Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
With Apple's pile of cash, buying a movie studio with their back catalog would be a far better investment than pursuing sports streaming.

LOL. Netflix's CFO & stockholders would like a word.

What library would you like them to buy that isn't already existing on another platform? I'd also like to know how you figure straight ad revenue for a captive/must tune-in audience is less than the revenue for buying said library less the system to implement & maintain the library & payout out royalties on all the movies.
 
Hmm. I hadn't known that.

But he's a VERY good actor.

Its not like Nicholas Cage was in the beginning of his career whom blew chunks and took over 20yrs to be good at at least 1 movie (Nephew of Francis Ford Coppola). Also, Michael Douglas is a great actor with his late father being a movie producer had skills. Some can jump on screen and do a great job, were others DO need to audition.

I mean I don't see Beyonce having great acting skills yet, unless her marriage to Jay-Z was always an act, lol. /s
We've already seen what happens when a singer (pop) jumps into a movie and how TERRIBLE their acting is, Madonna, and never gets any better. Well, there is also Jennifer Lopez ... took her I think 3 movies in where one she was well suited for - The Cell.

Rappers tend to do a LOT better in acting than Pop singers, cause their entire personality is a act or at least outside of their hood, the recording studio or their home city. Well just about everyone after LL Cool J. : 2Pac (I sincerely doubt he was acting in any role he did), Mos Def (Yasiin Bey) Hitchhiker's Guide to The Galaxy), etc.

I'm curious what Zendaya started having just a single name so young?
Lady Gaga was amazing in A Star Is Born… 👍🏻
 
What's bad about it? Ted Lasso is great, Schmigadoon! is fun, Ghostwriter is a fun family show, Central Park is quite good, The Snoopy Show is excellent, Luck was good, Best Foot Forward is great, Prehistoric Planet is amazing, Severance is quite good, Finch was surprisingly good, CODA was good, Come From Away is also good, Home Before Dark is enjoyable, Wolfwalkers is great, Boys State is great, Greyhound was fine, The Elephant Queen was great.

I'm sure I missed some but Apple TV+'s quality to quantity is extremely high. There are some misses on there (Amazing Stories wasn't amazing, Tiny World was quite bad [great visuals but bad writing and sound design], Foundation was a major miss, etc.) but if you want bad just bounce around Netflix or Prime Video or any other streaming service.

I wouldn't pay for Apple TV+ if it wasn't included in Apple One but I would sign up from time to time to get through shows and movies it has. The only services I pay for are Disney+ (worth it IMO) and HBO Max but that's not really worth it to me so I'll let my plan lapse once my year is up. Prime Video I only do because of my Prime subscription. Netflix is something I sign up for maybe every other year to watch a couple things. Too much little quality to quantity to make it worth it for me.
Netflix is by far the best streaming service and will remain so. They have the greatest content creation which equates to the most content each individual likes.

The thing about entertainment is that quantity is the correct methodology. See quality is something every streaming service has, but that quality only hits very very seldom. So what you do with entertainment is make as many different thing as you can and you’ll please the most people and you’ll land on those quality items more often.

Apple TV+ is garbage. They think it’s quality but it’s actually 90% garbage and low-quality with this facade of ‘art’. They strictly make boring garbage going for awards. You won’t be seeing the greatest entertainment getting the most awards: see Marvel movies; very few awards.

All humans like about 1% of the totality of entertainment ever produced. They hate 99% of it. Now, each individual likes a different variety though, which is why you make as much breadth of content as possible, so you hit that 1% for as many people as possible.

Disney+ = superheroes, and Star Wars which are both super super boring at this point. The variety is non-existent.

HBO = a couple decent shows, that’s it. And they just got rid of tons and tons of content when they merged with discovery.

Amazon = a couple good shows but that’s it

Hulu = a couple decent shows, that’s it


Collectively out of all streaming services each human will like about 1% of all content (truly like it). The rest is mehhh it was okay or it isn’t watched by them because they have no interest.
 
Oh look, yet another person who thinks they know better than Apple what Apple should do with Apple’s money, yet mysteriously does not actually run Apple (nor any other successful business, I suspect). Remember when everyone said they should buy Disney? And then Netflix? And then Activision? Give it a rest.
Instead Apple bought Beats HAHAHAHAH.

