Don't call him an inventor. That's what.
Sounds like you’re jealous of his success?Don't call him an inventor. That's what.
And you know this how? Did you know him personally and interacted with him often? Or are you just going by the usual lying media reports?
I don't think Apple can take the big risks like the small Chinese knock-offs can. The resulting PR media onslaught could do irreparable harm to Apple, mores than any sluggish economy ever could. Apple has to be calculating. Steve was willing to gamble big buck then. Don't think the same should be done today.
presumptive. That is the flaw in your thinking.You’re hurt.
That’s ok.
... SJ is dead, and none of it matters or has any enduring effect on any future stories here.
Nobody can deny that SJ played a significant role in making Apple one of the most successful technological companies ever.
It would be incredibly shortsighted to ignore his contribution and fail to learn any lesson from it.
That is why we study history. All dead people, but the lessons that we can learn are very important indeed.
What lessons did Apple, after SJ’s death, learn?? Bent iPads are OK? Innovation is secondary?
What did “we” learn and how did it directly help “us”?
Rest nothing. Apple is going to get steamrolled by these Asian competitors because of their business model.Have YOU been instrumental in shaping the success of a number of trailblazing companies such as Apple, Next and Pixar?
As for the lessons that Apple should have learnt... I rest my case.