Ok, does anyone else think it's odd that the charity is for justice and human rights when Apple gets a lot of it's stuff from China, who is one of the wort violators of Human Rights?
If you had checked, you would have found that Apple is probably the one western business in the world that does most to improve working conditions and payments in China, so there is no contradiction here at all.
----------
Charitable donations are claimed back on tax, so it doesn't really cost in the long run. Plus you get all the publicity for being so generous...
If I donate money, I can deduct it from tax. But that just means I can pay a donation from my salary before tax, not from my salary after tax. Still have less money.
if apple was serious the could choose to do business elsewhere but their greed dosent allow that
If your assumptions were correct that jobs in China are really, really bad, then people there would have the choice between a ****** job and starving. If Apple takes their business elsewhere, that choice is gone and all they can do is starve.
On the other hand, Foxconn pays about the best salaries in the region; people go there from all the poorer regions to work as hard as they can for some time, save all their money, and return home with tons of money. Someone returning home after working 3 years at Foxconn is rich (in the area they move back to); someone working 3 years at McDonalds in the US for three times the salary will have absolutely nothing.
Question: If you are Chinese, you want to become a lawyer, you have zero money, how long do you have to work at Foxconn 60 hours a week to save the money you need for university? Same in the US, how long to you have to work at McDonalds?