Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1. You can buy 2-3 Echo dots for the same price. 5 right now if you go with the previous gen.
2. Alexa has supported this for years.
3. Much, much more smart products support Alexa than Homekit, and cost generally half as much.
4. Yeah Alexa has also supported this for two years now.
5. Why do I need this? It's a cute gimmick but other than that I can continue playback on my Alexa devices with a voice command.

So let's see: close to whole home coverage for the price of one Homepod Mini thanks to the Best Buy sale going on right now, the same if not better functionality in regards to communication and control of smart devices around the home, easy stereo pairing that improves sound quality dramatically with minimal effort and supports ALL music streaming services including Apple's? Sorry, but no. Apple needs to try a lot harder and compromise on their ridiculous price margins a bit more before I'd ever consider abandoning my Echos for HomePods, Mini or otherwise.

Yeah you can buy 2 or 3 echo dots if you want it for basic functions and not good sounding music. But you do you
 
The regular HomePod requires WiFi, it’s not a Bluetooth speaker. So that may be another issue there
In the scenario I'm mainly thinking of using it, in our backyard, I have a strong wifi signal, so it was more an issue of not wanting to have to get one of my long extension cords to plug in a mini for those times when we want to listen to music or a podcast while sitting around a fire. We use a cheap BT speaker now, but it's not great for sound quality and it's definitely not a smart speaker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeadingHeat
I'd have to hear the sound quality before I pulled the trigger, even at $100. I don't exactly have a burning need to use Siri regularly, and the little Yamaha wifi speaker I bought a few years ago does nicely for streaming and AirPlay.
 
I think I’ll pick one up once available. Looking for something for background music in my home office and don’t need anything that takes up too much space.
 
“When paired up, two ‌HomePod‌ minis can create a more immersive sound experience.”

I believe this is the future of audio playback Someday all well recorded great music will be played back with two speakers. I’m not sure what it will be called yet but I bet it will be big!

That is amazing.

Hat's off to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepIn2U and I7guy
Not trying to troll, but for me the only reason I can‘t see myself buying any HomePods is Siri and her favorite “Here’s what I’ve found” answer to everything I ask, followed by a complete silence until I look down at my screen to see web search results. I’m wondering how that works on a HomePod..

Oh, it’s hilarious. She just says that and then nothing shows up on your phone/any other home device.

Seriously, this has happened to me before.

(*I love my HomePod…but we all know Apple’s weaknesses.)
 
When do you think we will get to read some reviews of the sound quality?

How early do Apple usually send samples out to the major review websites.?

no doubt they will go out to “influencers“ who wouldn’t know decent sound if it slapped them around their vacuous heads.
 
  • Love
Reactions: decypher44
can i play spotify on these? BBC radio? until then i could not even consider them. i have a pair of Sonos Ones. fantastic sound!
 
btw... do you know if the current Apple TV also supports this? ... I've been wanting to upgrade my Apple TV 3, but if this is coming then I will probably wait.

no, the current ATV doesn’t support it. I’m in a similar situation of needing a second aTV and am waiting to see if there is a new one coming in the near future. I’m guessing built in thread will be a standard feature of any future devices they sell with the intent of acting as HomeKit hubs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regbial
can i play spotify on these? BBC radio? until then i could not even consider them. i have a pair of Sonos Ones. fantastic sound!
If Apple could do a deal with BBC Radio in the UK they would sell loads, i would definitely buy one if they did.

Unfortunately i don't think it will happen any time soon.
 
Trust me. Intercom = watch walkie talkie feature. Ie. Fun for a day and then never used again.
 
One word: privacy. I’d rather trust Apple with my home’s smart products and conversations than Amazon. Sure, no company is probably 100% safe but with Apple touting privacy in everything they do, I know it’s at least on the forefront of their minds.

They put it at the forefront of your mind.

They got caught doing exactly what they said they didn’t do...listening, recording and being reviewed by human beings. (Admitted and explained as trying to make your experience better)

By default you have to give permission with Echo and Google products to do that. With Apple you have to actively opt out. You can also switch the mics off, cameras (if fitted) off
 
Last edited:
In the scenario I'm mainly thinking of using it, in our backyard, I have a strong wifi signal, so it was more an issue of not wanting to have to get one of my long extension cords to plug in a mini for those times when we want to listen to music or a podcast while sitting around a fire. We use a cheap BT speaker now, but it's not great for sound quality and it's definitely not a smart speaker.
You can use the HomePod without a WiFi signal.
 
