Thought I would update my impressions of these two apps now that I have tried TomTom 1.8 and Navigon 1.8.2. Basically, my opinion hasn't changed a whole lot, except that I think TomTom is even further ahead of Navigon now with their recent feature updates.
TomTom:
- With the addition of multi-point routes, MapShare, and destination announcement (i.e., "you have reached your destination on your right"), I really don't have anything left to complain about.
- That said, I think TomTom can improve the iPod controls. Give us a way to select a playlist or something. Right now it's just a play button and a skip track button. There is no way to select songs other than do so in the iPod/Music app first.
- The app is so solid at this point that I think TomTom can put some effort into making the map display and interface more iPhone like. I don't think there's anything wrong with the map - it's high-contrast and easy to read, but it does look a bit dated. Also, I sometimes feel like everything is just crammed down on the bottom bar. I often ignore the lane assist because it is just lumped in with everything else.
TomTom still amazes me with how good its routes are and how accurately it calculates ETAs. Other than on long highway trips where you can cut time by going way over the speed limit, the ETA from TomTom is almost always dead on. After using Navigon again, it made me appreciate TomTom's traffic implementation, and how thorough the driving instructions are. I bought TomTom when it was still $99 and 2 years later I think I got a bargain.
Navigon:
- The new lane assist is just sick. I love how it shows the lanes, which ones you should be in, and moves as you move. Very, very cool. My only complaint is that it pops up too often. If I'm going straight through an intersection, I don't think lane assist to this degree is necessary, especially since it covers up other route information, like ETA.
- As great as the lane assist diagram is, why haven't they added any type of voice instruction to go along with this? TomTom frequently says "stay in the right lane" and so on, but Navigon never says this. It's kind of dangerous to look down at the lane assist for any length of time.
- How in the hell have they STILL not added an "avoid road X" feature? This is basic functionality and to not have it is just bizarre. The "Block" feature is worthless, in my opinion, and definitely NOT a replacement for avoiding a road.
- A really weird quirk that I noticed yet again is that Navigon totally ignores turns if you stay on the same road. For example, say you are on route 25 and come to an intersection. To stay on route 25, you turn to the left. Going straight would put you onto a different road. If your route has you continuing on route 25, Navigon won't tell you to turn. In some cases, it completely ignores this and will only instruct you on your NEXT turn. If you aren't paying attention, you would go straight and Navigon would have to recalculate. In other cases, Navigon's instructions actually say "go straight ahead" even though the turn diagram shows a left turn. I hope that this is a bug, but it's been over a year since I noticed this.
- This also comes into play on highway interchanges. During one of my routes, I was on a two lane road merging onto an interstate. After the merge, the two lanes on the road I'm coming from become exits - I need to get into the leftmost lanes to stay on the interstate. TomTom handles this correctly, showing reality view with TWO separate "keep left" instructions. Navigon gives me no guidance at all - it just acts like I continue straight in whatever lane I'm currently in. There was NO lane assist for this interchange. This is a pretty bad weakness. If I didn't take this route all of the time, I would be horribly confused.
- Navigon's traffic is so poorly implemented that it's almost useless. Why is there no indication on screen that an incident is affecting your route? It seems like an easy thing to do - TomTom shows the traffic icon as green, orange, or red. Navigon just shows a big icon that is there whether traffic affects you or not. And why does the traffic list show stuff that is 200 miles away when my route is 10 miles long? Why do I have to go to a separate screen to see if anything is on my route? It's just weird. The way that they display traffic on the map is also weird, in my opinion.
- What the hell is the point of MyRoutes? I mean, when I am navigating in my own city, it's cool to see 3 options on screen, since I might want to go a certain way. However, the point of GPS is to help me get to somewhere when I don't know the way. In that scenario, what the hell difference does 3 routes make to me? I don't know any of them anyways so how would I know if one is better than the other?
- Voice instructions seem to come a little later in Navigon compared with TomTom. This typically isn't a problem, but there were some turns that I thought the voice was too late. Also, I think it's weird that Navigon doesn't announce what side of the road your destination is on until you've reached it.
- I still LOVE how Navigon puts the green bar at the top with the road sign you should be following when your next turn is onto or off of a highway. It does this when there is no reality view for the interchange. This is something I really wish TomTom did.
- That said, reality view in Navigon is a bit weak. The text on the road signs are way to small to be useful. Still, the lane diagram is really all you need I guess.
- POI search is still horrendous. You still have to enter the exact town that the POI is in to find it. Google search is still spotty for me. Sometimes it returns everything I would expect, other times I can't get anything to come back. It's still ridiculous to have to choose the exact village that a POI is in to search. What if you are in the middle of nowhere? How would you know what town you're in?
I don't mean to pile on with Navigon. They still have the best-looking map and the most iPhone-like interface. What annoys me is that the things I'm complaining about today are the same things that I complained about the last time I compared them. It makes me think that Navigon focuses on features instead of improving the routing, which should be the core feature of the application.
This is actually kind of funny because a year or so ago, I would have said, "wow, Navigon's traffic is so great... I love the reality view... it's so great that Navigon tells you what side the destination is on..." That's because TomTom didn't have any of these features. Now, TomTom has all of these features, and does them better than Navigon. TomTom has closed the gap that Navigon had on them, and now they are the ones with the gap on Navigon.
I honestly don't know how anyone could recommend Navigon over TomTom at this point. Navigon has no answer to MapShare (ability to submit or download map corrections through the app) or IQ Routes. These two features (maps and routing) are the core of any GPS navigation app.
It's funny what a pretty face will do, though. It seems like Navigon has blown TomTom out of the water in sales since both were released, and TomTom has a lower rating than Navigon. Just look at this poll, even - Navigon is winning 2:1. I really can't understand why. My only assumption is that people just think it looks better, or that they really can't justify $20 a year for (better) traffic implementation.