Trump wants to punish Apple, while admiring his new $400 million dollar bribe from Qatar. 🥴
Oh he will be alive. Neither the Devil (he will fight for the Devil's throne) nor God want him. We're stuck with him on earth unfortunately.Trump has completely lost it.
I don't think Tim should worry too much.
It would be a miracle if Trump is still alive and in power in 6 months.
Don't forget cutting key things most MAGA voters rely on. Let the leopards eat their own faces.Trumps tax and spending bill that got voted through the House yesterday will add trillions to national debt whilst cutting taxes for billionaires 👍
Meanwhile there’s increasingly loud speculation that the reason he keeps making wild economic statements and imposing then removing tariffs is in order to manipulate the markets for personal gain.
He’s not shaking anything up, it’s the biggest shake down of all time. If you thought the country was in a hole before then whoa boy just you wait.
He’s not gonna go away quietly either, him and his acolytes are here to stay.
Yes. In installments.my question is, are the shareholders paying that 25% tax as well? or is it just being passed on to the consumer?
That’s how it works.The threat sent Apple shares tumbling 3% in pre-market trading Friday.
That's because Trump is an empty suit. He's a con artist who spent his whole life building an image of himself that is a complete fabrication. He portrayed himself as a successful businessman while bankrupting companies and stiffing contractors. His most famous book was written by someone else. His most successful project was a television show in which he did what he does best, pretend to be a successful businessman. He doesn't actually know anything about tariffs or the economy and he doesn't much care, just as he doesn't care about conservatism or Republicans or taxes or even immigration. He just wants a throne and a chance to grift lots of money.I initially supported Trump’s tariff policies, hoping they would lead to positive economic changes. However, the results were disappointing. His approach often felt erratic—one day announcing steep tariffs of 125% on certain countries, and the next claiming those countries were pleading with him to reduce them, celebrating what he called a victory.
Then came his comments on the India-Pakistan conflict. He described it as a centuries-old dispute over Kashmir, seemingly unaware that the issue dates back to 1947, when both India gained independence and Pakistan was founded. It was disheartening to hear such inaccuracies, especially from a sitting president. I used to think Americans were simply misinformed when I saw videos suggesting a lack of global awareness, but when the president himself demonstrates such a lack of understanding, it’s hard to stay optimistic.
How's that working out for you?Democrats brought this on themselves, Bernie Sanders even stated so. As a democrat, I voted for trump this round.
And the Chinese, who work for $5 an hour in the factories, are coming along directly? At least until the Americans are trained to the point where they can work as quickly and as cheaply as the Chinese labourers?Does Trump just think a bunch of military helicopters can fly in, latch on some cables and then lift and relocate an overseas manufacturing plant?
Yes… yes he probably does ...
Seriously. You can't feel sorry for these people when they realize all their benefits are going to be cut and they will still be blaming Obama for it.Knife, nose, face.
I agree with most of this here, but what is irritating is you can call it a 25% trump tax all you want, my question is, are the shareholders paying that 25% tax as well? or is it just being passed on to the consumer? Why?
Its not about the tariff to me. Its about who is paying for it. This is a fight between consumers and brand loyalty IMO.
If you want transparency, go ahead and put "Trump tax 25% more expensive so we can continue to be the richest company on the planet because the only person paying for it is you"
I dont think it was American consumers decision to move Apple production to China. It was greed and cheap labor, and now consumers are again expected to pay for it, not the companies profit margin.
Great field to currently be in as he cuts that down to the bone.Medical professional here. I genuinely think he has sundowners, based on the way he talk/posts and when.
The Qataris give him an aeroplane for $400 million, what's $1 million? Nothing!Looks like Tim Apple wasted $1 million payoff to this wannabe mob boss.
Thank you and very informative. I like everything except the last part. You could argue technology was as expensive as it was because of supply and demand. Over time, tech usually becomes cheaper (look at TV's)Yes to both. Have you seen AAPL's performance with all this tariff uncertainty? AAPL is down about 20% year to date. There are the shareholders paying for the tax.
As I showed, shareholders are paying for it. Apple has been eating inflation for years and not passing the costs on to consumers. Look at the cost of the iPhone X in 2018 -- $1000. Look at the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro (which is actually a step up from the iPhone X) in 2024 -- $1000. Apple was able to keep consumer costs the same through supply chain efficiencies and by increasing services, which are high margin.
Do you happen to know Apple's profit margins in the early 1980s? They were not that far off what they have been recently. Apple had lower periods, but the company has always been a high margin company. The $2500 Mac in 1984 is like $7000 now. We'll call the $1300 iMac the comparable computer. Would you be willing to spend $7000 for a base model iMac? It might not be that high with developed in-country supply lines, but would certainly be closer to $5000. The $1000 iPhone would easily be $4000.
The Qataris give him an aeroplane for $400 million, what's $1 million? Nothing!
I wouldn't be surprised that Agent Orange has enriched himself through his erratic policies and the resulting fluctuating stock market prices.
His great fascist role model from Germany also enriched himself unrestrainedly during his years in power, in the end he was one of the richest men in the country as a former failed painter. This is typical of dictators, they like to line their own pockets until they burst.
It is a bit more complicated than that, I am afraid.While I don’t want to see price hikes on the iPhone because of trade tensions, I’ll agree with Trump on this one. Apple and other companies do need to work out a way to manufacture products in the USA. We need to bring more jobs into the country not push them out.
I blame much of this on the voters who put him there. So uninformed and easily manipulated, voting against their own self-interest. Not only impacting Apple products and consumer goods, but increased cost of living for everyone, including those depending on social services and healthcare.
This is not an easy one, and I would not talk about xenophoby in this context. Mainland Chinese engineers cannot be used in all tasks they would be capable of. There are too many examples of industrial espionage, and the Chinese law supports that.It's kind of a shame that the same people who supposedly want to bring manufacturing back to America are so blindly xenophobic that the idea of expediting the immigration process for Chinese engineers would be a laughable prospect at best.
It's almost like the real reason behind these tariff games is completely different than what Trump says.
Yup, the Se/30 sitting on my desk right now would cost a whopping $17,000 yes you read that right, *seventeen thousand dollars* today adjusted for inflationYes to both. Have you seen AAPL's performance with all this tariff uncertainty? AAPL is down about 20% year to date. There are the shareholders paying for the tax.
As I showed, shareholders are paying for it. Apple has been eating inflation for years and not passing the costs on to consumers. Look at the cost of the iPhone X in 2018 -- $1000. Look at the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro (which is actually a step up from the iPhone X) in 2024 -- $1000. Apple was able to keep consumer costs the same through supply chain efficiencies and by increasing services, which are high margin.
Do you happen to know Apple's profit margins in the early 1980s? They were not that far off what they have been recently. Apple had lower periods, but the company has always been a high margin company. The $2500 Mac in 1984 is like $7000 now. We'll call the $1300 iMac the comparable computer. Would you be willing to spend $7000 for a base model iMac? It might not be that high with developed in-country supply lines, but would certainly be closer to $5000. The $1000 iPhone would easily be $4000.
Education, Education, Education, which leads to Innnovation! Innovation! Innovation! It’s a long game but that’s the future.... We need to bring more jobs into the country not push them out.