Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
doesn't apple have like $200 billion in the bank? like jesus christ buy some factories, companies, or whatever to get production what it needs to be smh
It doesn't work that way unfortunately, money can't solve all the manufacturing problems, it does help with some problems. It takes time to bring up manufacturing capacity for new technologies.
[doublepost=1506368914][/doublepost]
So get this, the design model that should of been the choice for ALL the iPhones this year is delayed due to a "feature" literally no one wanted or asked for.
LOL
due to a "feature" literally no one wanted or asked for.
No one asked for Touch ID either.
Manufacturers know what technology is available & what technology can be included in their gadgets.
 
And miss out on all the huge queues and hype around who has and hasn't got one? No, better to have short supply and drip feed the masses while they save up to pay for it.
or , you know, just have your phones explode. whatever floats your boat. or sinks it.
 
It‘s a great phone, but it‘s just not ready to market if all true of course. Same happened with the EarPods. If you hit the markets, full supply has to be assured throughout the entire supply chain. Of course there are peaks at the beginning of the shipments, but poor yield rates should be solved during prototyping.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tatsuki
Something must have happened where they decided later than normal that they wanted to do Face ID over Touch ID. The fact that the couldn't get Touch ID underneath the screen forced them to use their backup technology that they may have been planning for future iPhones, but not for the X
If any of that is true it's all unacceptable. These things are supposed to be planned out far in advance to avoid exactly the situation we have now. It makes Apple management look like a complete joke.
 
doesn't apple have like $200 billion in the bank? like jesus christ buy some factories, companies, or whatever to get production what it needs to be smh

Well, after being purchased, these factories will still have those poor yield rates, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mactendo
The workers assemble it, and spend another 20 minutes asking around, shuffling through manuals and calling their supervisors to see if their iPhone X also has a weird notch at the top, and if it’s supposed to be that way.

My take on what’s causing the slowdown.
:D
 
No way you mean their are “delays” this year just like every other year....we get it marketing 101...see you launch day at 8am at the local T-Mobile just like every year “delayed” flagship device!
 
Something tells me these fancy cameras, dot projector, etc. are going to be real delicate and might not hold up so well under a drop. I'm betting on some kind of "facegate".

This is one case where I'm happy to wait for iPhone XI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mactendo
doesn't apple have like $200 billion in the bank? like jesus christ buy some factories, companies, or whatever to get production what it needs to be smh

You would think if their are problems... money solves everything.. Not always true. But ya more factories would probably be a good idea.
 
Apple's fiscal year runs from October 1 - September 30, which would mean that the full production ramp-up will be achieved by late March.
March 2017 is when they should of been finished and ramping up production for this phone. Haven’t they learned from past years yet...
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlphaGuitarist
Dear Phil Schiller,

Another year, another iPhone launch supply shortage, huh?

Well, Phil... the sh*t’s getting tired, bro. Those of us that have been following this stuff for quite some time can see through the artificial shortage crapola. Every year, the leading tech company on Earth (that has more money than God) seems to not have the intelligence nor the global resources needed to pull off a successful launch that sees that every person that wants a new iPhone of their choice, gets a new iPhone of their choice. I mean, after all, they are willing to pay the (rather high) price to be on board with planet Earth’s latest and greatest premium pocket computer from the one company they trust to deliver the wonderful experience they have come to expect. You really shouldn’t let them down. Yet, year after year, I see and hear people that are disappointed and yes, let down, by the lack of supply at launch. You mean to tell me... that APPLE, of all companies, doesn’t have the time or ability to supply adequate amounts of the iPhone variations to customers at launch? I don’t believe it for one minute.

As they say in jolly ol’ England, “I call bullocks!”

Your marketing tactics are tired and your paid marketing outlets (Macrumors, Bloomberg, Ming Chi Kuo) have become more obvious to people like me than a turd floating at the top of a holiday punch bowl. Spare us the drama of drumming up the fanboys on your pro-Apple media sites to help build word-of-mouth hype and an “air of exclusivity” that comes from actually obtaining a device at launch. People want their product... in hand... on launch day. You lose many potential sales from people that are excited and ready to spend, sometimes spontaneously, to be among the first to have "the new shiny" in-hand on day one.

