It does have email. It's just that you need to host your own server. Bathroom would be a good place for it.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tim Cook Was Named to Hillary Clinton's List of Vice Presidential Candidates
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yeah....okay. If he was in the debate, I would see all the bs through him.
''Oh yeah....it takes courage. I mean....I sold more than 8 million iPhones so that means I know how business works. It's amazing....I mean ...it's gonna be incredible if you pick me and Clinton."
Cnn: but you decided to remove 3.5 jack....
Tim: "oh that....I just wanted to make more more money...I mean...I know how business work."
Cnn: and Mac Pro?
''What's Mac Pro? Oh! You mean mbp....yeah.....uh"
Donald trump: "you rigged the hardwares!"
[doublepost=1476804564][/doublepost]
''Oh yeah....it takes courage. I mean....I sold more than 8 million iPhones so that means I know how business works. It's amazing....I mean ...it's gonna be incredible if you pick me and Clinton."
Cnn: but you decided to remove 3.5 jack....
Tim: "oh that....I just wanted to make more more money...I mean...I know how business work."
Cnn: and Mac Pro?
''What's Mac Pro? Oh! You mean mbp....yeah.....uh"
Donald trump: "you rigged the hardwares!"
[doublepost=1476804564][/doublepost]
Because he's afraid someone might question him about rigged hardwares...
Headphone jack is gone. It'd probably do you well to start coming to grips with that...
I'm not worried at all. But I am pleased when the best person for the job happens to be the first black, first woman, first gay, showing that those unimportant (as you have said) aspects are no longer artificial barriers.
It's worth noting, and celebrating, the shattering of a glass ceiling.
What a strange comment.
You really expect to control every aspect of the Apple's CEO life. So he has interest outside of Apple, what's the big deal?
Apple's reputation might have been tarnished....I think...being viewed as corrupted company from the conservatives.
Only thing he is pushing is an empty pipeline.
Or...Republicians will continue to block the Democratic Presidents.
This obstructionist congress and senate approach was only started when Obama became President.
That crooked criminal can name a thousand executives but they'll have to continue to work to support leeches like them (politicians).
Maybe Trump is popular as a candidate not because he's a successful businessmen, but because he's not a career politician.
With Hillary, be sure to get your taxes raised.
Trump said he's lowering taxes but he constantly mentions "pretending industries" (tariffs). Might be good for some workers but screw for everyone who wants to buy something cheaper.
The only decent choice is Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones who has experience decreasing taxes. Unfortunately, they have no chance.
About that democrat socialist who got robbed by Hillary; all the free stuff he offered is being paid by someone else. Guess one who gets the bill. Even if you're a student, eventually you're going to get a job and you'll be upset about letting politicians choosing what you should do with YOUR money.
Maybe Trump is popular as a candidate not because he's a successful businessmen, but because he's not a career politician.
With Hillary, be sure to get your taxes raised.
Trump said he's lowering taxes but he constantly mentions "pretending industries" (tariffs). Might be good for some workers but screw for everyone who wants to buy something cheaper.
The only decent choice is Johnson/Weld. They're the only ones who has experience decreasing taxes. Unfortunately, they have no chance.
About that democrat socialist who got robbed by Hillary; all the free stuff he offered is being paid by someone else. Guess one who gets the bill. Even if you're a student, eventually you're going to get a job and you'll be upset about letting politicians choosing what you should do with YOUR money.
As CEO, his job is to appease the people who own those pieces of paper of variable value (stocks). If removing the jack means more money to them than you not having to buy wireless bluetooth sealed battery landfill fodder every year (doesn't board member Gore object to some of these daffy decisions knowing how much more it will hurt the environment long-term, or how cheaply they're made??)... or if lowering worker costs mean more to the stock owners since many of them are retired and don't give a **** if their children or grandchildren have to compete against serf wages and all, then that is what Apple is going to do.
Nor do articles like this one make Cook look any better: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-paul/tim-cooks-views-on-americ_b_8854910.html
Hillary choosing Cook would have lost the election thanks to articles like that one.
I agree with half of that statement but I don't feel that Obama is as bad of a president as people think.
And perceived as not being bought and paid for.
And the other guy's name is "Bernie Sanders". He also explained many times how it was paid for. He's closer to the GOP's Eisenhower, but it's easier to call everyone "socialist" than to be bothered to think about details and ramifications. After all, YOUR money becomes less every time "YOUR" company dictates it because it wants more for the CEO or a token display of pony show for the stock owners about to see their value drop once those with the most stock cash in on theirs (selloff reduces value)
steve jobs would've never picked tim cook to be hillary's vp running mate.
She's been a senator and Secretary of State. She's about as qualified as anyone who's ever been President.
She's nefarious and deadly too. A slightly more sick and twisted version of Hussein.
[doublepost=1476805732][/doublepost]
I understand you love Timmy, it's ok.
I think he's been genuine for the most part. If not flawed or completely understanding at certain times. He's done a lot to improve, nobody can discount that, but the next few years will be crucial. Let's say Clinton wins - if she trips up then he will probably be blamed no less since he has also campaigned and openly advocated for her. Let's say Trump wins and the working/middle class situation improves off the bat. Obama's legacy will likely disintegrate. Not to mention if Clinton wins and the working/middle class situation improves instantly, or if Trump wins and all goes wrong. Or either candidate with a situation somewhere in the middle as opposed to be insta-good or insta-bad.
[doublepost=1476805821][/doublepost]
Saddam has been dead for years, why do people keep mentioning him?
A Globalist picking another Globalist to sell out America. **Shocking**
I think I'd rather have a ruthless businessman be ruthless in fixing Washington issues and dealing with international deals and global problems over someone who has repeatedly failed us, is only interested in herself and is so dishonest.
As to what other SOS had done, that argument is so unbelievably invalid. Yes US govt tech was out of date but has improved since then. But more, her purpose wasn't to be more secure than outdated tech, it was to circumvent the system to keep from getting caught for all her foundation / SOS illegal shady workings. It wasn't a mistake or poor judgment. It was by design to avoid prosecution. Same with when her billing records disappeared from the firm she worked at that would have implicated her and Bill in Whitewater. She said it at the last debate. There is no evidence. Of course not. Clintons destroy evidence or have people killed! Wake the hell up.
Do I love Trump. No. But she makes my stomach turn she is so insidious.
A lot of times, the president is blamed for situations that arise while in power that he or she could not have had any control over. Other times, as Obama has seen, people expect a magic pill that will fix everything in 2 months. Its really a thankless job...
It might have got worst recently but it been there for 25 years. And yes that includes when the roles were reversed.
Was that sarcasm ?
A good move by the Hillary campaign. Even though there was no way he would be picked, it gets Tim's sizable support and the LGBT community support.
I would rather argue he is a good CEO for short term Apple shareholders.. Not for Apple long term..Yeah no, Cook as a VP of the US? He's got no idea of politics. He's great as CEO of Apple and knows how to handle issues that are also politically charged, but being a VP wouldn't work on him. In fact, Clinton is not gonna work as President, that I can tell you.