She's so fake on this picture, looks like an evil robot.
This is called starting with an open mind. Something this candidate is much better at than her opponent. It would've been another historic first if it had materialized - the first gay candidate on a major ticket. It was obviously unlikely, however, for a number of reasons.
Apple might be 100% capitalist, but I don't think he has been ruthless.I think I'd rather have a ruthless businessman be ruthless in fixing Washington issues and dealing with international deals and global problems
Apple might be 100% capitalist, but I don't think he has been ruthless.
Since this is a political thread I will disagree with you vehemently. When my neighbors decide that we need to have a public school, and take money from me so I cannot afford to send my own kids to a different school, then I need to go and argue with the school board about why the biology textbook should teach evolution. Now I am having a political argument with my neighbors. However, if instead they structured things so that I could choose which school to go to my neighbors could teach whatever they wanted about evolution and I could send my kids to a school about evolution. The long and short of it is - in more free societies less and less things become political. In less free societies become political. In China everything - even down to the number of kids you have - is political. In the US - increasingly everything down to how I formalized consent for sexual relations - is political. But in free countries less and less becomes political and people can mind their own business without getting into fights with neighbors about the contents of biology textbooks. So in my mind, very little should involve politics.Sorry buddy. Literally EVERYTHING involves politics in one way or another.
It is not true that companies need to be ruthless. That is a capitalist myth.All companies have to be ruthless to survive and grow. Like Hillary, Apple has both a public and personal persona.
This election season needs to end.
... There is no evidence. Of course not. Clintons destroy evidence or have people killed! Wake the hell up.
You are really that much in a hurry to get rid of Hillary or Trump?
It is not true that companies need to be ruthless. That is a capitalist myth.
You have companies adopting different degrees of ethical/unethical behavior. A company might have to defend itself, but does not need to choose to use unethical means.If you say so it must be true. Samsung might disagree.
Take any business course and you will see that companies are at war with their competitors.
How about Tim Cook concentrate on getting the headphone jack back and making new Macs?
Politics was meant to be by the people. Not a class of know it alls who know nothing but career government. Both candidates are poop though... we should have done better.Meh I still think RELIGION, ECONOMY and POLITICS should be strictly separated and not influence one another. I'm sick of celebrities, industrialists and big CEOs siding with one or the other political figure. It's called manipulation.
That would be good, govt is too fat and big.Well, that would have made government thinner.