Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Oops, big mistake in my chart... I mixed the data from two computations, incorrecly. Hold on and I'll replace it. Sorry.

something didn't add up when I was doing the numbers, I noticed that it was way out of wack.

edit: looks like I revealed an error in Q's data.

*runs away yelling "I'm sorry, I'm Sorry don't ban me"*
 
Damn that's absurd...79% of the posts made by 50 people! Hahaha.

That can't be right.

Doctor Q- can you check your chart? I know our Top 50 are prolific, but 79%, no way.


Oops, reason # 498 why you should read the whole thread before commenting.
 
Not as pretty, but perhaps more accurate than my previous pie chart.

I should learn to do more double-checking before posting charts hot off the presses, but here I am doing it again!

By the way, this is based on the current Top 50, not the Top 50 from chart #2 or chart #3, which could produce even higher percentages for the top posters.
 

Attachments

  • Total-Posts-0701-0707.gif
    Total-Posts-0701-0707.gif
    27.1 KB · Views: 328
That's more like it...I had a lot of trouble believing that the previous chart was accurate, but I didn't think to question the accuracy of Q's stats. :p

The second chart is much more realistic, but the sheer number of posts put out by the top 50 posters is still impressive.
 
I've had to correct charts in the past, since I tend to post, THEN double-check. The time I spelled "mad jew" as "loony wiccan" was especially embarrassing.
 
Doctor Q, if you take the graph, rotate it a bit and do a bit of editing, it would look like a Q and be a suitable 'tar for you. :p
 
Doctor Q, if you take the graph, rotate it a bit and do a bit of editing, it would look like a Q and be a suitable 'tar for you. :p

As if I wasn't addicted enough to MR:
untitled-1___100___layer_1__rgb_8_-20070708-014150.jpg


Not worth it really, doesn't look so great...
 
Hey Q, I got some requests for the new numbers in 08. Is it possible to list the number of people that have fallen off the top 50 since your first list.
 
Hey Q, I got some requests for the new numbers in 08. Is it possible to list the number of people that have fallen off the top 50 since your first list.
Do you mean from July 2007 to August 2007 (since my first list in this thread) or do you mean from July 2003 to July 2007 (since my first list ever)?
 
Looks like i'm going to have to start posting in non demi areas for a month or two to maintain my place (am completely broke, thus can't renew for a bit).


It's weird and different.


Edit: some kind soul gifted me a renewal, thus all you non-demi's have nothing to fear as i'll keep my useless posting mostly to the private section again as per usual.
 
Do you mean from July 2007 to August 2007 (since my first list in this thread) or do you mean from July 2003 to July 2007 (since my first list ever)?
First list ever.

Looks like i'm going to have to start posting in non demi areas for a month or two to maintain my place (am completely broke, thus can't renew for a bit).


It's weird and different.
Don't take to long in coming back.
 
I hate to dig this up but I just realized this thread existed. ;)

Well if we're going to bump this thread today, we might as well have a good reason for it. The man at the top of the list has just passed a new MacRumors milestone. ;)
 
Well if we're going to bump this thread today, we might as well have a good reason for it. The man at the top of the list has just passed a new MacRumors milestone. ;)
Oh quite true.

I didn't realized I was so up and coming myself.

I'm still waiting for my "macrumors G4" time.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.