I don't get it. I'm not from the US.
But there's no reason to stick to Cali. They're an international company, expand your thought process.
But there's no reason to stick to Cali. They're an international company, expand your thought process.
OS X 10.9 would've been sufficient.
I don't get it. I'm not from the US.
Apple is not an "international company" in the context you're speaking of. Until their headquarters are worldwide they are not considered "International". They sell their products via worldwide distribution but at the end of the day they are home-based in California. Great state by the way.
----------
Perhaps but boring, and historically Apple has named all of their products. Why stop and turn it into a model number like every other tech company does?
----------
LOL, don't worry about getting it. Both of them are big idiots.
Don't call me an idiot and really, don't call me an idiot when you're arguing about something posted quite a while ago.I really don't care about the name nearly as much as you people do. Argue it out amongst yourselves. I stand by what I said.
Why do people care what it's called? As long as it works how i want it to, then i dont care what they called it.
Just call it OSX 10.9.
Would it be offensive to say that I couldn't give a **** less about something so incredibly trivial?
I save strong emotions, such as hate, for far more important things...like bad espresso.
![]()
Well, I'm offended at the cavalier way you just threw out ****. Was that really necessary?
Oh, and I don't give a second thought to what companies name things.
I always think of James Garner, but I'm old...