Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You, as a consumer, can always tell when you're being screwed -- when some event causes prices to skyrocket but there is no real shortage. Gas prices -- anyone see a gas station with an "Out of Gas" sign? RAM and SSD -- has anyone seen Amazon constrained by "out of stock" on popular SSD and RAM upgrades? It's fake, and the manufacturers are laughing all the way to the bank.
It's kinda cute watching people accidentally almost discovering price elasticity from observation.

You don't see "out of stock" on SSD/RAM because their prices reacts to their marginal scarcity. You do see they cost a lot more, because there's less of it relative to their increased demand (duh).

This is a GOOD thing. It means if someone really wants it, it's still there to buy. The good is not allocated to those who dont want it as much. The price matches the willingness to pay for it.

Like, the chip goes to a research lab for computational simulation, instead of a teenager in his basement playing Crysis.

Imagine if there was actually NO GAS left to by. or NO CHIPS left. That's a worse alternative.

Here's a thought experiment even a 3rd grader can understand: did nobody at Micron think to be able to screw people by manufacturing a "fake shortage" any time within the last 40 years? Like, they waited until today to laugh to the bank?
1781790745656.png
 
It's kinda cute watching people accidentally almost discovering price elasticity from observation.

You don't see "out of stock" on SSD/RAM because their prices reacts to their marginal scarcity. You do see they cost a lot more, because there's less of it relative to their increased demand (duh).

This is a GOOD thing. It means if someone really wants it, it's still there to buy. The good is not allocated to those who dont want it as much. The price matches the willingness to pay for it.

Like, the chip goes to a research lab for computational simulation, instead of a teenager in his basement playing Crysis.

Imagine if there was actually NO GAS left to by. or NO CHIPS left. That's a worse alternative.

Here's a thought experiment even a 3rd grader can understand: did nobody at Micron think to be able to screw people by manufacturing a "fake shortage" any time within the last 40 years? Like, they waited until today to laugh to the bank?
View attachment 2639338

Econ 101
 
  • Like
Reactions: gnesterenko
As someone who is using the 16 pro max, I was hoping to wait for the 18 pro. But now I guess I will get either the 17 Pro Max or Air right now

17 Pro Max. while I'm sure the 18 Pro Max will be a leap over the 17, OS 27 is the saving grace from the heavens.

If you can buy one now, do it. When OS 27 launches in September it will be like you have a brand new 18 Pro Max.
 
Simple fix stop the 99% meaningless megapixel upgrades, forcing higher, iCloud usage and more phone storage usage.
 
Apple seems to be doing an extremely poor job of managing their supply chain. Apple should have the expertise and ability to produce their products from scratch. They don't need to necessarily do it, but they do need to be able to credibly threaten any and all suppliers that they will be replaced with vertical integration if they that supplier is unable to control their own costs.
 
Businesses are bailing on AI, coz it has no ROI. It's a money pit for business. And that's just people who *use* AI. The AI companies themselves also have zero ROI and are money pits. The whole thing is gonna crash and burn. The emperor has no clothes.
Wish it would happen yesterday. Only the extremely rich or those who work in the Ai industry are benefitting from the slop.
 


Apple is raising its prices to offset the high cost of memory and storage, CEO Tim Cook told The Wall Street Journal. Apple is no longer able to absorb the increased prices and will need to pass some of the cost on to consumers.

Apple-Logo-Cash-Feature-Blue.jpg

"Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable," said Cook. "We're doing our best to mitigate the huge increases that are being passed to us, and we've been trying to shield our customers from the increases, but the situation has become unsustainable."

Cook did not say which products will get price increases or how much pricing will go up. The iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max coming in September could be more expensive than the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. Prices on iPads and Macs could go up in the near future.

Apple already raised the price of the Mac mini from $599 to $799 by eliminating its lowest-tier model. Apple has also eliminated several higher-tier Mac mini and Mac Studio options.

Growing demand for memory and storage chips from AI companies has led to chip shortages and higher costs. The Wall Street Journal suggests Apple will need to increase device costs "substantially" to maintain its current profit margins given the cost of memory chips and SSDs. Research firm TechInsights claims Apple will need to make the iPhone 18 Pro around $270 more expensive to keep its existing profit margin.

Apple is struggling more with memory chips, but storage chips are also an issue. "There's less supply at a time when consumers want devices and the memory guys are passing along huge price increases," Cook told The Wall Street Journal. Cook said Apple will use its cash to increase memory supply, but he did not give details on what that means.

Apple does not plan to create its own memory and storage factories. "We can't do everything," Cook said. "We know what we're good at."

