Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is there anyone who'd really rather have the dynamic island instead of a slightly larger top bezel?

I've seen PC laptops with very tiny bezels with pretty nice camera/sensor setups. Hard to believe Apple really needs the cutout.
This has always been my complaint about notches/holes on iPhone screens as well. I doubt they would have lost any customers if they had a thin top bezel for camera/sensor hardware.

And they could implement the “Dynamic Island” notification scheme the same way on a screen without a hole in it, plus experimentation with alternative notification schemes would not be constrained by having to acknowledge you have a freaking hole in the screen.
 
Is there a reason why MacRumors has seemingly changed its editorial policy so as to state process technologies as now belonging to Apple? This has appeared a few times recently in this format, and I can't work out how it's justifiable.

Yes, it's a minor detail, but it's also repeat disinformation - Apple does not manufacture semiconductors, and does not have a '2-nanometer process' or any semiconductor 'process' of any kind. TSMC has a 2-nanometer processes, over which Apple has no ownership.
Just think of the number of times Apple has stated an "Apple designed..." something at a keynote. You don't hear them saying Apple designed chips made on TSMC's 2nm node. Simplicity sells.

Who asked for a touchscreen?
I also would like to meet this person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpotOnT and brucemr
A day one purchase for me.
People are going to poopoo the touchscreen all day and all night, but for accessibility needs this is absolutely huge.
Like, the biggest update to Mac accessibility since the introduction of VoiceOver in 2005.
 
There has to be more to this. Just adding touch seems so unusual and Apple has said over and over again why they won’t do it. Reaching seems so much less efficient regardless of UI tweaks. Now if the keyboard is detachable and then suddenly it’s like an iPad running iOS that would be amazing. But battery and everything under keyboard so that doesn’t seem to be doable. Now if the trackpad area was a touch screen somehow that could open possibilities since the main problem with Touch ID was it was out of reach (a touch screen is Even more out of reach. So either there is some radical change and new approach or they simply are adding for the smaller niche use case for some creatives that it would be beneficial. But the cost and power to do that for a smaller subset of users still seems odd.
 
OLED sounds good but the ergonomics of a touch screen I personally wouldn't like to use on a laptop. I'm also thinking about the display coating required to be flawless with the more frequent cleaning.

Something I did wish for though for the notch of my M2, is customising for more icons to be able to appear on the left side of the notch. Obviously currently there is the menu items of whatever is currently opened and a huge gap to the notch.
 
I agree. Seems quite strange. March to November/December?
Not strange at all.
Look at these previous upgrade patterns…

Bigger MacBook Pro updated twice, both in May 2019 (15.4 inch) and November 2019 (16 inch that replaced it at same price).
13 inch MacBook Pro updated twice in 2020, once in May (Intel) and in November(M1).
14 and 16 updated twice in 2023, once in January (M2Pro/Max) and again in October (M3, M3Pro/Max).
Go back even further and you can find plenty of examples, the MacBook Pro was updated twice in 2006, 2008, 2011, 2013…
 
This is funny given how anti-touch screen they were on laptops.

When I got an iPad Pro and added the Magic Keyboard with touchpad, it was like my iPad was a new device. I preferred using the touchpad over the regular touch screen.

Now they’re adding touch to the laptop.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.