, research firm IDC estimated that Vision Pro sales would be under 500,000 units this year.
Cohen said Apple's approach to innovation can be described in four words: "Not first, but best."
"We're perfectly fine with not being first," said Cook. "As it turns out, it takes a while to get it really great. It takes a lot of iteration. It takes worrying about every detail. Sometimes, it takes a little longer to do that. We would rather come out with that kind of product and that kind of contribution to people versus running to get something out first. If we can do both, that's fantastic. But if we can only do one, there's no doubt around here. If you talk to 100 people, 100 of them would tell you: It's about being the best."
Cook said Apple Intelligence makes the experience of using Apple products "profoundly different."
"I think we'll look back and it will be one of these air pockets that happened to get you on a different technology curve," said Cook.
The wide-ranging interview touches on many other topics, including Cook's daily routine, lessons he learned from Steve Jobs, and more.
Bloomberg today also published a story about Cook's role on Nike's board of directors, which he joined in 2005. The report states that Cook supported the appointment of Elliott Hill as Nike's new CEO this month, after the shoe maker experienced declining sales and profit this year. Cook is often spotted wearing Nike shoes, and Apple has partnered with Nike on several products and accessories over the past few decades.
Article Link: Tim Cook Admits Truth About Vision Pro Following Lackluster Sales
It’s a lot of work to put it on. Sure it takes 5min but in your mind you’re thinking “now I’m separating from everyone around me.What would make the Vision really great was if it actually was a pair of glasses. Unfortunately that product is a decade or more away.
Also I want to add, Apple under Jobs cut the price of the original iPhone in less than a year to boost sales (and cut losses presumably to boost adoption).
Apple has not done this with Vision Pro.
Here's the open letter from Steve Jobs to customers on the logic on reducing iPhone's price:
Since Web Archive takes a trillion years to load sometimes, I have attached it here as a picture too.
View attachment 2440046
The word admit, per Oxford:
“confess to be true or to be the case, typically with reluctance.”
There’s nothing being admitted here. Just another example of MR playing to the popularity of Vision Pro dissent for the sake of clicks / engagement.
Apple hasn't changed anything. So many of you act as though the IOS App store and App market launched fully-formed on the day the iPhone launched. It's revisionist history by omission. VisionOS and apps are going to take some time.A platform is only as good as the software that runs on it. This was true for the Mac, the iPhone, the iPad, now AVP. The only thing that's changed is Apple's attitude towards this fact.
The original iPhone was also a pretty overpriced product for early-adopters, but it sold 1 million units in 74 days.
I think there's a few more truths that Tim really should admit to.![]()
Price is not the only thing keeping it from being mass market.
The fact that you have to socially isolate yourself with it is probably the biggest problem. Even if it drops to $1,500 and prep time to wear is near zero, people will be asking whether they want to strap on a computer with an iPad interface and block out the world.