I remember Tim on Late Night trying to explain Peek and Pop. It was a man barely knowing how to explain 2 of their most embarrassingly stupid features they’ve ever built.

Randoms would be a lot better at Apple in a lot of cases.
 
Last edited:
Instead Apple bought Beats HAHAHAHAH.

I remember Tim on Late Night trying to explain Peek and Pop. It was a man barely knowing how to explain 2 of their most embarrassingly stupid features they’ve ever built.

Randoms would be a lot better at Apple in a lot of cases.
Luckily Tim is a supply chain guy. When you figure out what each person is capable of, you can leverage them better. Tim doesn’t need to waste his time with every nuance feature. You’re clearly longing for Steve Jobs whom could respond
 
These ads aren't working for me. I think actually these ads highlight what's wrong with Apple TV. They think they can just throw money and, get big names, and win. That's literally the Microsoft strategy of the Ballmer days and if failed incredibly. Sure there's a few good shows on Apple TV (I liked Severance, Tehran, Foundation) but I can count them with one hand. Compare this to the vast library of content on Netflix, HBO, Amazon, Disney.... Instead of paying all of these actors, they should buy better quality content, or sports. I mean if they bought the digital rights to the Super Bowl then we're taking.

Apple doesn't need to do what those other services are doing. Apple has other revenue streams. The other services literally throw money at everything, Netflix spent 17 Billion last year, Apple spent 6 Billion.

For Apple it's quality over quantity. Pick the right shows and movies, let them flourish and eventually you'll have a back catalogue that people will feel obligated to subscribe for because everything's a winner. One hit show like The Office that more than a million people literally fell asleep watching every night on Netflix when they had it is all it takes.

So far they're winning Emmy's and Oscars and show writers and movie producers want to be funded by Apple because they let them do their thing and don't meddle.
 
wow i wonder if that's hearsay or really true. In all fairness even if it is true, the studio and director will know they have a guaranteed audience and box office draw with him in it, and he is a very very good actor, so yes, if they can secure him as a name in their movie I'm sure he probably wouldn't and maybe shouldn't be expected to audition.

At the risk of stating the obvious, this is the case for most big name actors. If a studio/director/producer want someone in their movie then they won’t need to ‘audition’ for them. The idea that Timothy and Calamet and Leonardo DiCaprio are the 2 ‘exceptions’ to this… lol
 
I still need to push my script on a Docu_Com I wrote about the daily life of a Tech CEO.
don't think  will be bidders!
 
Uhm, exactly how many billions do their services make each year?
I’m sorry to tell you this but it doesn’t matter how much they make. They’re garbage.

The reason they make so much is because Apple designed the ‘walled garden’ buddy. People get Apple Music just because they have an iPhone and it’s what they know. They get iCloud upgrades because Apple literally bombards users with notifications in the Settings app to upgrade iCloud storage which they give you only 5GB of.

Apple fitness is laughably bad

Apple Music is the worst streaming music because their playlists are garbage; pandora has far far far better playlists

Apple TV+ has only a couple watchable shows

Apple Arcade is what you get when you put people who know absolutely nothing about video games in charge of video game efforts. Apple Arcade is like paying for fan art; that’s how bad those games are. You can also get identical games for free on the App Store and all of those are just meant to distract someone for a minute while they’re on a train or a flight…they’re worthless.
 
What part of my post says Beyonce and Viola should not audition? Also, Beyonce was acting when this guy was still a fetus. There are many artist who are good at both craft. So, not because you are a singer means you don't have any acting talent:

Barbara Streisand
Judy Garland
Bing Crosby
Janet Jackson
Jennifer Lopez
Jennifer Hudson
Jamie Foxx
Sorry, that’s what I took from what you said. I also had no idea that either Jennifer Hudson or Jamie Foxx were singers! Truly. As to Jennifer Lopez…well, she can act, though most of the movies I’ve seen her in have been pretty limited in terms of skill requirements. Doesn’t mean they weren’t money-makers! Still, I would think that she’s required to audition for any really big serious role (has she done that kind?), vs just a rom-com type movie. I’ve never seen Janet Jackson in any film. And I was a fan of hers years ago, so I’d think I’d have noticed! Streisand and Garland are unique talents — comedic, drama, anything, as well as out of this world singing and stage presence. Still, I would think that Streisand had to audition for many parts (maybe not all of them!). Garland and Crosby were around when Studios still managed actors’ careers, so perhaps they had fewer required auditions with a major studio backing them.

