Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Don't forget that Jobs was also responsible for John Sculley becoming CEO, so that's not necessarily a convincing argument.

Yes - and one of the things that arguably separates the smart people from the not so smart people, is the ability to recognise the lessons to be learned, and then apply those new lessons.

Screwing up once is a learning opportunity. Repeating the screw up is deserving of a good kick in the pants!
 
I wish this 'strong operational leader' thing wasn't focused on so much. The guy does have a degree in industrial engineering after all. So he seems to know a thing about products.

He just isn't Steve Jobs.
 
Last edited:
Yes - and one of the things that arguably separates the smart people from the not so smart people, is the ability to recognise the lessons to be learned, and then apply those new lessons.

Screwing up once is a learning opportunity. Repeating the screw up is deserving of a good kick in the pants!

Apple vs Microsoft.
Apple vs Google?
 
I wish this 'strong operational leader' thing wasn't focused on so much. The guy does have a degree in industrial design after all. So he seems to know a thing about products.

He just isn't Steve Jobs.

Tim has a degree in Industrial Engineering.
 
Steve Jobs had faith in Tim Cook, so I will too. However, the slip in release for something as big as iTunes Match has me worried. Jobs would've kicked some ass to get this done right and in time. Sometimes you can't motivate people with hugs.
 
Can't say this article adds anything new, it just states Tim Cook is doing COO task while also being CEO. Of course, immediately after Jobs death, he would relay on his top executives - who wouldn't?
 
I feel there's a lot of misguided media and "fan-base" attention on Mr. Cook and Apple's future. These people worked with Steve, closely and they did with his confidence. They were (and still are) the ones that imagined products, created products, improved products, marketed products and ran one of the most successful companies of our time. Yes, Steve was a visionary and guided everyone and everything, the results were not solely his. Apple is in the same capable and brilliant hands as it always has been (edit: well.. speaking of the current structure that is). There are those that have the exact same imagination and drive for simple perfection. They may not walk the same path as Steve, but their's will lead to the same result.

Don't judge a person solely on his keynote performance, especially when it is known after the fact that Tim and others knew Steve was in his final stage of dying. Anyone that close to Steve was affected by that. "Keynote Steve" is a tough act to follow and not a single person at Apple could fill those shoes alone, which is why they all do in their own ways.

Tim & crew are fine. Apple's future is bright. People need to relax and give these people some room to grieve, recover and move forward, and not play "Chicken Little" with every single move Tim & crew make.

imho :)
 
Steve Jobs had faith in Tim Cook, so I will too. However, the slip in release for something as big as iTunes Match has me worried. Jobs would've kicked some ass to get this done right and in time.


Like the White iPhone 4...
 
Anyone have a link to the full post behind the WSJ paywall?

Here's the full story.


Tim Cook promised that Apple Inc. wouldn't change when he took over the company's helm from Steve Jobs in August.

But the low-key Mr. Cook has already put his operational mark on Apple in ways that suggest the company won't be entirely the same as under its intense and tempestuous co-founder.


In recent weeks, Mr. Cook has tended to administrative matters that never interested Mr. Jobs, such as promotions and corporate reporting structures, according to people familiar with the matter. The new chief executive, 50 years old, has also been more communicative with employees than his predecessor, sending a variety of company-wide emails while addressing Apple employees as "Team," people close to the company said.

Mr. Cook has also displayed some different corporate philosophies from Mr. Jobs. The new CEO recently announced a charitable matching program promising Apple would match employee donations to non-profits of up to $10,000 a year, starting in the U.S. In contrast, Mr. Jobs said at a company off-site last year that he was opposed to giving money away, according to a person who attended.

Much about the technology giant hasn't changed and isn't expected to. Mr. Cook, an Apple veteran who became chief operating officer in 2005 and who ran the company during Mr. Jobs's multiple medical leaves, isn't a fan of reorganizations, said a person familiar with the matter. He is also a fierce believer in Apple's culture, which idolizes product development and design and preaches intense secrecy.

But the moves Mr. Cook has made since he officially took over the CEO title provide signs of how he will seek to run Apple in the years ahead, imposing more discipline on a place that for years was guided by Mr. Jobs's gut.

An Apple spokesman declined to comment and said Mr. Cook wasn't available for an interview.

A supply chain whiz fluent in sales charts and forecasts, Mr. Cook is a disciplined manager and a contrast to Mr. Jobs, who had little patience for management matters, according to friends and colleagues of both. Mr. Cook is accessible, and over the years served as a sounding board for executives who wanted advice on approaching Mr. Jobs, former Apple employees say.

