Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As a US citizen in the UK, I hope that everybody understands that individual US citizens are liable to pay taxes on money they earn overseas. Of course it's reasonable in that there are deductions for taxes paid overseas if there is a tax treaty, but still why should Apple be allowed to avoid the liability by fancy legal footwork? Hmm ... I wonder: I am an academic. If I set up a research company in Ireland, and have my University (and various companies from time to time) who pay my salary pay this company, I wonder if I would be allowed to avoid paying reasonable UK and US tax. Like Apple.

First, I find it most ridiculous that the USA wants people living outside the USA to pay US taxes on non-US income. The USA are quite unique in that.

Second, you should feel absolutely free to set up a company in the UK. There's a problem with "universities paying your salary to your company"; you would have to set up a deal so the company enters a contract with the university to do work for them and gets paid for the work; the university would not be allowed to give you orders, because you are supposed to be an independent entrepreneur, and they most certainly couldn't pay you a salary. Once you've done that, the company pays you a small salary, puts any amount up to £40,000 a year into a pension fund for you absolutely tax free, pays 20% corporation tax on the rest, and pays you dividends every 3 or 6 months.

Setting up a company in Ireland? That would make life too "interesting" for my taste.
 
Oh damn! I like seeing this business aggressive side of Tim. This I think is what happens in meetings with the executives, and we usually don't get to see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Corporate tax is a big issue. Kinda off topic but that's the reason why so many US businesses are moving to Texas because of the low state taxes. Part of Apple resides in Texas.

We've seen the biggest tech growth down here which is making Texas a very wealthy state vs California which is taxing the crap out of everyone. Toyota is moving here from Cal.
I've noticed a increased population in Dallas in just 4 years. Kinda annoyed by the masses of people but the economy is good.
Housing market is unbelievable!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Just to add some perspective on this... A big pharm company was convicted of using paid speeches to doctors in order to get those doctors to prescribe their product. Rich people setup up a foundation to avoid taxes. Most think these rich people are doing something great for people, yet the people get very little benefit from the money, sometimes less than 10% of the money goes to the target people.

This is how the people in Washington work, they don't take bribes, they get insider trading, paid speeches for favors, foundation donations. While the rich setup foundations where they pay themselves tax free.

This shouldn't surprise anyone that's been around for a while, it's common and been around for all of time. They've gone from gangsters with tommy guns offering "protection" to passing laws for cash.

At least Apple is creating a few jobs and opening new business models.
Yes, that's another reason for wealthy folks to setup charities and foundations. It's the legal method to launder their profits and earn goodwill at the same time. Win/win!... although on second thought...
 
You don't understand the economics. Lower tax rates bring in more revenue. Higher tax rates bring in less revenue. That sounds counterintuitive, I know, but that's the way it works. The reason the overseas money is being "hoarded" is because the tax of 40% is too high. That high rate is DISINCENTIVE. So the money sits and does nothing, and the government gets nothing. If the tax was lowered to a more reasonable 15% or 20%, then the money would come back, and a piece would be taxed and go into the federal treasury.

So it is very simple. 40% tax rate, money stays put and zero revenue to the US treasury. 20% tax rate, money can move back and the US treasury can get some revenue. Which do you want?
There are two points on the inverted bell curve where the tax receivable is the same, and in the centre is the sweet spot of maximum revenue. 40% is not at all high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Then why don't they change the laws?

Apple will do exactly what the laws say.

But if there's anything extra you think Apple should do... you might wanna make that into a law in order to make them do it.

Otherwise... Apple is gonna do just what they have to do... and you'll be stuck complaining about it... thinking they should do more.
Do you hate loopholes? THEN GET RID OF THE LOOPHOLES. Eliminate the reason that thousands of companies set up offices in Ireland or whatever.

You can't blame the wild animals for entering your house when you left the door open.

Also... if Apple broke laws... why aren't they being punished? That's what usually happens.

I have seen enough movies to know that the CEO can be taken away in handcuffs for breaking the law.
I am not a lawmaker! I do not make the law! I want the loopholes closed as much as the next person. Perhaps it's Apple's lobbying that stops them from being closed?

I never said Apple broke the law. Ever. They just don't follow the law plain and simple. They would not be doing anything extra, they would be doing what they should simply be doing. Using loopholes is doing something extra and complex.
 
For the record, the President came to him, because he wanted to glob onto his celebrity.

Your rationale is insane, quite honestly. You owe no government a moral obligation to pay them more than you're legally bound to do. Apple's "moral obligation" is met when they legally pay their taxes. Frankly, they show good citizenship by publicly telling the government why it is that their laws are counterproductive.

When was the last time you paid the government more than your legally mandated tax burden, "just because it was the right thing to do?"

People who get all up in arms about this lose sight of the fact that it is not about the amount, but the principle. I utilize every advantage I can as written in the tax laws to maximize my tax savings. For me, it generally only saves me hundreds of dollars, not billions. But I do it because I have the resources to know what the laws are, and I utilize them. My resources are that I possess the diligence and cognizance necessary to find the laws that are in my favor, and use them. Just because my next door neighbor might not possess those same resources does not make me less moral.

