Only if you view this designation as some sort of recognition that a person is great or heroic. It's not and never has been. If you look at the list of past winners, there are heros, monsters, and people who fall decidedly in the middle. It's simply a recognition of a level of influence.Well that's disgusting.
I'm sorry but in no way, shape or form was Tim Cook the most relevant/important/noteworthy person of 2014. These lists are a joke.
Putin? how about Swift? At least Putin could be voted person of the year via "the worst" Swift - be cause she's pretty??? LAme!
Please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please let it not be Taylor Swift, please please please pleeeeeeeeeze.
She goes to a dentist in my office building. I don't like her.
Taylor Swift person of the year ?
Just wow.
that's all I got.
Putin???? Wtf!???? Goodell? Taylor swift? I will never take Time seriously ever again.
Taylor Swift? for what? It's not like she's Elvis or the Beatles completely changing the way we think about music.
I think they nominated Putin just to give it to Swift. Bring him down a peg.
That has to be the worst list of nominees, especially the ferguson "protestors". Seriously?!?!
These are all terrible choices. Taylor Swift, hahaha. Putin??![]()
Not sure if this means no or yes, but Putin was (of that bunch anyway) clearly the most influential person in the world in 2014.
Taylor Swift? Like, OMG really.
If it took Tim coming out officially for anyone to realize the man was gay they are blinder than Stevie Wonder and somehow more deaf than Helen Keller.
That having been said the rest of the list isn't much better. Ferguson protestors? Give me a break. Roger Goddell.... same. Taylor Swift, why? Did she have less boyfriends this year? Ebola caregivers, no offense but this is the JOB you signed up for. Wish I got an award everyday for that.
Honestly of any of what is listed Jack Ma is the most interesting and surprising. His interview about his newfound fame and fortune hit home as him being someone who doesn't want the spotlight or notoriety, he just wants to continue living in peace, do what he loves, and have a decent life. Was pretty and pleasantly surprised to still see a "human being" in a position of power like he is in.
My $.02.
At least Putin has a backbone. Swift .... Wtf?
Cook has been a runner up for Time person of the year right?? Though I would debate that he has actually done much while he has taken over, like flying autopilot. While not a bad thing to be honest, I have to admit innovation has been lacking since Jobs roadmap dried up.
Actually for the Beats deal alone, he should be removed from the list......
Right up there with Taylor Swift and Putin? Wow... Such company.
WTF Taylor Swift and Putin???
Taylor Swift is extremely hot. That's my vote.
Taylor Swift? TAYLOR. SWIFT?
Em ... ok.
Even if it's by influence, not likability (Hitler won in 1938 for example), Swift is not an influential musician. She is yet another bland pop artist of the last few years. She has absolutely nothing to contribute musically, her lyrics are entirely concerning superficial personal matters, and she hasn't done anything remarkable outside of her successful career.
I mean, how could she be nominated for person of the year when people like Richard D. James, Thom Yorke or Marshal Mathers never having won in the past? Love them or hate them, artists like these have had profound influence on contemporary music as a whole.
It would be an embarrassment to humanity to give someone so disposable such high praise.
Swift is not influential musically. She is another bland pop artist in a sea of bland pop artists.
Richard D James? Thom Yorke? Marshal Mathers? Andre 3000? Kanye West?
I don't even like all of those artists but I'll be damned if I didn't admit that they have been hugely influential musically.
Swift does not even deserve to be in the same category as game changers like these.
You are banned.
For life.
![]()
Besides some teeny boppers, precisely who has Taylor Swift influenced? I do not understand her inclusion in this list.
Taylor Swift? LMAO
Is this a joke list? As in, something leaked as satire??? Putin, Goodell, Taylor f'n Swift, Tim Cook. WTH have they done?!?!
Let's skip all the outside stuff and go to the mac part. Why is Tim Cook on here. What has he done besides crunch numbers and hype up a year of unbelievable products which really was just another similar year to any other for Apple?
Look, I love Apple. But let's be real here. Tim Cook has done nothing to deserve this. Yes, he came out about his sexuality. But even he, didn't make a big deal about that and most everyone already knew.
