Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Your logic and vitriol baffles me, but that seems to be a regular occurrence here. :rolleyes:

You are correct about the vitriol. I apologize and take it back.

But I also don't understand your logic. I'll try to keep an open mind if you can explain how a tax deduction would make a charitable donation "not cost in the long run".
 
You are correct about the vitriol. I apologize and take it back.

But I also don't understand your logic. I'll try to keep an open mind if you can explain how a tax deduction would make a charitable donation "not cost in the long run".

Okay, when I was working as a consultant, my accountant used to have me donate about $25-30K a year to keep me in a lower tax bracket. Which saved me about $10K per annum. Wouldn't the same apply for those with even more wealth? Just on a bigger scale. :confused:
 
Okay, when I was working as a consultant, my accountant used to have me donate about $25-30K a year to keep me in a lower tax bracket. Which saved me about $10K per annum. Wouldn't the same apply for those with even more wealth? Just on a bigger scale. :confused:

The tax rate in a tax bracket only applies to each dollar earned within that bracket. An example helps. Let's say $50,000 and under was taxed at 10% and $50,000.01 and over was taxed at 20%. If you earned $100,000, the first half would be taxed at 10% and second half would be taxed at 20%.

Many people mistakenly think that bumping into a higher bracket means the higher rate applies to all of the income. In other words, if you made $50,000 and paid $5,000 in tax, a small $1000 raise would be disastrous because you'd pay $10,200, for a net loss of $5,200. In that scenario, you would want to donate $1000 in order to get into a lower tax bracket and only pay $5000 again.

Well, I'm speaking for the USA anyway; I don't know how it works in Australia. If you had a professional accountant, I have to assume brackets don't work the same way in Australia.
 
The tax rate in a tax bracket only applies to each dollar earned within that bracket. An example helps. Let's say $50,000 and under was taxed at 10% and $50,000.01 and over was taxed at 20%. If you earned $100,000, the first half would be taxed at 10% and second half would be taxed at 20%.

That rings a bell for me, from one of her explanations to me.

I don't know how it worked, just that I got roughly 1/3 of what I donated back again and that all ongoing education and equipment expenses were claimed back over three years.

Sorry for being off topic. :eek:
 
Bids are now over $200K. Most expensive cup of coffee anyone may ever drink. Makes Starbucks look cheap.

Bid now on this unique opportunity to have coffee with Apple CEO Tim Cook at Apple headquarters.
 
Bids are now over $200K. Most expensive cup of coffee anyone may ever drink. Makes Starbucks look cheap.

Not cheap...just bad.:(

Since coffee seems to be the issue here, my guess is Cook has a half way decent coffee maker in his office.

Just a guess...:p
 
I get if it would be coffee with Jobs, but Tim Cook? The way of his slow speach, you would be happy if he would make 2 whole sentences in 30 minutes :) Way to spend 500k dollars :)
 
Is it just my twisted mind, or are all the jokes you can make about this wildly inappropriate, yet somewhat critical towards the demands of the stock market?

But I guess a cup of coffee with the Woz would be more entertaining than this anyways.
 
Last edited:
They should have auctioned an Ouji Board session with Steve Jobs. That would have attracted major bucks!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.