you are missing the point. in the article you gave us it says that it will be slower because of the multi cell levels. all we can go off is past reputation and intel has been the best by far.
HERE is one of many comparison tests out there.
lol.
What point am I missing? I posted some info on Toshiba's NEW 512 Gb SSD and asked whether or not people thought it would be incorporated into the new Macbook Pros--because Apple currently uses Toshiba as their supplier for SSDs.
A bunch of people completely ignored the point of my post, and continued to rave about Intel's SSDs.
I know Intel makes great SSDs. I never said they didn't. I would love to have one, but their capacities are too small for my tastes, currently.
You are the one who is comparing Toshiba's old capabilities to Intel's capabilities. If you bothered to click on the link about this SSD, it acknowledges that the old Toshiba has lower specs compared to the Intel.
And if you bothered to read about the new one, it shows that the specs are pretty good compared to the Intel (240 vs. 250 read, with a higher write, and a much larger capacity).
Instead of succumbing to group-think, don't you think actually considering new information would be a wiser choice?
This is a discussion about the new drive from Toshiba (if anyone has any inside information about it that is not available via google) and whether or not it is likely Apple will start incorporating this into their lineup (because they use Toshiba for SSDs currently).
I love Intel performance just as much as the next guy, but I will need a laptop in the next three months or so and if Apple begins offering the 512 gb Toshiba drive I think that would be perfect for my personal needs.
I don't think I could put up with the small capacity of a SLC or what Intel currently has to offer. Their upcoming 320gb drive may be a contender, but I don't think that will be released until much later this year.