Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Trumps tax and spending bill that got voted through the House yesterday will add trillions to national debt whilst cutting taxes for billionaires 👍

Meanwhile there’s increasingly loud speculation that the reason he keeps making wild economic statements and imposing then removing tariffs is in order to manipulate the markets for personal gain.

He’s not shaking anything up, it’s the biggest shake down of all time. If you thought the country was in a hole before then whoa boy just you wait.

He’s not gonna go away quietly either, him and his acolytes are here to stay.
Don't forget cutting key things most MAGA voters rely on. Let the leopards eat their own faces.
 
my question is, are the shareholders paying that 25% tax as well? or is it just being passed on to the consumer?
Yes. In installments.
The threat sent Apple shares tumbling 3% in pre-market trading Friday.
That’s how it works.

Everyone holding Apple shares either directly or indirectly in a retirement fund (a lot of us) lost future income this morning thanks to Trump’s petulant tweet and nothing more.

If he keeps this up, everyone’s losses will continue.
 
I initially supported Trump’s tariff policies, hoping they would lead to positive economic changes. However, the results were disappointing. His approach often felt erratic—one day announcing steep tariffs of 125% on certain countries, and the next claiming those countries were pleading with him to reduce them, celebrating what he called a victory.

Then came his comments on the India-Pakistan conflict. He described it as a centuries-old dispute over Kashmir, seemingly unaware that the issue dates back to 1947, when both India gained independence and Pakistan was founded. It was disheartening to hear such inaccuracies, especially from a sitting president. I used to think Americans were simply misinformed when I saw videos suggesting a lack of global awareness, but when the president himself demonstrates such a lack of understanding, it’s hard to stay optimistic.
That's because Trump is an empty suit. He's a con artist who spent his whole life building an image of himself that is a complete fabrication. He portrayed himself as a successful businessman while bankrupting companies and stiffing contractors. His most famous book was written by someone else. His most successful project was a television show in which he did what he does best, pretend to be a successful businessman. He doesn't actually know anything about tariffs or the economy and he doesn't much care, just as he doesn't care about conservatism or Republicans or taxes or even immigration. He just wants a throne and a chance to grift lots of money.
 
Does Trump just think a bunch of military helicopters can fly in, latch on some cables and then lift and relocate an overseas manufacturing plant?

Yes… yes he probably does ...
And the Chinese, who work for $5 an hour in the factories, are coming along directly? At least until the Americans are trained to the point where they can work as quickly and as cheaply as the Chinese labourers?
Is there no one around Agent Orange who will tell him the bitter truth that the former industrialised countries produce far too expensively? This is not just a problem for the USA. The question is, how long will the Chinese be happy with $5 an hour? Maybe at some point the Chinese will want to live off the land as well as we do in the so-called developed countries. The era of colonialism, conquest and the displacement of indigenous people is over!
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
I agree with most of this here, but what is irritating is you can call it a 25% trump tax all you want, my question is, are the shareholders paying that 25% tax as well? or is it just being passed on to the consumer? Why?

Yes to both. Have you seen AAPL's performance with all this tariff uncertainty? AAPL is down about 20% year to date. There are the shareholders paying for the tax.

Its not about the tariff to me. Its about who is paying for it. This is a fight between consumers and brand loyalty IMO.
If you want transparency, go ahead and put "Trump tax 25% more expensive so we can continue to be the richest company on the planet because the only person paying for it is you"

As I showed, shareholders are paying for it. Apple has been eating inflation for years and not passing the costs on to consumers. Look at the cost of the iPhone X in 2018 -- $1000. Look at the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro (which is actually a step up from the iPhone X) in 2024 -- $1000. Apple was able to keep consumer costs the same through supply chain efficiencies and by increasing services, which are high margin.

I dont think it was American consumers decision to move Apple production to China. It was greed and cheap labor, and now consumers are again expected to pay for it, not the companies profit margin.

Do you happen to know Apple's profit margins in the early 1980s? They were not that far off what they have been recently. Apple had lower periods, but the company has always been a high margin company. The $2500 Mac in 1984 is like $7000 now. We'll call the $1300 iMac the comparable computer. Would you be willing to spend $7000 for a base model iMac? It might not be that high with developed in-country supply lines, but would certainly be closer to $5000. The $1000 iPhone would easily be $4000.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Make Apple Great Again! 🤡

B2EF3BEE-B523-49DC-805C-8D487A6409B5.png
 
Looks like Tim Apple wasted $1 million payoff to this wannabe mob boss.
The Qataris give him an aeroplane for $400 million, what's $1 million? Nothing!
I wouldn't be surprised that Agent Orange has enriched himself through his erratic policies and the resulting fluctuating stock market prices.

His great fascist role model from Germany also enriched himself unrestrainedly during his years in power, in the end he was one of the richest men in the country as a former failed painter. This is typical of dictators, they like to line their own pockets until they burst.
 
Yes to both. Have you seen AAPL's performance with all this tariff uncertainty? AAPL is down about 20% year to date. There are the shareholders paying for the tax.



As I showed, shareholders are paying for it. Apple has been eating inflation for years and not passing the costs on to consumers. Look at the cost of the iPhone X in 2018 -- $1000. Look at the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro (which is actually a step up from the iPhone X) in 2024 -- $1000. Apple was able to keep consumer costs the same through supply chain efficiencies and by increasing services, which are high margin.



