This mentality is baffling. The vast majority of users aren't even using 64GB. It's 2018, internal storage is all but irrelevant.In this day and age 64GB should not be an option. This pricing model is nothing but self serving.
This mentality is baffling. The vast majority of users aren't even using 64GB. It's 2018, internal storage is all but irrelevant.In this day and age 64GB should not be an option. This pricing model is nothing but self serving.
And it also has bezels from 2013From a business perspective, the iPhone Xr seems amazing. It's $250 less than the Xs but seems to lack more than $250 worth of components (especially once you account for margins on each component). It doesn't have an OLED screen, ForceTouch, a secondary camera, the thinnest bezels, or stainless steel body, but it's still ostensibly a thing of beauty.
View attachment 781211
I think it has effectively pushed me into keeping my products well into 3-4 years or more range.Thankfully, just a mid cycle battery replacement and they actually do last that long so it's win-win.
Yep. And at the end of the day they will all get the new phones and still complain about it.Comments here will rage like a wild fire![]()
What by removing the low price option?
To be fair the two year old iPhone 7 is low priced at 449.
Yes the SE was a well liked device
It's really only missing an OLED screen, the dual cameras.
"...we can make a reasonable business out of it"
I know he's usually known for his understated mannerisms but this is one for the ages
Not that benchmarks necessarily mean much but the iPhone 7 beats the Samsung S9 in a number of benchmark metrics. The S9 has a few features that the iPhone 7 doesn't have but that's still impressive for "2 year old technology".By offering 2 year old technology at affordable prices.
That kind of logic is baffling. If the storage were irrelevant, there would be no 512GB option.This mentality is baffling. The vast majority of users aren't even using 64GB. It's 2018, internal storage is all but irrelevant.
Yep. And at the end of the day they will all get the new phones and still complain about it.
Again... The X wasn't an edge to edge screen.
At an event in Cupertino yesterday, Apple announced three new iPhone models: the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR. Prices for the iPhones start at $749 for the iPhone XR in 64GB, and increase to as much as $1,449 for the iPhone XS Max in 512GB, which represents Apple's most expensive iPhone to date.
![]()
Commenting on this price range in an interview with Nikkei today, Apple CEO Tim Cook said, "We want to serve everyone." Apple introduced the iPhone XR at a cheaper price point so that customers who wanted the advantages of the iPhone X line -- Face ID, an edge-to-edge screen -- could find them on a lower-cost iPhone.
Likewise, the iPhone XS Max represents Apple's biggest iPhone yet, and serves the customers who enjoyed the features of the 2017 iPhone X, but wished it came in a larger size.
Apple will also still sell the previous generation iPhone 7 and iPhone 8, at new lower prices. The iPhone 7 will now start at $449 in 32GB and increase to as much as $669 for the iPhone 7 Plus in 128GB. The iPhone 8 will start at $599 in 64GB and rise to $849 for the iPhone 8 Plus in 256GB.
Discussing the iPhone in general, Cook says that, "The role of the iPhone has become much larger in people's lives," and that will justify the price of the devices for many customers.
Those interested will be able to pre-order their iPhone XS or iPhone XS Max beginning tomorrow, September 14, and the smartphones will then launch on September 21 in over 30 countries and territories. The iPhone XR will go up for pre-order in about a month, on Friday, October 19, and then launch on October 26.
In addition to the iPhone, Apple yesterday also announced the Apple Watch Series 4 with a 30 percent larger display, thinner body, ECG reader, fall detection, and more. Similar to iPhone XS, Apple Watch Series 4 pre-orders will go up on September 14 and the smartwatch will launch on September 21.
Article Link: Tim Cook on iPhone Prices: 'We Want to Serve Everyone'
I have not bought a launch day iPhone since the 4S and instead bought last gen devices since then, and this time I was all set to buy the 512GB XS Max but at $1449, I'm starting to have second thoughts...
Maybe getting a used iPhone X 256GB will be in my future.
It’s not when you’re paying $999+ for a phone. Have you looked at SSD prices lately? 128gb SSD’s are routinely going for less than $30 these days. And that’s using much more expensive flash ram than the eMMC slower flash that Apple is using.This mentality is baffling. The vast majority of users aren't even using 64GB. It's 2018, internal storage is all but irrelevant.
It's really only missing an OLED screen, the dual cameras (let's be honest, a lot can be achieved with a single lens. Look at what Google has been able to do with the pixel 2) and 3d touch (which is just a fancy long press). They easily could've just done an OLED phone with a single camera.
Indeed it is, but still... he’s about to literally destroy millions of X units (the “most innovative phone ever”) just 1 year after launch in pursuit of profit. Gotta acknowledge that.Not that benchmarks necessarily mean much but the iPhone 7 beats the Samsung S9 in a number of benchmark metrics. The S9 has a few features that the iPhone 7 doesn't have but that's still impressive for "2 year old technology".
Discussing the iPhone in general, Cook says that, "The role of the iPhone has become much larger in people's lives," and that will justify the price of the devices for many customers.
Article Link: Tim Cook on iPhone Prices: 'We Want to Serve Everyone'