While memory chip makers like Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron are increasing production capacity, much of that added capacity will prioritize server chips. Demand for consumer-device chips is expected to continue to outpace supply. At the same time, Apple needs to increase the DRAM in its devices to support new AI features. Cook likened the memory shortages to a hundred-year flood. "I've never seen anything like it in any area in over 40 years," he said.

Apple is one of the largest purchasers of memory and storage worldwide, but it is likely reluctant to make the same deals AI companies do. Those deals involve signing multi-year agreements with a large cash prepayment.

Multiple companies have already raised their prices, including Samsung, Microsoft, Sony, and Dell.


Article Link: Tim Cook Says Apple Price Increases Are 'Unavoidable' Due to Memory Costs
I am an investor

This is music to my earrrrrsssss



Make me rich, children haahahahhha

PS: at least one fold in every household hazhahahha

Catchy innit
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: maflynn
This is totally predictable, and I get it, but "unavoidable" is obviously just not true. Prioritizing customers over shareholders would be one way to avoid it. Mind you, they've obviously been sucking up the cost for a while, so this probably means a permanent price increase, at this point. Maybe we'll see a reduction later, if chips come down and as new models are released, but hard to say.

What I find infinitely irritating about this is that it's all about the idiotic so-called "AI Arms Race". But does anybody actually need better models than we have already? I primarily use Claude Code and it is honestly totally fine. Between Opus and Sonnet I can do everything I need to do. Better tooling and memory? Sure. But dumping cash into bigger and "smarter" models is mostly a waste of resources at this point; i.e., incremental gains coming at huge costs. It's ridiculous. And AGI isn't happening with LLMs. (I'm also totally unclear as to why AGI is in any way necessary.)
 
Businesses are bailing on AI, coz it has no ROI. It's a money pit for business. And that's just people who *use* AI. The AI companies themselves also have zero ROI and are money pits. The whole thing is gonna crash and burn. The emperor has no clothes.
Business I work for which has +120 million customers worldwide, is implementing more and more ai tools so your reply is null and void in my eyes 🤣🤌🏻
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparkles3020
The chippocalypse has been reported on since at least January. I’m surprised prices haven’t risen more already.
 
This is totally predictable, and I get it, but "unavoidable" is obviously just not true. Prioritizing customers over shareholders would be one way to avoid it. Mind you, they've obviously been sucking up the cost for a while, so this probably means a permanent price increase, at this point. Maybe we'll see a reduction later, if chips come down and as new models are released, but hard to say.
.
.

Apple could be magnanimous and hold the price of their devices at the current 2026 levels for the next year until the end of the AI buildout. Apple could tell the world they are holding the price as a 'reward' to the loyal Apple customer base. It would be a marketing bonanza.

But they won't, and only because of greed. They expect to make the same profit, or more, each year. Apple is not there for the customer...they are there for the shareholder.

As for prices coming back down. Probably no more of a drop than half the increase. We will likely never see memory prices at 2025 levels again.
 
Businesses are bailing on AI, coz it has no ROI. It's a money pit for business. And that's just people who *use* AI. The AI companies themselves also have zero ROI and are money pits. The whole thing is gonna crash and burn. The emperor has no clothes.

This AI buildout reminds me of the U.S. Telecom crash around 2001. I was a part of that business at that time. Companies threw good money at prospects and hope. They built a bubble on a business plan that was not well thought out. Adding thousands of wired and wireless telecom companies, most of them 'paper carriers', was not going to make anyone money.

It is very likely that we will see many of the products produced for these AI centers being sold for pennies on the dollar and then stripped for their components.
 
Last edited:
Apple seems to be doing an extremely poor job of managing their supply chain. Apple should have the expertise and ability to produce their products from scratch. They don't need to necessarily do it, but they do need to be able to credibly threaten any and all suppliers that they will be replaced with vertical integration if they that supplier is unable to control their own costs.
Unless you expect Apple to build a RAM fab just for themselves, including somehow jumping the line at ASML for the lithography machines and speed running what would be expected to be a decade or more of build out and production tuning I’m not sure what you think they can do?

This isnt a supply chain failure, there’s a genuine shortage of available RAM for consumer devices, Apple’s actually better positioned to deal with it than most of their competitors, but they’re not immune
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatLouie
I wonder if this could actually be the impetus Apple needs to start its own foundry. Chip production is the only major thing they're not already doing in-house. Considering the weakness of TSMC being the Chinese government finally putting their foot down on Taiwan's self-government, plus having to compete with all of the other business TSMC receives from other companies, AI demand driving chip prices through the roof might just be the last straw. Wouldn't that be fun if they just went and bought Intel?
 
The company I'm with sell a lot of PC and server hardware, and the prices are eyewatering, and I had a feeling the new phones and other devices are going to suffer for all this. I was planning on getting an iPhone 18 this year too...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.