Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
70,294
41,911


Apple CEO Tim Cook was in Washington, D.C. today to meet with the House Energy and Commerce Committee about the upcoming App Store Accountability Act, reports Bloomberg. The App Store Accountability Act would require Apple to verify a person's age when an Apple Account is created using a "commercially available method or process," and get parental consent for each app that a child under 16 downloads.

iOS-App-Store-General-Feature-Desaturated.jpg

Cook conveyed to lawmakers that device-level age assurance proposals should not require the collection of sensitive data like birth certificate or social security number, and that parents should be trusted to provide the age of a child when creating a child's account. Any data used for determining age should not be kept by app stores or developers, according to Apple.

Cook also emphasized that age assurance efforts should focus on ensuring parents creating an account are adults, plus he suggested that parents should decide whether a child's age range is shared with developers.

Prior to Cook's meeting with the committee, Apple's global head of privacy, Hilary Ware sent a letter expressing Apple's concerns over the legislation. The letter said that the act "could threaten the privacy of all users by forcing millions of adults to surrender their private information for the simple act of downloading an app." Ware told lawmakers that There are better proposals that help keep kids safe without requiring millions of people to turn over their personal information," touting Apple's age assurance feature that "allows a parent to share their child’s age range with an app developer, without having to share sensitive, specific information like a birthdate or government ID."

Apple has been fighting the App Store Accountability Act because of its privacy concerns, and because it does not want to be legally responsible for verifying user age, obtaining parental consent, or ensuring that developers follow the rules, nor does it want to collect the required documentation.

To head off legislation, Apple has introduced new age assurance features, such as simpler tools for parents to oversee children's Apple accounts, new age categories for app content, and the Declared Age Range API that provides developers with a privacy-forward way to ensure kids aren't exposed to in-app content meant for adults.

Apple has argued that it already has extensive parental controls with Screen Time, and that the legislation would require it to collect excessive amounts of information from all users just to verify the age of children. Apple says that it could be required to collect data like a driver's license, passport, or Social Security number, which is "not in the interest of user safety or privacy."

The House Energy and Commerce Committee will consider the bill on Thursday morning.

Texas recently passed a similar bill, SB2420. Starting on January 1, 2026, Apple users located in Texas will need to confirm whether they are 18 years or older when creating an Apple Account. Apple will need to verify age and parental identity, and the App Store will need to provide additional information to parents.

Update: This article was updated with additional information from Apple on Cook's remarks.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Tim Cook Goes to Washington to Fight App Store Age Verification Legislation
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Starfia
Happy Holidays on this one. Wow. This is going to be very interesting to watch and unfold.
 
This is a distraction tactic and a camel's nose under the tent. It's about government control of everyone's internet access. "Protecting the kids" is the pretense. It's curious that initiatives like this are happening all across the globe at the same time. Papers, please.
 
Apple is against the App Store Accountability Act because it does not want to be legally responsible for verifying user age, obtaining parental consent, or ensuring that developers follow the rules, nor does it want to collect the required documentation.
… Cook pushed lawmakers not to require app store platforms to collect data for age verification purposes, instead suggesting that parents should be providing the age of a child when creating a child's account (which is how account creation works now).
Cowards. They were once happy to scan everyone’s photos for CSAM, but they won’t check ID to help protect young people? Merely proves how much virtue signalling this company is will to throw around.
 
If he only would take the same stand towards his own Apple products.

For years the new Macbook Pro screens are manufactured with micro damages like scratches and dents.

iPhone 17 Pro Max speakers are not shielded properly and therefore make static noises when the device is being charged via USB and using it.
 
I am on Apple's side on this one...

But the important bit is why? I can see reasons, but ultimately I’m not convinced they should govern. I understand the complexity and cost in doing so, but if any company can bear the cost, it is the certain large tech companies. And I think there is a real policy benefit in doing this, just as many others do. Amazon, Costco, Walmart all have to check IDs for certain products that one buys online (and in person).

I think the real issue, beyond the cost of compliance which would not be insignificant but also impact the biggest players least, is that Apple doesn’t want to be seen as the bad guy. That is something I also understand. But Apple already gatekeeps against porn, for example. And certain gambling apps, at least in certain geos. Are you also against such?

If we as a society have, through our representatives, decided to do this and it does not violate the Constitution—which the Supreme Court has indicated it does not—Apple can lobby all it wants. But ultimately needs to start the work to get onboard. So do Google, and others.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mw360
How
This is a distraction tactic and a camel's nose under the tent. It's about government control of everyone's internet access. "Protecting the kids" is the pretense. It's curious that initiatives like this are happening all across the globe at the same time. Papers, please.
One could argue having Apple implement this with Wallet and Face ID would be a way to keep government out of it and also prevent identify theft and harm with 3rd-parties handling ID information.
 