Your company has enough money and people working for it that you could stack iPhones to the effing moon and back within a few months’ time. Cut the BS, quit playing supply and demand games and start supplying an adequate amount of product at launch. You’ll piss less people off, gain a little more market share and, as a side effect, build a reputation as THE company that delivers. I heard a very wise man once say, “Real artists ship!” I personally believe you’d be wise to pay attention to that man’s words now, in 2017, and beyond.

Want to ensure the iPhone sells record-breaking amounts well into the future, Phil? I can help with that. All without playing supply/demand games, too. I have ideas, man - good ideas. No... make that... extraordinary, phenomenal ideas that would surely prove to be magical, if you were to give them a chance. My personal phone number is listed along with the rest of my iCloud and Apple ID credentials somewhere on your North Carolina data center servers. I give you my explicit permission to use any of that information you find necessary to contact me regarding a mutually beneficial job offer. (LOL)
 
Last edited:
Apple has $250 billion on hand because they're smart with their money.

Sure, they could spend hundreds of millions of dollars or billions on new production machines and floor space and labor and supplies.

But in a few months when supply has caught up with demand they'll have all that investment sitting idle and not earning them any money.

Instead they'll just take a few extra months to ramp up production and use that capital to fund other aspects of Apple like their R&D division.

Apple has the big picture in mind.

Having the big picture in mind is fine, but you have to be prepared for the small details to bite you in the rear occasionally as well.
 
They may create more demand by being so constrained of supply and hard to get but this is really BS. This whole waiting game after a launch is getting old real quick. But we as the consumer can stop it. If just 10 million of us switched to Android this year they would make sure this doesn’t happen again. You guys say new tech has no handbook or timeline for it to work. Then don’t put it in a phone that is not going to be ready in time. And don’t make us pay extra for a feature that is years old and should be included in the box!(fast-ish charging) lol rant over. Oh wait, I will still Pre order Like a slave. Lol
 
I kind of like it. They're doing something really new for the first time in a long time. It's exciting, and expensive, but really cool, too. It's going to be a bit of a beta situation for awhile but it looks like they did a good job of it according to the few people who got to try it out.
I'm looking forward to trying one out. My mobile contract (in UK here) is up in April next year. Hopefully anything buggy will be ironed out by then; but I may just keep my iPhone 6S until later in the year (2nd gen iPX or added smaller/larger model?)

To not replace the SE with an either reduced form 8/8+ or smaller iPX would be crazy. I'm missing the smaller form factor I had in the 5S that my girlfriend now has. Hopefully the penny will drop with Apple that there is a market for smaller phones as most manufacturers are leaving smaller form factor design.
 
supply will be so bad at launch that most likely no one will have get until next year

Wrong. Take the time to Think about your statement for a second. You honestly think that Apple is not going to have the capability to deliver the iPhone X across the world to almost "no one" until next year? Do you have Any idea what that would do to the stock and/or affect the shareholders if Apple couldn't deliver iPhones to almost no one until next year? If That's your theory, Then answer this, Then why would they even have a November 3 launch, if they weren't confident they can at least have an equitable amount stock delivered to those who properly pre-order OR purchase in store.
 
NASA and DARPA push tech to the limits. Apple is hacking together a "facial recognition" system that animates poop emojis.
Emoji is just one of the secondary features of that system. Apple is actually building a future here, right now. Before that you had true facial recognition only in sci-fi or spy movies and, probably, in Area 51 or military locations. But in a few years it will be in every smartphone and we'll get smart locks with facial recognition, just like now we can get a fingerprint door lock.
Same with Apple AR thing.
 
Emoji is just one of the secondary features of that system. Apple is actually building a future here, right now. Before that you had true facial recognition only in sci-fi or spy movies and, probably, in Area 51 or military locations. But in a few years it will be in every smartphone and we'll get smart locks with facial recognition, just like now we can get a fingerprint door lock.
Same with Apple AR thing.
This is FAR from TRUE facial recognition.
 
This is FAR from TRUE facial recognition.
Why? Are you an expert in this area? Can you explain or give a link to some info on this topic?
I'm not an expert, but from what Apple has shown it looks like it's a first step toward a real and mass market facial recognition. And they claim it's x100 times safer than a fingerprint solution, so it looks like something true and safe.
 
By saying "purchasing factories", I'm quite sure the person meant building new factories - which would, indeed, increase yield rates. I'm guessing (and could be wrong) that you didn't pick up on that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.