Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Or even some pro apps like FCP X and, if devs get on board, full photoshop, maya, toon boom, after effects etc etc

With 1 to 2 GBs of ram and no swap file?

Ha.

----------

Hey MR, let's drop the douchiness about the iPad Plus (or Math as you like to call it) being released in early 2015. Apple isn't going to roll something like that out unannounced, and they aren't having two iPad events a couple months apart. Either it makes an appearance tomorrow or we don't see it for another year. It's that simple, and as seasoned Apple watchers you ought to know this.

It'll be announced with the MBA and maybe iWatch. It won't be an "iPad event"
 
A seasoned Apple watcher should know that it is completely possible that it will be released in early 2015 even without a second iPad event. The Apple Watch was announced last month and will be released in early 2015. So it can very well happen that it makes an appearance tomorrow but will not be released for another few months.

That's exactly what he is saying. He means that it either makes an appearance at tomorrow's event and is released in a few months, OR it DOESN'T make an appearance tomorrow, and in that case it will not be released until next year, when it is introduced at the next annual iPad event.
 
I prefer 21:9 film format, currently available to me by purchasing a ticket to the theater, or provided on some BluRay discs.
Some? A quick check of my DVD/Bluray collection yielded more than 60% movies in 21:9.
The point being that 16:9 is certainly appropriate for video, less so for images, may be not so much for anything else that productive people do, i.e. formats are compromises.
True. And 16:9 is in my opinion a really bad compromise for a device like the iPad, unless someone really plans to watch movies on it most of the time. I have a 16:10 monitor at work (where I never watch movies) and a 16:9 monitor at home (where I sometimes watch movies) and for both, I would strongly prefer 4:3, because the 16:x formats yield practically no benefits for any non-movie applications.
 
I can assure you that the iPad Pro will not be marketed towards "pro users" such as professional photographers or video editors to replace their Mac Pro. So the use case you consider to be laughable is not even being considered by Apple.

The average consumer likes that the iPad air or mini is very light and portable, with a 12.9" screen that defeats the purpose and they might as well bring a MacBook air with them

So this is in fact aimed at power or pro users, which again won't work because iOS on the iPad is nothing more then a blown up iPhone interface because Apple gave up on optimizing iOS for iPad a long time ago

Unlike the 6+, no one is looking for a bigger iPad that does the same thing
 
So then the A8X is only for the 12.9" iPad? Thought it was going into the new air also.
 
The Apple watch and the 13" iPad are two products literally nobody ever asked for.

This isn't innovation. It's silliness.
 
The average consumer likes that the iPad air or mini is very light and portable, with a 12.9" screen that defeats the purpose and they might as well bring a MacBook air with them
According to that logic, people could also use a 10" netbook instead of a 10" iPad. Many people don't.
So this is in fact aimed at power or pro users, which again won't work because iOS on the iPad is nothing more then a blown up iPhone interface because Apple gave up on optimizing iOS for iPad a long time ago

I really don't know how anyone would get the idea that a device with a 12.9" screen would be targeted towards "power or pro users". Is the MacBook Air (a device with a more powerful processor) targeted towards power or pro users? No? Ok, then the 12.9" iPad won't be intended for that user group either. Pro users need big screens and lots of computing power. Pro users will start getting excited about an iPad when it has a 27" screen and a quad-core Xeon processor.
 
The average consumer likes that the iPad air or mini is very light and portable, with a 12.9" screen that defeats the purpose and they might as well bring a MacBook air with them

The _average_ consumer. Apple wants to sell hardware to non-average consumers as well. And many people prefer the iPad to a MacBook, even a MacBook Air. If only 5 percent of existing iPad customers and the same number of new customers buy an iPad 13" then it outsells the MBA.

Many people like a 10" iPad. Many like a smaller one. Many like a bigger one.
 
The Apple watch and the 13" iPad are two products literally nobody ever asked for.

I asked for the watch. And I have seen people in the forums who want a 13" iPad. So it is literally quite obvious, that you are literally wrong, according to the literal definition of the word "nobody".
 
Isn't that awkward in portrait mode?

10:16 is pretty awkward, IMO, on larger tablets.
I have some ~10" devices and landscape is much better. Its just too long to hold comfortably. A 12-13" device would be even worse, I imagine, though making it lighter would help.

Anyway, I don't see why 16:10 would be especially desireable unless you mainly want to use it for video (and in that case, why not 16:9?)
 
I really hope TSMC doesn't go bankrupt in the near future. :p

I think we're pretty safe from that happening.TSMC has been in the business of manufacturing semiconductors for a very long time. Longer than Samsung.
 
iOS is laughably limited for a pro user to spend big bucks on an iPad Pro


They would have to introduce major changes, maybe even have OS X on it

I disagree about it being limited for a pro user. But I totally agree with iOS needing an adjustment for such a large screen. Even the 6Plus showed that conventional iOS wasn't ideal with the added space and resolution.

I have a feeling Apple with show what changes they made to iOS when and if they unveil a 12.9" iPad
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.