Change means forwards, mate, not backwardsWOW! Open to change much anyone? Geez. Air for me and only look forward.
Finally. Car manufacturers need to stop allowing Apple and Google interfaces on their platforms. Native software is always better than the glitchy experience of trying to connect CarPlay (e.g., bluetooth won't connect or drops). CarPlay is currently a nightmare of interface issues, audio dropouts, and clashes with the integrated system (e.g. "Another device is trying to play audio")GM to Remove CarPlay from All Future Vehicles, Including Gas Cars
Yes, the savings of .42 ounces certainly makes the Air seem less boat-anchorish.I went for the Air and absolutely love it. ...
it’s great having a phone with me that doesn’t feel like a boat anchor..
I vaguely remember that EV trucks don't do all that well with range when towing. I'm sure that's a ding people make on the Tesla Cybertruck. (Home of many dings...)We’re buying the GMC Sierra EV to tow our RV. Yes it’s expensive but it will more than pay for itself with gas savings over its lifetime (I estimate almost $90K fuel savings). Yes we travel a lot.
Styrofoam had been available since the late 1940s/early 1950s, so Wood could have used it to build parts of his sets, as some other filmmakers did, but it was still more expensive than cardboard and plywood for the same surface area and volume, so being Ed Wood, he probably didn't use it, though I've always wondered what The Amazing Criswell was made of.Cardboard. Like a cheap Ed Wood set. (I don't think they had styrofoam back then did they?)
No way, every ounce, every gram matters to Apple. Who needs to physically carry a large battery on your cell phone? I may buy a second air mag safe to just have in case I’d like to go for 36hrs without touching a wall charger.Apple's "thin, thin, thin" innovation trajectory was always going to end in tears.
People have been questioning this obsession for years, especially at the expense of battery life and other key features. The iPhone Air is a perfect example of how that obsession eventually creates untenable compromises that even the most loyal fans and early adopters can't abide.
All that said… I find it interesting that the MacBook Airs are NOT "thin, thin, thin" anymore, but instead are just feature-stripped versions of the Pros.
The perceived difference seems to be a psychological thing: when two objects are close to the same weight, but are distinctly different sizes (at least in some dimension, like thickness), the one that's smaller will sometimes be perceived by some people to be lighter by a wider margin than it actually is. It's called the size–weight illusion. But oddly, the illusion usually goes in the other direction: the larger object is usually perceived to be the lighter one, since we automatically expect the larger object to be heavier. When it's not, compared to a smaller object you heft alternately with the larger object, our brain overcorrects and imagines it to be the lighter of the two objects. The smaller object feels heavier because it’s heavier than expected for its size compared to the larger object.Yes, the savings of .42 ounces certainly makes the Air seem less boat-anchorish.
And Chinese brands like Huawei are working on their Air model as well, so what Apple is doing is still revolutionary and the absolute pioneer in innovation and engineeringI am going to have to object to the "Iphone Air flops" title. It sold astoundingly well in China and its still too early to determine that. Very unfair to Apple.
Hi, James.Why have Liquid Glass if you’re going to have a toggle for it. I wish forstall was back at apple.
James