Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
When I hear stuff like this, I want to run screaming from Google. But yeah, I somehow can't believe that Apple is totally clean in this while everyone else is not. Still, I trust them farther than any others. Cook's got a point when he says to follow the money. As long as Apple is more interested in moving hardware then the collection of data is secondary at best. As long as the data they DO have in the system is well-protected, then I'd go with Apple.
 
An amount of data collection is inevitable with things such as Siri learning context of things, cloud services etc. but all the same I appreciate it is at least been acknowledged as a thing that people are quite rightly afraid of and they are also doing something about it to keep it to a minimum.

Quite the opposite of the maker of another well known mobile OS...

I'd rather they come right out and say it. Google collects data and I'm really perfectly fine with it. I'm not fine with apple saying, "We try." That's like teenagers saying they are trying to not get pregnant. We know how that goes.
 
When I hear stuff like this, I want to run screaming from Google. But yeah, I somehow can't believe that Apple is totally clean in this while everyone else is not. Still, I trust them farther than any others. Cook's got a point when he says to follow the money. As long as Apple is more interested in moving hardware then the collection of data is secondary at best. As long as the data they DO have in the system is well-protected, then I'd go with Apple.

so apple makes no use of user data for the betterment of their own products?

personally im not much more comfortable receiving an email from apple about what accessories i can buy for my newly purchased ipad than seeing imdb display on the bottom a list of actors/movies i was googling
 
I'd rather they come right out and say it. Google collects data and I'm really perfectly fine with it. I'm not fine with apple saying, "We try." That's like teenagers saying they are trying to not get pregnant. We know how that goes.

So what is Apple supposed to say? "We don't collect data"? That would be a lie, because it's impossible for a company to function without ever collecting data. Or should they say "We collect data"? That's also wrong, because they would put themselves on one level with Google - a company which builds its whole business model on collecting data.

When Apple states that they try not to collect data, it implies that they collect only the data that is necessary for them to conduct their business. They have the addresses of users to ship stuff to them. They have their credit card information to charge them for products and services. They know which apps or music they own to give Genius recommendations. When a company tries not to collect data, it means that they consider carefully whether a certain piece of data is necessary for conducting business or not. And this "consideration" is the part described as "trying".

I'm actually amazed at how many people here try so very hard not to understand that. Start your own company, run your own website offering services, and then you'll be surprised how much data from customers and users you will actually end up with that you have to very carefully and selectively get rid of in order not to end up collecting it.
 
Can you tell me who sell the keywords to advertisers?

So, the one that seem not being serous is you with all the wrong claims about selling you, you being the product,...

Google parses emails to better target ads towards you. This was the subject of Microsoft's ad campaign against google a while back. You can read about it in a lot of places:
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/09...il-privacy-lawsuit-says-it-has-right-to-scan/

For google it makes sense because ads are their primary source of revenue.
 
Only Apple could give away an album and have people moan about it.

I agree. People FIND things to complain about.

If Apple gives away free iPads for some promotion, I bet some people would complain - 'In 4 years, when I'm done with this device, Apple makes me pay a $5 recycling fee! Outrageous!'
 
While this is mostly true, Apple's primary problem is they don't allow users to come up with their OWN security questions. They have a stock selection of questions available for people to answer.

All you really have to do to break into an iCloud account is to write down these questions, find a target, and then find out the answers to all of the security questions.

Find the one that the target answered and you're golden.

Wait, you actually answer truthfully to those questions?
 
Whilst I still try to be quite circumspect with my privacy, I do believe Apple are a lot less interested than others when it comes to collecting data, or in tracking people without their consent… and they are quite distinct in that compared with many of their competitors in the tech world.

It is good to read Cook reiterating Apple's attitude on such things, though they can still do better, and I hope they will do. For all my misgivings about things like Touch ID they do seem to have done that about as right as they could have so far, and from what we can see so far of Apple Pay, that too.

Not that it means any Apple user concerned about their privacy should not remain vigilant and think critically about this stuff.

But I think there are probably a lot of us who like that Apple aren't like Google or Facebook or others whose business is essentially to offer services to users in return for getting to data mine for advertisers.

It's also possibly why iAds hasn't been a roaring success for Apple. It always seemed, to me, contrary to the kind of ideas Cook is mentioning here, and fundamentally at odds with their corporate identity.
 
Wait, you actually answer truthfully to those questions?

Some people are dumb - they probably write exact accurate answers, which can be revealed by a bit of 'googling' or 'Facebook gleaning'... How do you think those nudes got leaked - dumb celebrities...

Just because Apple asked standard security questions, does't mean you write the most obvious answers... Best trick to fool the standard security questions is to make your answers as obscure as possible, even better would be to answer it wrong... But make sure to store these answers in '1password' or 'the vault' or some such place..
 
And just because a MR m.... cannot accept Apple to be as bad as other companies, it means something?

They may be "as bad" in a general sense; we all know making money is "bad" of course.... (sic) But, not on this "data collection" point... Why? Because they don't need too. That's not how they make money. They're not altruistic about not collecting data, it is just not part of their value proposition to their customers.

So, what is your point exactly?
 
so apple makes no use of user data for the betterment of their own products?

personally im not much more comfortable receiving an email from apple about what accessories i can buy for my newly purchased ipad than seeing imdb display on the bottom a list of actors/movies i was googling

I don't pretend to know how this works at base level, but I imagine that the difference is Apple will market to you based upon data collected within its own ecosystem (the fabled walled garden), whereas Google will sell you out for its own profit.

But I could be wrong.
 
Two basic repeating posts here.

1. Apple must be up to something (because I would be if I were in apple's position)
2. I believe apple is doing it's best to avoid accessing anything it doesn't really need for us to use its services.

It's like a psychological test.
 
Our business is based on selling [products]. Our business is not based on having information about you. You are not our product.

I just want to emphasize this statements.
 
This guy cant be this dimm? right? can he, doubt it... hope!

If Gov is not requesting info its because it already has it!!!!! :rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.