Interesting that Apple seems to have scrubbed “age verification” as a use case when setting up or referring to IDs within Apple Wallet.

The below showed up 3 weeks ago, but now the link under “Learn More” no longer mentions age verification.

IMG_4553.jpeg

EDIT: Support pages changed, but it is still promoted on the overview site.

IMG_7138.jpeg
 
But the important bit is why? I can see reasons m, but ultimately I’m not. I understand the complexity and cost in doing so, but if any company can bear the cost, it is the certain large tech companies. And I think there is a real policy benefit in doing this, just as many others do. Amazon, Costco, Walmart all have to check IDs for certain products that one buys online (and in person).

I think the real issue, beyond the cost of compliance which would not be insignificant but also impact the biggest players least, is that Apple doesn’t want to be seen as the bad guy. That is something I also understand. But Apple already gatekeeps against porn, for example. And certain gambling apps, at least in certain geos. Are you also against such?

If we as a society have, through our representatives, decided to do this and it does not violate the Constitution—which the Supreme Court has indicated it does not—Apple can lobby all it wants. But ultimately needs to start the work to get onboard. So
does Google, and others.
What does age restriction really do?
Does it really make sense that you can drive a vehicle at age 15.5, go to war at age 18 but cannot buy alcohol til age 21?
"We as a society" really needs to re-think of what personal responsibility and ownership means ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
I am on Apple's side on this one...
What is your reasoning?

I am on board with verification for a lot of things.

1) Voting
2) Picking up Rx at the pharmacy.
3) Anything tied to a bank account/card (including Apple's app store).
4) Applying for a credit card.
5) Paying with a credit card at the store/online.
6) Establishing an account that requires sensitive information.

It shouldn't be a big deal to confirm who you are, as long as the information isn't retained after verification.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: vantelimus
What does age restriction really do?
Does it really make sense that you can drive a vehicle at age 15.5, go to war at age 18 but cannot buy alcohol til age 21?
"We as a society" really needs to re-think of what personal responsibility and ownership means ...
There are adults that can take advantage of kids, or kids make stupid decisions, like talk about their home address or where they live with strangers online.

There is also harmful content online that kids shouldn’t have access to. People seem to forget that the Internet is the entire world, that includes people with bad intentions, people that are not mentally well. It’s everyone.

Kids also might not understand the difference between reality and fantasy.

A teen could see a man degrading a woman in a porn and think that’s how they should act and what is expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mw360
That’s like saying beer companies should be responsible for verifying age versus the store selling it. Not buying it.
Where did you get that quote ("It is Apple's opinion that age verification should be the responsibility of app creators") from? The article has been updated, so perhaps it once appeared in the article, but it no longer does.
 
What does age restriction really do?
It helps to ensure that an individual is restricted access to something that, more than likely, they are not mature enough to full comprehend from a real-world view. Actions such as driving a car, drinking alcohol, even voting, are all examples of this - regardless of how well a parent does a commendable job.

Children in particular have less ability to distinguish between reality and fantasy. This is normal for their development, but the issues arise when the fantasy elements distort reality.

The problem here is that, by their own admittance, Apple doesn't want to take responsibility. The reason? Most likely that they don't want to be at the centre of attention if someone was to fool the ID-proofing system.

Read this quote:
The letter said that the act "could threaten the privacy of all users by forcing millions of adults to surrender their private information for the simple act of downloading an app.
Note the use of "surrender"; clever jargon to make the reader feel vulnverable.

This is a terrible excuse. Millions of people have already 'surrendered' their personal information in an extra-ordinate number of ways and have done for years. To get a driving license. Just to set-up various internet accounts on their phone. They continue to surrender their identity when they walk into shops to buy things. They are on CCTV cameras. Members of the public record videos for social media. Data is exchanged 24/7 by large companies.

Parents still need to take responsibility when handing a smart device to a young person - they are responsible for upbringing of their child, not a government - but many of the current restrictions or preventative measures are simply a deterrent rather than an actual check. "Are you X age? Yes/No".
 
What is your reasoning?

I am on board with verification for a lot of things.

1) Voting
2) Picking up Rx at the pharmacy.
3) Anything tied to a bank account/card (including Apple's app store).
4) Applying for a credit card.
5) Paying with a credit card at the store/online.
6) Establishing an account that requires sensitive information.

It shouldn't be a big deal to confirm who you are, as long as the information isn't retained after verification.
I've never once had to upload my driver's license or photo ID for any of those. And only two of them have I had to show photo ID (voting and possibly picking up a prescription). In neither case was my photo ID saved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jarman92
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.