Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Your point would be valid if all heads of the company were fired after this happend. SO WHOOPEE apple are still not the golden child they are made out to be for security and privacy. Yes, they are better than FB and Google but to be held up like saints....NOPE.
Apple should have paid the workers for having to wait in line. That has been rectified. However, Apple did not violate anyone's privacy. Said workers were made aware of the policy before they were hired.
 
Apple should have paid the workers for having to wait in line. That has been rectified. However, Apple did not violate anyone's privacy. Said workers were made aware of the policy before they were hired.
So why was there a big deal made about it if all the workers knew about it. That don't sound right to me.
 
The big deal was that the workers were mad that they were having to wait to be searched without being paid for their time.
Ok, not a big deal. I was under the understanding that there were shenanigans going on with the search itself. I worked a job where 30 people had to time in in a 3 min period or be marked late. You had to enter a reason for being late, you should have seen what I put in. HA HA. I never got fired so they didn't even read the reasons.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Unregistered 4U
Poor Timmy.
He does not look like a very happy bunny :(

81b7ccc256eb86132f35a207372029c8.png
 
So I’m guessing that means iOS 14.5 is coming next week? Seems like they want to run this story with the release.
 
I agree about Facebook but Apple won't ban it, but they banned Parler for being free speech site. For first time ever, I recommended to a friend he get an Android so he could sideload the parler app. I also wish Tim who wants to forget he's from Alabama to stop meddling in election laws designed to make elections transparent and fair. But we all know the woke corporations love stolen elections.
 
Facebook says that small businesses rely on tracking to provide personalized ads and that with ATT, those ads will be less effective.

Facebook ads have NEVER been effective at anything other than creating revenue for Facebook. I've been sucked into FB ads before, and tried a few times. Not once have I said to myself "I'm glad I paid for FB advertising - that ad was really effective and I now have more business because of it"
 
Sorry, I know Tim is entitled to his privacy, but he really does look like he just squeezed out a silent but deadly one.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: qoop
Tim Cook realises that (the illusion of) privacy is a commodity, which he is willing to sell to the public. Facebook encroaches on his sales pitch. (FWIW I don't have facebook because they are a terrible company, so I don't care either way)

Tim Cook was shocked, shocked I tell you, about privacy breaches...

https://9to5mac.com/2016/10/25/lisa-jackson-podesta-email/
"Jackson writes that Apple is constantly giving government “information about Apple customers and devices.” While it’s easy to jump to conclusions with that statement, the next sentence is important as Jackson explains that the information is given in response to warrants and other legal requests."

What’s interesting to note here is that Jackson’s tone in the email is far different than the tone Apple takes publicly. Generally, in public, Apple tends to play the “good guy” and downplay its response to government requests for information. Jackson, however, almost seems to boast of its “thousands” of responses to government aid and various ways encryption doesn’t help Apple users hide information.

Jackson has served on the board of directors of the Clinton Foundation since 2013.


Note: this is not political, but within the context of privacy to show that Apple can be duplicious by stating one thing about privacy publicly and doing another thing privately - and that they do so by being friendly with administrations.

Apple clearly wants to make an ad ecosystem - with the app store, Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple Fitness, Apple Health (hello Pharma tie-ins!) - at a certain point they will be in all the markets that have revenue potential. That will not be a good thing.
This is sold as "privacy", but it's a convenient sell for Apple.

Not sure if 'duplicitous' is the right word; Apple is publicly clear about what it does and doesn't do with respect to law enforcement and privacy; see their FAQ, written specifically for law enforcement officials:


And a pretty interesting 'Transparency Report':


As for Apple creating their own data-driven ecosystem, you're probably right, but assuming you're allowed to opt-in (or out) every step of the way, I'm not sure what the issue would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daley and Kengineer
You mean the people who clicked okay on allowing Apple to collect their data in an unlinked to them method to make improvements to Apple services?
The people agreed to it, but probably forgot they agreed to it - and from my experience most people don’t read the question in the set up phase of their tech products and just click “Accept/Next” then complain later about what ever the issue is.
You’re COMPLETELY wrong about that statement, it was a reactionary move on Apples part after being caught.
 
When people are suddenly so shocked about privacy when it was clearly laid out in the Terms and Service, I find hysterical. Then complain about it as if it were a crime against humanity.

It was laid out in the Terms and Conditions/Service. Not all of us (myself included) ever bothered to read them.

That being said, I like how Apple is giving us a choice that is more streamlined and easier to read.
 
When people are suddenly so shocked about privacy when it was clearly laid out in the Terms and Service, I find hysterical. Then complain about it as if it were a crime against humanity.

It was laid out in the Terms and Conditions/Service. Not all of us (myself included) ever bothered to read them.

Sadly, I think it's really about some people getting emotionally triggered by seeing a picture of Tim Cook. It really doesn't matter what the story or subject matter is. The success Apple has achieved over the years under his leadership will never be enough for some, and provokes jealousy and anger in others. Lashing out is a satisfying feel-good response.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.