I didn't take it as being argumentative at all, in fact it's healthy to be able to have conversations with varying view points. What I would say to that is, if you're referring to "AI" as in what Apple has to offer (I'm just assuming because we're on an apple forum) than I would agree with you that it IS wildly inaccurate and there are much better options out there.
I get that assumption, but no. I’ve never really used Siri, aside from asking it silly questions on my iPhone 5 back in the day, to get silly answers, and my use of Apple Intelligence is mostly just the proofreader. I never felt comfortable talking to a computer, back in the late 90s I think, when voice dictation was being a thing, even though I was excited for it, and that extends to talking to my phone. Voice is an inferior interface.
I use Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude, and Mistral, and have tried Gemini a few times. Additionally I run Ministral and Gemma3 (12b) locally on my MacBook.
ChatGPT and Claude can be useful for troubleshooting tech issues if you already know enough to call BS when necessary. Otherwise, outside of tech, they’re good at providing generic boilerplate text when you don’t know the shape of the answer and just have an assortment of facts.
Gemini and Mistral (online and local for both) haven’t been terrible at helping me develop new DnD characters. They all get so much wrong you can’t just use their output, but there’s enough there that you can pull ideas from it.
Given all of this, I don’t see the attraction of trying to do everything through one.