Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Good Luck Mr. Cook. Please keep Apple true to it's DNA.

Most importent keep MBAs & Lawyers out of management, they just don't get it.
 
It simply doesn't matter to you. That is far from meaning "it does not matter". Not everyone is wise enough to understand the difference.

If he was straight, what would it change ? Would his "Apple is Not Going to Change" message be different ? No ? Then it is truly irrelevant and off-topic.

Not trying to be negative, but it would be my guess we won't see Jobs on the stage anymore at this point for a couple of reasons. First off I wish him the best and hope he can overcome the cancer, however most believe that he is not getting better and his health is getting worse.

Seriously, it's beginning to look like Steve is going to pull a Jack Layton us. Let's hope he has more than a few weeks/months left, but it's not looking good.
 
He says it wont change, but its inevitable, major decisions will come his way, and he's no doubt disagreed with Steve in the past.

Is he honestly going to think

"I feel really strongly that Apple should do this, but I know Steve would prefer something different, I'll go with what Steve would want"

He's going to go with his instinct, it will be probably slow, but Apple will slowly change, Im not saying for the worse, or for the better. But it will most likely change.

Im going to get very annoyed when new products launch, and the inevitable tide of "Steve would never have allowed that!" or "This wouldnt have happened under Steve!"
 
He says it wont change, but its inevitable, major decisions will come his way, and he's no doubt disagreed with Steve in the past.

Think big picture. Apple's culture of making innovative products with simple designs is not going to change is what he meant, not that the actual way of making these products, bringing them to market or selling them is not going to change.
 
He says it wont change, but its inevitable, major decisions will come his way, and he's no doubt disagreed with Steve in the past.

Is he honestly going to think

"I feel really strongly that Apple should do this, but I know Steve would prefer something different, I'll go with what Steve would want"

He's going to go with his instinct, it will be probably slow, but Apple will slowly change, Im not saying for the worse, or for the better. But it will most likely change.

Im going to get very annoyed when new products launch, and the inevitable tide of "Steve would never have allowed that!" or "This wouldnt have happened under Steve!"

Of course there will be changes and I honestly think that Cook will be an easier man to work for then Jobs was, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Jobs was a visionary in his leadership role, but he was also a boss that instilled a lot of fear in his subordinates. I don't see Cook being like that, but I do see him as a team builder and someone that his subordinates won't want to let down.

A lot of us have probably worked for two different types of people in our lives, at least I have. The ones that we were afraid of and did everything just right so we wouldn't lose our jobs or get berated by them or the ones we liked and admired and didn't want to be the person that let them down. I see Jobs as more of the first boss and Cook as more of the second.
 
Is this a bad sign...

"Tim Cook Apple CEO" is an anagram of "I'm a cock to people."

Now, I'm not suggesting for a second that just because your name and job title just happens to be an anagram with negative connotations that is means anything but, well, I guess that is what I'm suggesting actually.

You heard it here first.
 
*sigh*, leave it to gay people to make a big deal out of Tim's sexual orientation. Notice how it's the gay forum members that are finding this relevent, the rest of us don't know and frankly don't care about Tim's sexual orientation.

It does not matter.

Its because it doesnt matter that it matters.

(No, i am not gay).
 
Ego doesn't take pauses. It's rapid-fire. And it's that confidence and lack of ego that allows him the time to examine the issues and questions at hand, no matter how lowly or silly others may think them, and address them appropriately.
Reminds me of Jobs when he was taking questions after the WWDC '97 Keynote.
 
This is such an ignorant remark. So you think racist kids during his childhood or "skinheads" treated him as a "white" kid because of his geneology. He posseses the physical traits of a "black" man, and as such was discriminated against as a "black" man. As if the bigots in our society treated him as a white man due to the race of one of his parents. Your "half black" comment would suggest society would give consideration to what is on the inside figuratively or (literally in this case). But we all know, unfortunately, that people are judged all too frequently by what's on the outside. On the outside, regardless of his geneology, bigots see Obama simply as a "black" man, or not as a "white" man.

Haha yea becuase you know everything about him don't you? It isn't an "ignorant" comment. It is only stating a fact. Thanks for trying though missy. ;)
 
Not trying to be negative, but it would be my guess we won't see Jobs on the stage anymore at this point for a couple of reasons. First off I wish him the best and hope he can overcome the cancer, however most believe that he is not getting better and his health is getting worse. I mean there is a certain point where people in declining health either don't want to or can't put themselves in front of a crowd. Second, if he appears it almost overshadows the new Apple leadership and shows a lack of confidence whether real or perceived. Apple must go forward showing 100% confidence in their new leadership. Going forward you will see Tim Cook and Phil Schiller being the ones on the stage making introductions and talking about the company.

I wish Steve well in his retirement and as Chairman he will still have a say, however Cook and his team are now running the company.

This, and THIS.
 
Though he is Gay, I don't see how that is relevant. He is now "One of the most powerful man in Silicon Valley," the gay part doesn't have to be included.

It does matter if your gay and are looking for a positive role model. With so many negative stereo types it is refreshing to see a positive one. He is an inspiration to everyone especially if your young and gay and made to feel shameful about yourself. Best of luck Tim!!
 
If he was straight, what would it change ? Would his "Apple is Not Going to Change" message be different ? No ? Then it is truly irrelevant and off-topic.

To you.

