That's the last year I'm enabling that. That was a dreadful experience.
yeah the math ain't mathing. there was way more enthusiasm for Harris than there was for BidenTrump won, but what I find fascinating is how Kamala is sitting at 66M votes a full 15M below Joe’s hard-to-believe 81M.
Thank you Apple News!
... in our online echo chamber. Basically she was seen as an extension of Biden and the other side's messaging was "Biden made eggs cost more."yeah the math ain't mathing. there was way more enthusiasm for Harris than there was for Biden
Adorable.... in our online echo chamber. Basically she was seen as an extension of Biden and the other side's messaging was "Biden made eggs cost more."
Gonna be a crappy 4+ years.
That's the last year I'm enabling that. That was a dreadful experience.
It's bad to run the same scam twice in a row. They assumed their lawfare would work, when it didn't they banked everything on tweedle-splat and tweedle-dumb.yeah the math ain't mathing. there was way more enthusiasm for Harris than there was for Biden
I thought it was awesome! I didn't like the results but am taking a deep breath and a wait and see attitude.
You know there are millions of ballots yet to tally, don't you?Trump won, but what I find fascinating is how Kamala is sitting at 66M votes a full 15M below Joe’s hard-to-believe 81M.
what you are talking about is rank-choice voting. Missouri just voted to ban it. so don't expect it anytime soon. we might have had our last presidential election anyway.We should implement a negative vote our elections. If enough people use the negative votes on both the D's and R's, we would finally have a viable 3rd party option.
I voted Bernie Sanders even though he isn't on the ballot.🤨
No. An actual negative vote, one that negates a vote casted for that candidate. What we have now, if you hate both candidate, you vote for the one you hate less (or throw your vote away on a 3rd Party). The negative vote you get to voice you displeasure with a particular candidate in a meaningful way.what you are talking about is rank-choice voting. Missouri just voted to ban it. so don't expect it anytime soon. we might have had our last presidential election anyway.
oh i get ya.No. An actual negative vote, one that negates a vote casted for that candidate. What we have now, if you hate both candidate, you vote for the one you hate less (or throw your vote away on a 3rd Party). The negative vote you get to voice you displeasure with a particular candidate in a meaningful way.
Welcome to Amerizuela!what you are talking about is rank-choice voting. Missouri just voted to ban it. so don't expect it anytime soon. we might have had our last presidential election anyway.
Makes you wonder if 2020 was legit.Trump won, but what I find fascinating is how Kamala is sitting at 66M votes a full 15M below Joe’s hard-to-believe 81M.
Thank you Apple News!
Elon Musk is one smart very "techie" dude, No?Trump won, but what I find fascinating is how Kamala is sitting at 66M votes a full 15M below Joe’s hard-to-believe 81M.
Thank you Apple News!
The propositions are always sleazily written. like in Missouri, they tacked on "noncitizens to vote" yet that was already a thing, and are required to show your ID (voter ID or photo) so they trick the uninformed that don't fully read it.The US voters have solidly rejected ranked choice voting propositions this year:
https://ballotpedia.org/Results_for...V)_and_electoral_system_ballot_measures,_2024