From the people who chose 'you' to be the person of the year in 2006, comes the nominees for 2014, including the Russian president Vladimir Putin, and pop artist Taylor Swift.
The Ebola caregivers certainly couldn't be included, because that is a collective group of people, not one individual.
I'm guessing they will chose someone controversial and illogical from our point of view. If my prediction is true, then it shall be dubbed CRIME Magazine by yours truly.
Please, not Taylor Swift. She got the cover last month, that was enough.
Well that's disgusting.
If anything he was the one, more than anyone else, who kept Jobs and Ive in line from approving products with a 2% profit margin but even better built than what we ended up with. He's always been a numbers guy and continues to be. Can we give him the award based on how many Chinese and Taiwanese families he facilitates great working conditions for and an amazing quality of life at 80-100 hours a week of work for with his number crunching abilities? Waving a rainbow around doesn't mean you still can't be a crook, Cook.
Sorry, I call it like I see it and know it. <stir stir stir>
Taylor Swift was easily the most influential person in music in 2014. Who cares if you don't like her music (I'm personally not a fan). But the facts remain, she was the only artist in the past decade to sell 1.2 million copies of her album within the first week. The runner up for that award in the past 10 years was her previous album in 2012. Most artists these days barely crack 250K with their first week of sales.
When the top selling album of 2014 and 2002 through 2014 suddenly disappears from the number one music streaming platform in the world, along with her back catalogue of albums, it is bound to shake up the music industry. Spotify pays artists cents to the dollar for streaming revenue. Taylor Swift removed her entire catalogue to take a stance against the music giant to renegotiate the way it treats all musicians and how they earn streaming revenue.
Influential is not always synonymous with your particular taste in music. Know the facts.
Not trying to start a war here, so please don't take this as anything other than an interesting discussion
Tim Cook may not be a product guy, or a visionary, but he doesn't have to be, Apple has enough of those, who don't need to be distracted by also being CEO. After all, didn't Cook basically run Apple so Jobs could focus on what he wanted to? So Jobs didn't have to worry about running the nuts and bolts of the company?
'Anti Jobs' moves like the iPhone 5C, or Maps, or bendgate can't be accurately labeled 'anti Jobs'. You've probably seen the internal presentation with reference to 'low cost iPhone based on the iPod touch'. Services isn't Applea strong point: look at MobileMe. And, obviously there's Antennagate which was worse than the over blown iPhone bending stories we heard. Three examples that happened while Steve was CEO.
Didn't Steve have to be forced (for want of a better word) into having third-party apps on the iPhone?
Also, didn't he claim to conceive ideas like a touch keyboard using a multitouch glass display, that weren't his ideas?
Taylor Swift was easily the most influential person in music in 2014. Who cares if you don't like her music (I'm personally not a fan). But the facts remain, she was the only artist in the past decade to sell 1.2 million copies of her album within the first week. The runner up for that award in the past 10 years was her previous album in 2012. Most artists these days barely crack 250K with their first week of sales.
When the top selling album of 2014 and 2002 through 2014 suddenly disappears from the number one music streaming platform in the world, along with her back catalogue of albums, it is bound to shake up the music industry. Spotify pays artists cents to the dollar for streaming revenue. Taylor Swift removed her entire catalogue to take a stance against the music giant to renegotiate the way it treats all musicians and how they earn streaming revenue.
Influential is not always synonymous with your particular taste in music. Know the facts.
Putin, Person of the Year?
Might as well nominate Kim Jong Un, too.
Roger Goodell? The Washington Redskins, and the Adrian Petersen and Ray Rice abuses obliterated any character and credibility he or the NFL ever had.
TIME shouldn't have even taken the time (pun intended) to consider him.
BL.
Being gay in a world where gays and lesbians are still persecuted or killed for who and what they are is sure as hell a big deal. And for someone who the head of one of the biggest companies in the world to come out as gay is a big deal. That gives others hope that it can and will get better.
BL.
Putin and Swift, is this a joke?
being gay is not a big deal.
What's with all the Putin Hatin? He's doing everything I would do if I was the leader of Russia and NATO was slowly surrounding my country. His behavior is very rational.
20, really? Obviously you only read about it when it's about a patient treated in a developed country.