I believe one of the issues with this debate is a total lack of universal experience. I live in a country that was founded on the principle that government should serve and be accountable to its citizenry. While it is not perfect, and we often do not achieve that goal, the basic tenants of our constitution are that the rule of law governs us. A set of rules were laid out that places our government on the same level of legal footing as its citizens. This means that they are just as prone to bear the brunt of their own stupidity and shortsightedness as any individual. The current US tax code is an example of our government paying the price for their own stupidity and shortsightedness. The beauty of our current situation is that the global economy has placed the government in a rather precarious position, in that they are being forced to compete. If they try to change the laws in order to fit their fiscal gluttony they face the potential of losing prominent corporate citizens.

Many of those in this forum who are chastising Apple for following their country's laws to their advantage live in a monarchy, where for thousands of years a constant line of inbreeds have been exalted as "higher beings" since the days when they were considered near deities. Their view of the world seems to be that the citizenry should serve the government, rather than the other way around.

And yet I bet you complain about the local facilities, state of the roads and probably don't even think twice about your daily comute to work , and how much of the services and infrastructure is funded by taxes. So care to explain why YOU should pay less than those others that subsidise your life style? Cause you are special ? Why should your next door neighbor pay his share for the same services you use , and you dodge your share.... Cause morally you use it less, knowing you avoided some taxes.....no! It's all about me , me, myself , and I eh?

People who avoid tax and lecture others on morals are the biggest hypocrites.

Go ahead, do it for greed, and to benefit yourself but don't BS how it's morally right !

The universal issue in this debate is selfish people who pretend tax avoidance is thier right cause they are educated and have the resources to exploit it.... And that the whole problem is the government. First world problems!

Call a spade a spade!

I stated earlier, I don't care that apple is using tax avoidance , thier choice to maximize profit, I care about Tim Cook pretending he and apple care about injustice, social issues , sexism , racism etc, and the hypocrite avoids tax that would find government initiatives to support these issues. Just shut up, stop pretending, and focus on shareholder revenue , cause that's what it's all about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
No they don't. Don't be clueless.

The second statement refers to bringing the money they have over seas into the United States. They don't HAVE to do that. They are free to keep their money overseas right where it is. There is no Evasion going on here.

His problem with that is that it would cost him 40% of that money to bring it into the US because are tax system is such a total mess that we make companies pay taxes to bring money they made in other places into the country.

It should be FREE to do that. That money only benefits the country by being here instead of there.

The first comment regarding the tax avoidance issues are other matters and have nothing to do with the money they have in banks overseas.

Not bad but a very narrowed view. The issue is far beyond the USA (we are one of many of varying degrees in this schema). Executing the model you are describing would bankrupt this country in a heartbeat.


Immoral?

Screwing your brother's wife is immoral.
Stealing money from your child's piggybank is immoral.
Strangling your sister is immoral.

This is far from immoral.

Not at all. Looks like he hit the definition spot on.
im·mor·al
i(m)ˈmôrəl/
adjective
  1. not conforming to accepted standards of morality.
    "an immoral and unwinnable war"
    synonyms: unethical, bad, morally wrong, wrongful, wicked, evil, foul, unprincipled,unscrupulous, dishonorable, dishonest, unconscionable, iniquitous,disreputable, corrupt, depraved, vile, villainous, nefarious, base,miscreant; More
 
Last edited:
First, I find it most ridiculous that the USA wants people living outside the USA to pay US taxes on non-US income. The USA are quite unique in that.

These and other corporate and personal taxation issues will have to be part of WTO at some point. The current inconsistencies among countries are just too great, inviting all kinds of games.
 
lol @ armchair economists trying to defend Cook or any other high level CEO for this type of nonsense.
This is what they're doing:
They send their money to India, southeast Asia, Israel and France. Most of those countries have no regulations on labor or minimum wage or public health programs or occupational health requirements, so they can pay their international branches to "contract" their manufacturing and assembly requirements.
It's not "Apple" that's manufacturing and producing iPhones in China, it's not even Foxconn. Foxconn is a semiconductor and component manufacturing corporation. They design and produce the tooling components used to assemble iPhone and Mac logic boards, along with manufacturing of the logic boards themselves.
Smaller private companies are the ones that are contracted to do the "**** work", that pays little, offers little benefits or incentives and exploits its workers for 16 hour work shifts.
The tax incentives are just part of the picture, but the preferable scapegoat they need to avert attention from the overall picture and that is that it's much much cheaper to manufacture overseas than it is here.
They're stockpiling money, they don't give a **** about the "American people". At least, not those of the American people that aren't credentialed, technical, educated specialists (engineers, computer scientists, technical writers, marketing managers, etc). They definitely pay top money to keep good technical talent here in the United States, but a lot of that is due to security vulnerability (you can't trust that your overseas employees will keep your trade secrets, 'secret') and also because most of our technical specialists are just better trained.
But blue collar work? It'll be a cold day in Hell before you see any of the big companies putting any of their manual labor on domestic soil. And to be honest, I kind of half don't blame them: Unionized blue collar workers earn more than entry level engineers and are a royal pain in the rear to fire.
You might say, "Oh, well good for them, they're fighting for fair labor rights!"
Yeah... When they succeed. But you can't win a fight when the other side doesn't even show up. And the percentage of Google, Apple, Microsoft or General Electric employees that are unionized is an extremely compelling argument to how much those companies are winning the fight against Unions.
 