...
They got caught doing exactly what they said they didn’t do...listening, recording and being reviewed by human beings. (Admitted and explained as trying to make your experience better)
...
As described in the TOS, so no real surprise there, except for those who like to catch Apple on the sub-nuances.
 
will wait for the reviews and then might try one ... and if I really like it, might just bite the bullet and get the regular one on sale for 199
 
... you don't think Apple is listening, despite being busted last year for doing just that?
First they said Siri doesn't record ANYTHING, then they said Siri only records ACTIVE requests for quality assurance, then they said their iOS API's prevented other apps from listening in without notifying you. Well they lied, they lied again after getting caught lying the first time, and last week I was presented with ads for rotary sushi restaurants on four separate apps that were not running at that time an hour after mentioning it in a phone conversation. I HATE sushi, I haven't discussed, searched for or even thought about sushi let alone restaurants that serve it rotary style in years, which is how that topic came up in conversation as I was discussing how a place that used to be popular in high school was shutting down because of dropping sales blamed on the Rona. But please, Apple, tell me again how Siri and iOS protect my "privacy."

Alexa devices have a hard button on the top to mute their mics completely. I don't see that functionality anywhere on the HomePod line, hardware or software based. If you're placing a a smart speaker in your home, you need to accept that your conversations are going to be recorded and used for marketing purposes etc. If you cannot abide this, don't get a smart speaker, but at least don't kid yourself into thinking Apple is any different than Amazon in regards to this issue because they've already lied a couple times about it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/28/apple-apologizes-for-listening-to-siri-conversations.html
The only fault of Apple’s I see there was not being more transparent, as they have a tendency to not be, to a fault. I can reasonably believe Apple when they say that they recorded audio only to improve Siri’s success rate because that is in line with their business model, not selling personal data. Alexa on the other hand cannot be trusted because of Amazon’s advertising and data-selling business model.

Edit-
Just double checked myself and it’s not clear if Amazon sells data, maybe not. But they definitely use personal data for their own marketing purposes.
 
Last edited:
As described in the TOS, so no real surprise there, except for those who like to catch Apple on the sub-nuances.

Now it’s in the TOS (overtly, rather than being buried) after they get caught and having to admit to paying subcontractors to listen to Siri messages. First they denied it, then admitted it, then stopped it, and now acknowledged they need to do it ,and so do it after asking users to opt in.
 
I did not pay attention to how it was powered, so if this is the case, that it's just going to need a USB-C connection, then it does make it somewhat portable when using a USB-C battery pack. It will be handy for using by the fire pit this fall / winter.
I wonder if it can function away from WiFi by connecting with an iPhone for internet or airplay. That would make it truly portable. One would need a pretty high capacity battery pack though I’d bet.

Unless everything on your TV is coming from your AppleTV, they're not very well suited as a TV speaker system. You're much better off going for something like Sonos ARC.

If they add ARC to AppleTV a setup like the one you describe would be more interesting, although Sonos would still have much better sound, have a better Apple Music interface than Apple[*], support more services and still support Airplay2.

[*] Apple, please separate your own playlists from the Apple Music playlists you like...
I got antennae channels routed through my Apple TV with an HDHomerun. Only thing left now is my Blu-ray player, which I do like to use for special movies and shows. I wish that could be routed through my Apple TV as well, and playback controlled via an Apple TV app, but that would require probably an hdmi cable from the player to the Apple TV, which isn’t possible unfortunately. Not to mention someone would need to make the software. There are other limitations of using homepods as home theater speakers too. Due to the delay of airplay, it’s not feasible for games, karaoke, navigation sounds, and airplay video mirroring. Though with airplay video mirroring, I would think Apple could just delay the video to match the audio.

I don’t understand ARC very well.. If it was added to Apple TV, what kind of setup would that allow? What would be connected to what?
 
Now it’s in the TOS (overtly, rather than being buried) after they get caught and having to admit to paying subcontractors to listen to Siri messages. First they denied it, then admitted it, then stopped it, and now acknowledged they need to do it ,and so do it after asking users to opt in.
No, there was no caught. I was in the TOS all along, just that people didn't read it. That is what I call a "sub-nuance". Most of corporate america augments their IT workforce with contractors who are subject to the same confidentiality of employees. Of course, employee or contractor under NDA, can't stop someone from breaching their employment contract.

They may have denied it, because that's business in corporate america, but it doesn't mean their customers weren't protected. However, now there are additional options, but it didn't mean before-hand the data wasn't handled with the utmost of confidentiality. Again, catching Apple on the sub-nuances with a narrow view of the entirety of the thing.
 
I get perfectly good sound for my needs from the Echo+, I didn't buy the Homepod as I just didn't value it at its original price or even the reduced price today.

I will however give the mini a try, it is attractive to me at that price and I can't see the sound being worse than the echo.
 
I’m confused about using HomePod minis as a home theater system with Apple TV. I already have a sound bar connected to my Apple TV. Can I use 2 HomePod minis as rear speakers that will only produce sound for rear channels, or will it just reproduce sound coming from the sound bar? In other words, will you get the same sound everywhere, or individual sounds (like 5.1 surround sound) using the sound bar as a front channel and 2 HomePod minis as rear channels?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.