nothing is ever truly deleted from the internet. Deleted just means: "set visibility to 0"This tells me that your deleted photos are never really deleted.
nothing is ever truly deleted from the internet. Deleted just means: "set visibility to 0"This tells me that your deleted photos are never really deleted.
What law do you think prohibits Apple storing photos?
What law do you think prohibits Apple storing photos?
Apple doesn't handle storage for icloud, Google handles data storage.
![]()
Apple confirms it uses Google's cloud for iCloud
A document contains Apple's first public acknowledgment that it is storing data for its iCloud services in Google's data centers.www.cnbc.com
This is illegal, at least in the UK and EUnothing is ever truly deleted from the internet. Deleted just means: "set visibility to 0"
Indeed that's the NSFW photo I'm hoping doesn't "pop up" again"They must be holding it wrong..."
That's not how cloud object storage works. If these photos are really restored from cloud, Apple must have kept references to them (in addition to the decryption keys), otherwise they'd have no IDs to retrieve the data, even if Google kept the stored data. The way to safely delete objects from cloud storage is to delete the decryption keys, then it doesn’t matter if the encrypted object still exists somewhere or not.Doesn't Apple use Google Cloud as their cloud provider?
Maybe this isn't an Apple issue but rather an Alphabet/Google Cloud issue.
![]()
Apple is now Google's largest corporate customer for cloud storage | AppleInsider
Apple has dramatically increased the amount of data that it stores on Google's cloud services, suggesting that its storage needs have grown faster than it can handle with its own servers.appleinsider.com
It makes no difference. Apple is responsible as they are the ones with the TOS agreement.
If they've kept personal photos that individuals have deleted, that is plain illegal (at least in the UK and EU). This means Apple is saying NOTHING on this. Expect a very quiet fix, very soon.Indeed that's the NSFW photo I'm hoping doesn't "pop up" again
But yeah as Ricky said, Tim Apple has some esplainin' to do regarding what "deleted" means
fascinating theory. I have a weird feeling this story is going to unfold quite a bit as techies do their best to figure out what’s going on here—would be quite the spectacle if an “invisible whistleblower” is unveiled.I wondered if the rogue programmer did this on purpose to let us know that it was never really deleted? Kind of like an invisible whistleblower. I know, as a programmer, it's R.E.A.D. (Read. Edit. Add. Delete).
This is incredible spin.The lack of insight in this article is troubling.
If photos are re-appearing after they were deleted years ago, it is not a new bug. It is, in fact, new fix. If the photo had been actually deleted, it should be gone. If it was not actually deleted and was instead orphaned, it should appear in the library until properly deleted. An orphaned photo not appearing as a serious spec.
An alternative would’ve been to delete the orphan photos, but then you wouldn’t know that they had never been deleted until now.
This is an honest bug fix.
I mean the cause of it is not really going to change the fact that "deleted" photos weren't deleted. I think the reaction is warranted here. Despite the belief of some, Apple is not perfect.I’m just glad that nobody is overreacting and everyone is patiently waiting for clarity on the issue.
Dear God, it’s worst than we thoughtApple doesn't handle storage for icloud, Google handles data storage.
![]()
Apple confirms it uses Google's cloud for iCloud
A document contains Apple's first public acknowledgment that it is storing data for its iCloud services in Google's data centers.www.cnbc.com
What do you mean by "overwritten by newer data"?Files on a Mac's hard drive can be recovered as long as they haven't been overwritten by newer data.
this is the reality of modern day software. Nothing would get released if the goal was 'no bugs'There were only how many betas? I can’t with the bugs. It gets worse and worse. How are they expected to introduce AI on 18 when they still can’t get 17 right? Just my opinion.
No-one is worried about the bug, iOS is a little buggy these days, we all understand that. Its the fact that the bug shows Apple are not deleting user photos after the user has requested deletion. That is illegal in most parts of the western world, morally wrong from a personal privacy point of view, and hypocrisy from a brand that prides itself on being a bastion of personal privacyThe lack of insight in this article is troubling.
If photos are re-appearing after they were deleted years ago, it is not a new bug. It is, in fact, new fix. If the photo had been actually deleted, it should be gone. If it was not actually deleted and was instead orphaned, it should appear in the library until properly deleted. An orphaned photo not appearing as a serious spec.
An alternative would’ve been to delete the orphan photos, but then you wouldn’t know that they had never been deleted until now.
This is an honest bug fix.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the state of Apple Software QC (or complete lack thereof) in 2024. So much for that "security" paying the premium price and living in a walled garden gets you.
The vulnerabilities were communicated to Samsung more than 3 months ago, but the Korean manufacturer has so far done nothing about it, say engineers at Google Project Zero.