Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ke-iron
Infuse is a nice stand alone, But Plex is much more useful.



Hmm... have to say it's down to accents. Just tried that a few times and works great for me
Problem with Plex is I don't want to run a server on my computer...infuse is nice because i can just plug in a HDD to my airport extreme and then infuse finds it and brings them to my Apple TV 2 (jailbroken). Maybe there is another way of doing this i don't know about...
 
  • Like
Reactions: vito
Here is an excellent article on this matter:
http://www.imore.com/should-you-buy-32-gb-or-64-gb-new-apple-tv
Personally, I'm going with the 64 for only 50 measly bucks more and avoiding the possibility of lag in having to stream stuff instead of it being all local. MHO

Thanks for that.

When I first saw the storage options, I was annoyed that they went with 32 and 64.. Especially since the 32 is no longer offered on iPhone, instead 16 but that's a whole other story.

I will get the 64, but deep down, I still think they should have just given us 64 and 128 :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
With AirPlay you can either mirror the entire screen of the source device or specific things like just a video or picture without showing what's on the source screen. Also AirPlay uses no compression and can stream at the source resolution or target resolution Can those other devices do that as well?

I can say that the reason I use Miracast over Airplay is it is smoother and looks better in my case. I cannot speak to the technology behind it. I actually don't always mirror when using Miracast. You have an option to expand the display. I do this for videos as I can work on the laptop screen (surfing web, shopping, etc) and have the video playing on the TV through the Roku at the same time from the same laptop.
 
Oh yes I will do that but it still limits the actual streaming device - removes an option that has been there since ATV2 came out

Yeah, but people are still kvetchin that the TV2 removed regular old stereo RCA outputs and component video outputs, and an internal hard drive.

There is always some old connector or piece of old tech that can go.

If streaming 2 channel audio is what someone needs to connect to an old school amplifier with RCA only, or even to toslink, just get the device appropriate for the job, an airport express.

Yeah I know, its not a one size fits all solution but for 2 channel audio, why would you need an TV, much less one that does 4K video?
 
Yeah, but people are still kvetchin that the TV2 removed regular old stereo RCA outputs and component video outputs, and an internal hard drive.

There is always some old connector or piece of old tech that can go.

If streaming 2 channel audio is what someone needs to connect to an old school amplifier with RCA only, or even to toslink, just get the device appropriate for the job, an airport express.

Yeah I know, its not a one size fits all solution but for 2 channel audio, why would you need an TV, much less one that does 4K video?

TOS Link does a lot more than that. I have multiple TOS Link inputs on my older but high cost, high quality 6.1 AMP that decodes Multiple standards including Dolby and DTS standards.

Those of us that have been into high quality Audio before HDMI became common still need to have TOS LINK.

My 2015 4K UHD Samsung TV has TOS Link out , My Mac Mini has TOS Link out, My 2015 3D Blue Ray player has TOS Link out and i am not about to invest the kind of money I have invested in my existing equipment in a replacement unit just to get HDMI switching.

The answer is off course an easy one I have ordered a ROKU 4.
 
How can that be? tvOS is a brand new OS. There hasn't been 8 releases before this, it's the first one. Maybe with the beta's they are calling it that because it is in some part based off of iOS? I'm guessing that when the boxes come to us next week we'll see tvOS 1.0 on them.


Nice troll buried in here, hehe. I got a Fire TV of 4K, oh wait there is no 4K content!

Not sure what you're talking about. I've had more Apple stuff than 99% of people in this forum. Actually there is a fair amount of stuff on Netflix already and it's growing. Get your facts straight.
 
I think it will be a long time before 4K is offered through iTunes. A typical 4K movie will run about 100GB in size (vs. 4GB-8GB in size for 1080p).

Apple will need considerable upgrades to its own infrastructure to support mass streaming and downloading of 100GB files. And internet providers won't be happy about all that extra traffic on their networks. 4K may have to wait until the next generation of home internet, IMO.


Many are already doing 4K, Netflix, Vudu, M-go-Amazon......several rolling out 4K right now...
 
  • Like
Reactions: big-ted
I agree that apps on the Apple TV are a good thing. That said, and perhaps it's simply my lack of imagination, but what kind of apps do you see developers creating that people will want to use on the TV? Games are obvious, but the new Apple TV is a pretty weak console, so I don't think we'll see anything particularly compelling or "must have" in the game arena. Media players are obvious too. Plex, VLC, etc. But beyond that? What do you want do on your TV via apps? I'm curious.

Great question. Obviously, games is a big one and I do think the box is strong enough to serve up some good games. I do believe it's more powerful than many of the game systems from 5-7 years ago and they could do a lot. Obviously that won't appease the hardcore gamer, but plenty of power for games like Mario Party (as an example).

Anyway, in my head, the key will be Continuity. Making so the AppleTV can be my hub for everything electronic... music, video, games, phone calling, video calls, Web surfing, email, chatting, home kit, etc... Expand the box with accessories and functions that all me to seamlessly and instantly use the AppleTV for all of these things.

Obviously, many of these things are not possible with this version, but in my mind, this is where it needs to go. The devil is in the details too. It has to be easy and customers need to be able to customize the experience to streamline their interface to meet their needs... this is one area Apple needs to improve on IMHO. Take the current AppleTV interface, I would love to remove about 90% of the channel apps on the screen. Define what's on my own home screen etc... Obviously, something that's been weak with iOS... probably the weakest point in iOS.

So... there's my thoughts... obviously, if I could come up with a killer idea, I'd be making it. I do think in the long run, integration of entertainment and communications into the TV is the next area of advancement with consumers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
I think the lack of 1080p on the ATV2 when it was released was more surprising than 4k on the ATV4. 1080p TVs were more widely in use and more content was available for 1080p in 2010 then 4K TVs and content is today.

I read a business insider article about the fast adoption of 4k TVs, but even in their research they predicted that only 10% of US homes will have 4K TVs by the end of 2018.

I won't get one until my current TV dies. My PS4 doesn't do it. My digital media isn't in 4k. NONE of my Blu rays are in 4k. I don't have any player that can upconvert my stuff. I feel like if I get this ATV now, it'll die or need upgrading to run new apps before 4K is even in my house, let alone a widely accepted standard. The only thing I might do is for movies that come out on both formats is get the 4K ones so that I have them future proofed, since they'll last longer than the electronics will.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.