The topic is about the new CEO Tim Cook. For some members, they find this an interesting part of the person that is Tim Cook. Talking about Tim Cook is certainly within the context of this thread as he takes the Apple helm. Talking about speculation of of the parts supplier for the next iPhone camera would be "off topic". We can let the moderators decide and move the posts if they find it "off topic".
 
I disagree. In my opinion, this is the progression of understanding and maturity:

First, there is hate, discrimination, bias, etc.

Second, there is "color blindness" or "political correctness". Don't say he's gay! Why mention it! I'd better down rank anyone that mentions he's gay! Oh god, don't call that guy a "Mexican" or "Chinese"! We're all the same.

Lastly, there is ACKNOWLEDGMENT and appreciation of our differences, understanding of where we came from, but without letting it lead to hate. This is the most nuanced and difficult place to arrive at.

YES, black people and Asian people and white people are all different. EQUAL,, but different. It'd be ridiculous to sweep our differences under the carpet and say that a Japanese person is the same as a Frenchman. Let's see our differences, appreciate them, and move on with our business.

The fact is, homosexuals are persecuted the world over, and are still discriminated against today. OF COURSE it's worth mentioning that Tim Cook, a homosexual, is now the CEO of the world's most valuable tech company. It would be unthinkable 20 years ago. The fact that he's homosexual is not relevant to his job performance, capability, etc. But it's worth mentioning as a marker of the progress we've made as a society.

I hear what you are saying, but correct me if I am wrong, Tim Cook has never came out and said that he was gay. Everything written about him being gay has been from so called "sources" and he has never came out and made a personal declaration. I don't know if he is or isn't and quite frankly it's none of my business. It appears to me that Cook has never made it an issue in his own professional life so why is everyone else making it an issue? I think we would be a whole lot better off if people worried about their own lives instead of worrying about who or what other people are doing in their personal lives.
 
In a sense you are right, it is pretty much business-as-some-months-ago. What has changed, however, is that Jobs is not coming back. This, i and others, read as Jobs (sad as it may be) doesnt have that much longer to live. Will he play a part for as long as he can? Im sure he will, as long as he wants to. Will that be for long? I seriously doubt it. (Lets hope that i am wrong).

This is why stock dropped, despite "no news". No Jobs, no Jobs visionry. Plain and simple.

Thanks for the reply.
But you need to remember:
Jobs the CEO is gone.
But Jobs the visionary is still there. And will be on hand to put his touch on things that need it. Be it as his pace now and not at the hectic CEO's schedule.

The stock dropped heals cause people over react. That's why APPL is a volatile stock. Simple. Jobs has really not filled a CEO role for ages. Cook did it all. About time Cook got the title for the work he did.
 
Whoa now. Lets take things one step at a time here.

That made this Canadian chuckle...

----------

"Tim Cook Apple CEO" is an anagram of "I'm a cock to people."

Now, I'm not suggesting for a second that just because your name and job title just happens to be an anagram with negative connotations that is means anything but, well, I guess that is what I'm suggesting actually.

You heard it here first.

What do roosters have anything to do with that?
 
Haha yea becuase you know everything about him don't you? It isn't an "ignorant" comment. It is only stating a fact. Thanks for trying though missy. ;)

Not everything about him. Only his "Obama is only half-black" remark, as a response to a post about Obama's election being a historic step for African Americans. To say it was not significant because Obama is only half-black is an ignorant remark.

I simply stated that remark was ignorant. My criticism of that remark said nothing about the poster, his intellect or any of his other opinions or posts. Stick to the facts- thanks for your failed try "missy".
 
Thanks for the reply.
But you need to remember:
Jobs the CEO is gone.
But Jobs the visionary is still there. And will be on hand to put his touch on things that need it. Be it as his pace now and not at the hectic CEO's schedule.

The stock dropped heals cause people over react. That's why APPL is a volatile stock. Simple. Jobs has really not filled a CEO role for ages. Cook did it all. About time Cook got the title for the work he did.

Question is, for how long? Of course, we can only speculate, but i wouldnt be surprised if we read about his demise in the months to come. Then again, he couldve had a miraculous recovery and faced with the experience of almost dying decided that he had better things to do with his time than be the CEO of Apple - stranger things have happened.
 
not everything about him. Only his "obama is only half-black" remark, as a response to a post about obama's election being a historic step for african americans. To say it was not significant because obama is only half-black is an ignorant remark.

I simply stated that remark was ignorant. My criticism of that remark said nothing about the poster, his intellect or any of his other opinions or posts. Stick to the facts- thanks for your failed try "missy".

k
 
The topic is about the new CEO Tim Cook.

Silly me, I thought the thread was called Tim Cook to Apple Employees: "Apple is Not Going to Change" and was about a message Tim Cook was sending Apple employees about the future of the company.

My mistake, I should have realised all along that this is about the man's sexual orientation. :rolleyes:

It matters to people because they want it to matter. It is quite irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. If he was straight or liked getting together with goats on the weekend, it would not change anything to his message to Apple employees.
 
Not really. He will still show up, just not signing the checks. The fact that he's still going to be CoB, and still on the Disney board says he's not on his deathbed.

He's not likely going to die tomorrow, but depending on how far it has progressed, things can happen very quickly.

That he's going to be the CoB and that he's still on the Disney board only tells me that they don't want all changes happing at once.

I have yet to see anything showing that he's currently an active participant at Apple or at Disney.
 
If what he is into becomes an issue then Apple is in trouble. Remember what happened at HP? CEO's are expected to keep their private life private and separate from their work life. They are held to a higher standard than the average employee.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.