Do you happen to know Apple's profit margins in the early 1980s? They were not that far off what they have been recently. Apple had lower periods, but the company has always been a high margin company. The $2500 Mac in 1984 is like $7000 now. We'll call the $1300 iMac the comparable computer. Would you be willing to spend $7000 for a base model iMac? It might not be that high with developed in-country supply lines, but would certainly be closer to $5000. The $1000 iPhone would easily be $4000.
Thank you and very informative. I like everything except the last part. You could argue technology was as expensive as it was because of supply and demand. Over time, tech usually becomes cheaper (look at TV's)
 
I get what Trump is doing, that is, he shakes people up into action instead of working on a more rational 10-year plan, where he will be out of office, where it could possibly stall along the way, and never happen. The problem is that's the way it goes. It takes a decade or more to make this happen and if you force it, then for sure it will fail. Which is where he's at now.
 
The Qataris give him an aeroplane for $400 million, what's $1 million? Nothing!
I wouldn't be surprised that Agent Orange has enriched himself through his erratic policies and the resulting fluctuating stock market prices.

His great fascist role model from Germany also enriched himself unrestrainedly during his years in power, in the end he was one of the richest men in the country as a former failed painter. This is typical of dictators, they like to line their own pockets until they burst.

Hitler was 56 when he died. Trump is 80 and not a healthy 80. Weekend at Bernie's?

Make of that what you will.
 
While I don’t want to see price hikes on the iPhone because of trade tensions, I’ll agree with Trump on this one. Apple and other companies do need to work out a way to manufacture products in the USA. We need to bring more jobs into the country not push them out.
It is a bit more complicated than that, I am afraid.

I am involved in a B2B business having a lot of business in the US and outside of the US. We have manufacturing on three continents (NA, Europe, Asia). The issue of moving more manufacturing to the US has been on the table.

However, the tariffs need to be very steep before we would do that, because:
  1. Moving production lines is expensive even though we already manufacture products in the US. It is difficult to justify the cost for low-volume products.
  2. As the production is now arranged with efficiency in mind, moving something would make it more costly for the whole company.
  3. In many products we have no US competitors, so the tariffs can just be added to the list price.
  4. US employment costs are rather high even compared to Western Europe especially for white collar workforce. (Modern high-tech production lines employ a lot of engineers.)
  5. Moving final assembly to the US does not help if we need to pay high tariffs on components imported into the US. Final assembly is only a small part of the final cost. Building US-only supply chains is impossible.
The result of all this is that in any case the final price will increase in the US. When POTUS introduced the 20 % (and then 10 %) tariffs, we just added it on our price lists. Our customers did not complain that much, as that was what they expected. Of course, with 50-% tariffs our business will suffer, but so will our customers' business in the US. Free trade and globalization is all about overall efficiency. Tariffs hurt that.

Having said all this, I do agree that there have been trade structures that have not been completely fair. There have been tariffs—such as the stupid story about the Chicken Tax—and trade barriers (including but not limited to agriculture). China has not been playing by the book. These need attention, and unfair practices and rules need to be fixed. Mr. Trump's way of doing it, unfortunately, is very destructive. This game has no winners.
 
I blame much of this on the voters who put him there. So uninformed and easily manipulated, voting against their own self-interest. Not only impacting Apple products and consumer goods, but increased cost of living for everyone, including those depending on social services and healthcare.

Everyone heard about Project 2025. He said he would depot. He talked about tariffs. They got exactly what they voted for
 
It's kind of a shame that the same people who supposedly want to bring manufacturing back to America are so blindly xenophobic that the idea of expediting the immigration process for Chinese engineers would be a laughable prospect at best.

It's almost like the real reason behind these tariff games is completely different than what Trump says.
This is not an easy one, and I would not talk about xenophoby in this context. Mainland Chinese engineers cannot be used in all tasks they would be capable of. There are too many examples of industrial espionage, and the Chinese law supports that.

And, as a European, I strongly discourage the US to attract Indian engineers. We need them here...
 
Yes to both. Have you seen AAPL's performance with all this tariff uncertainty? AAPL is down about 20% year to date. There are the shareholders paying for the tax.



As I showed, shareholders are paying for it. Apple has been eating inflation for years and not passing the costs on to consumers. Look at the cost of the iPhone X in 2018 -- $1000. Look at the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro (which is actually a step up from the iPhone X) in 2024 -- $1000. Apple was able to keep consumer costs the same through supply chain efficiencies and by increasing services, which are high margin.



Do you happen to know Apple's profit margins in the early 1980s? They were not that far off what they have been recently. Apple had lower periods, but the company has always been a high margin company. The $2500 Mac in 1984 is like $7000 now. We'll call the $1300 iMac the comparable computer. Would you be willing to spend $7000 for a base model iMac? It might not be that high with developed in-country supply lines, but would certainly be closer to $5000. The $1000 iPhone would easily be $4000.
Yup, the Se/30 sitting on my desk right now would cost a whopping $17,000 yes you read that right, *seventeen thousand dollars* today adjusted for inflation

Somehow I dont think an imac pro (the best equiv idea I can think of even though they dont currently make ‘em they’re recent enough for this comparison) starting at $17,000 would sell well today
 
  • Like
Reactions: neuropsychguy
... We need to bring more jobs into the country not push them out.
Education, Education, Education, which leads to Innnovation! Innovation! Innovation! It’s a long game but that’s the future.

Instead, Trump is trying to strangle Education so he can wind the clock back to the 1980’s and look relevant again. It’s all about feeding his ego.

The man has no vision. None whatsoever. The future is not the past. The future needs to be invented anew. Yes, it’s hard.
 
Perhaps if America manufactured itself more it could service some of its 35 trillion dollar debt to the rest of the world!.. That soon gets forgotten about eh.

But Trump is doing what he does which is what he says he will do if you elect him. That is a revelation in Politics these days.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.