in one sentence he says, that he doesn't want to pay taxes in the u.s. because they'd be too high, in the other one he says that the accusation of tax avoidance is total political crap.


that sounds like total political crap to me. either say it out loud that you'll go where you pay the least taxes, so the least people can benefit from those taxes, or pay your taxes, no matter, how high.

dark side or light, responibility they should take.

Or start something to change the tax issue.
Then again, TC is a black dot on a really big white wall.


Why give 40% of the money they worked for to the Empire when they could just hold on to it? It's their responsibility to minimize their tax burden. Just as it is for you to take as much deductions as you can. Unless, of course, you volunteer to pay without taking any deductions and you pay all state sales tax on online purchases?

Anyone have a handy state tax pay guideline that is 1oo% correct? :D
 
Last edited:
Oh damn! I like seeing this business aggressive side of Tim. This I think is what happens in meetings with the executives, and we usually don't get to see it.
This is what I think of as "16GB Tim." This is the Tim Cook who has the gall to look like he's showing off photos of his grandchildren when presenting a lineup of iPhones that start at 16GB in storage despite being designed for taking 4K video. I'm beginning to see what Steve Jobs saw in him, after all.
 
If you pay 40% of your earnings to the UK government, then I'd love to make as much money as you do (over £350,000 a year).

It's 45% over £150k ;)

What people need to remember is the more companies such as apple, amazon and starbucks etc avoid tax, the more we have to pay in our taxes to make up the shortfall. I'm really hoping the EU digs it teeth deep into apple and stops them avoiding local taxes via loop holes. I've no issues with them not paying US tax on earning in other countries, but they must pay tax on all earning in those local counties at the full weight of tax..
 
Amazing how many feel entitled to the labors of others. I dare any of you to earn a fortune and then hand over 40% to the Fed when there are tax loopholes that will help you avoid it. It's unreasonable and you'd be daft not to exploit those loopholes. Any of you would do the same.

The majority of Americans elected a guy who had an official policy of "sharing the wealth". He was elected twice. My taxes have increased substantially in the past 7 years. My wealth has been increasingly redistributed to others as an official American policy, endorsed by rocket scientists like Tim Cook and all of the rest of the liberal creeps in the Apple universe, who are now suddenly against people feeling "entitled to the labor of others".

Funny how that works.
 
If all these uber-rich industrialist/investor class/ruling class-type people don;t want to pay taxes... if all these regular working people don;t want to pay taxes.... if the poor don;t want to pay taxes.... if no one wants to pay taxes, why don;t people like Cook just LOBBY TO STOP TAXATION and thus break down government so there will not be such time wasting idiocy in all our lives?

Instead he (and his 1% pals) lobby for more regulation and taxes. Insanity (or mendacity) is their calling card and lingering odor.
 
The majority of Americans elected a guy who had an official policy of "sharing the wealth". He was elected twice. My taxes have increased substantially in the past 7 years. My wealth has been increasingly redistributed to others as an official American policy, endorsed by rocket scientists like Tim Cook and all of the rest of the liberal creeps in the Apple universe, who are now suddenly against people feeling "entitled to the labor of others".

Funny how that works.


?
 
It's total political cr*p because congress critters could change the laws and take away some of these perfectly legal loopholes (that many use themselves on their own investments and tax returns!).

But they won't, because it would piss off many of their biggest party and reelection campaign donors. So they just lie and encourage some of you robin-hoods to say that Apple is "cheating" to fool you into voting for their reelection. And do nothing about the silly tax laws. That's political cr*p.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
I like Apple in most regards, but in this regard Tim Cook is really trying it on. Is Apple tax haven legal? Yes. Is it immoral? Yes.

It all comes down to looking for number one. Whenever I hear a socialist government screaming about a large corporations not paying taxes, it is all a political power struggle. Who affects society?

Do you want some old money croneys cashing in on no-bid government contracts and their social engineers with some skewed view of equality calling the shots with mainstream media?

Do you want anyone from any part of society making a great product, gaining market share and displacing old money calling the shots with alternative media?

In the states, we are seeing a huge shift in old money loosing their government monopoly cash flow with Uber and AirBnB tapping right into the cash veins of these cronies. Cable Television use is in decline and no matter what mainstream media says, they are not affecting Presidential candidate survey polls. This is why Democrats are allowing types like Bernie Sanders come to the limelight, they want to institute their old ways in socialism the same way European Royal families and the like socialized most of Europe during the Marshall Plan.

As usual, the Burgermeister Meisterburger goes away when their plans for society are no longer solvent and their tax revenue stream dies off. Sometimes with a whimper, sometimes with their last ammunition box empty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrxak
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.