As to Chalamet, honestly, I’ve only seen him in Dune, which I thought was pretty decent, but that’s not a ‘heavy’ role like some of the others he has done. So, I can’t make an in depth judgment on his talent, though I think he is talented. Just very highly publicized—which is the success of his agents and press people and the camera.
 
Come on you guys, that ad was actually really funny!
I really think that some of the men here in particular are having a reaction to Timothee! It is funny, and obviously meant to be funny. Not taken seriously. I wonder if it was the equivalent young female beauty whether we would have seen the same kind of negative reaction from the crowd.
 
What do you mean? You're saying you can find more content on services that have been around for 10, 20 30, or in HBO's case - 50 years, Disney at 87 years - over one that's been producing for 3??? Well tickle me surprised.

Buying out a library means inheriting a bunch of contracts you didn't negotiate and then having to raise prices for the cost of acquisition. Better to buy the rights and develop the project. It's not for everyone but you don't have to pay for it if you don't want to. HBO/HBO Max is great. Tons of programming - unless it's one of the ones they've recently pulled so that they can claim it on insurance as a loss and save $$ on the royalties.
I joined Disney for one year at a reduced cost (no cost) when it launched. There was almost nothing watchable for an adult. I cancelled as soon as I would have been charged. Only since then have they greatly expanded their ‘adult’ movie catalog (though some might quibble to what degree superhero/comic movies are truly ‘adult’ — I’m divided on the subject) to include many, many more new blockbuster films, and of course new series. But of all of these, I have no interest in the 10,000 (and counting) Star Wars spin-off series. Just not of interest to me. Some of the new comic book series sound interesting. But not enough for me to resubscribe.

Apple TV may have a limited catalog, though it has grown quite well over the past three years, and there are quite a few series I have really, really enjoyed!

Slow Horses is AMAZING and one of my favorite series of the past 2 years. Really well made and just excellent adaptations! And the cast, I mean Gary Oldman.
Ted Lasso is fun (though maybe cloyingly sweet after 2 seasons), Truth Be Told was great, so were: Prehistoric Planet, Home, Mythic Quest (extremely funny and excellent cast), For All Mankind (great alternative history period piece and incredibly well done!), and Acapulco. I still haven’t watched (but want to): Bad Sisters, and Severance, and a few others.
Overall, it is one service (of the 6 to which I subscribe) that I am keeping year-round.

Hulu, Paramount, AMC+, Acorn, Britbox I’ll only subscribe to for a few months at a time. Overall just not enough quality programming to keep me invested for a full calendar year. I haven’t even watched anything on Peacock yet.

My feeling is that we’ll start seeing some more consolidation in services over the next 5 years, as these companies realize that just because Netflix can be a smash hit, doesn’t mean streaming is easy or easily profitable. Notice all of the cuts that Warner Bros/Discovery—whatever the heck they’re called now!—has just made, removing their own series(!) from the service and renting them out to other services. We’re going to see more of that in the next few years from the old broadcast types (Paramount, Peacock, maybe even Disney) as they all need the revenue.

EDIT: And I keep Netflix year-round. There is a lot of lower quality dreck, but still a lot of decent quality material as well. I also really, really, enjoy all of the ‘foreign’ series from Spain, France, Latin America, Germany, Norway, Italy, etc — and in their native tongues. None of the other US-based services have the kind of variety of sourced material/series which Netflix does. The hardest part of dealing with Netflix is their interface, which has gotten bogged down now that they have so much content.
But, I also think it IS important to continue to support a service which I want to continue to EXIST. Nothing would please the Disneys, Comcasts, WarnerBros-Discovery and Paramounts (or even Amazon) of the world than to see this service fail. Once that were to happen…well, fewer services will mean less competition, which is never a good thing for the consumer.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.