Since becoming CEO in August, Mr. Cook has restructured Apple's big education division that deviated from the company's overall organizational structure, according to a person familiar with the matter. For years, that business had operated fairly independently. Mr. Cook split the business into a sales arm and a marketing arm and incorporated the groups into their respective company-wide divisions, said this person.

The move streamlined Apple's structure and increased the responsibilities of senior vice president of worldwide product marketing Phil Schiller and John Brandon, a vice president who oversees many of Apple's sales channels and has worked very closely with Mr. Cook for years, this person said. Apple's education head John Couch, who had reported to Mr. Cook, now reports to Mr. Schiller.

Within days of taking over, Mr. Cook also promoted vice president Eddy Cue to Apple's senior vice president of Internet software and services, bumping up the title of one of the company's most visible executives.
Former executives and people close to Apple say they also expect Mr. Cook to be more open with shareholders and customers than Mr. Jobs, citing Mr. Cook's willingness to meet fairly regularly with investors over the years.

"Steve thought he had all the answers," said Toni Sacconaghi, a research analyst who covers Apple for Sanford Bernstein & Co. "I am not sure Tim thinks he has all the answers." Mr. Sacconaghi also describes Mr. Cook as "surprisingly candid" about parts of the company, such as its iPhone expansion strategy.

One area people expect Mr. Cook to eventually focus on is what to do with Apple's $81.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents. Mr. Jobs was opposed to stock buybacks, according to former Apple executives.

But Mr. Cook seems open to more traditional options for Apple's cash hoard, such as dividends or a buyback, say people who have discussed the matter with Apple executives. On the company's fiscal fourth quarter earnings call last month, Mr. Cook said, "I'm not religious about holding cash or not holding it."
Any such moves would be up to all of Apple's directors, of which Mr. Cook is one, and wouldn't likely happen soon, according to one of these people.

One other difference with Mr. Jobs: Mr. Cook is "not a product guy," his colleagues and friends often say. That's a sentiment Mr. Jobs himself echoed to author Walter Isaacson in a recently published biography. People close to the company question whether Mr. Cook can continue the string of hits that have made Apple the world's largest technology company.

In the past, Mr. Cook once asked an employee briefing him on a new service, "tell me again how this helps me sell more phones," according to this person.
 
Message from Cook

.
Hey Team!!

We got a market lead and someone already planned out the next 4 years. Now it's time to relax and take some time off!

C'mon TEAM! Let's coast, y'all!! Heeee haw!!

Tim


:mad::apple::mad:
 
Keep in mind during the iPhone 4S launch all the Apple people there knew Steve was in a very bad way... just not that he was literaly on what would turn out to be his death bed. It's kinda hard to be up beat and "wowing" when something like is going on.

Sorry for being a bit morbid but I'll give Cook and crew a pass on being entertaining for that launch given the circumstances.

I actually believe, based on what I've read, that the Apple execs knew he was on his deathbed. Mona Simpson, in her eulogy, said she received a call Tuesday morning, and add to that the fact that she was in NY, it is very likely everyone was informed well before the keynote.
 
I've got a good feeling about Tim Cook. Wasn't wowwed by his presentation technique but sounds like he's got a good attitude on him.


You shouldn't base his "presentation technique" based on the iPhone 4S Launch. He as well as the other presenters had just heard of or spoke to Jobs that same day letting them know he was dying within 24 hrs. Based on Mona Simpson's NYT eulogy Jobs called her to get her to go see him as well as called Apple colleagues to speak to for the last time that Tuesday the same day of the launch.
 
If you read steve's biography you would understood that many of the great products made under his leadership were thought of, developed or modified by the excellent team that he surrounded himself with and the environment he created at the company. The great thing about having him around was that he would push and authorise things that many CEOs would just ignore. See something special that others do not see! Lead and push these teams! While I think Apple will continue to produce and create in the future 5-10 years, time would tell if Apple can have his spirit, risk taking and vision after that! I just can't see it!
 
Is strange. You pay to be demigod, but you also steal article from paywall and post on internet forum. Sad. :(


.

You know what they say about assuming, don't you?

I didn't take it from behind a paywall. A simple Google search gave me a link to the full article.
 
he's weak and soft, he's nothing like steve. people will start to take advantage of that...

Managers who are weak and soft don't beat the supply chain into line and get component prices and inventory under control like Apple has. Suppliers are more likely to get drowned by a tsunami than take advantage of Apple any other way (with the possible exception of Samsung's lawyers if they get very very lucky).

The bigger problem may be that if he is spending most of his cycles on operational excellence, who's keeping their eye on future product development?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.