Yeah... Asking for more robust product is actually less and narrow. No one should ever ask for more or we might upset the phone gods. Shhhh.... Don't request anything more or people's panties will tighten-up and they'll explode.Oh the irony.
Yeah... Asking for more robust product is actually less and narrow. No one should ever ask for more or we might upset the phone gods. Shhhh.... Don't request anything more or people's panties will tighten-up and they'll explode.
You're absolutely right and I have no idea why I bother posting on the forums.well, go ask for it then:
https://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html
probably a tad more effective than battling about it on an internet forum.
good luck.
There’s precedent. Companies are releasing thinner and lighter phones because that’s clearly what the consumer wants and that’s what sells.Glad to know you've done the market research already and you know what would and wouldn't sell. Way to be proactive.
Ah so a few different features and sizes is all that's needed, but that's not narrow. Different needs for different people and precisely why Apple expanded their product line from the original iPhone. I'm talking about a more robust product than what's currently available, about diversification and you have a problem with that. I know a ton of people in the trade industry that would be all over that type of phone.
I hear what you're saying and honestly don't want to continue talking about it. I took the advice above. This will be my last post on the topic.There’s precedent. Companies are releasing thinner and lighter phones because that’s clearly what the consumer wants and that’s what sells.
And there are cases if you want more protection for your phone.
I am not saying that it is wrong to want certain features in a product. I am simply saying that one has to be realistic about the sort of product that Apple can and will feasibly manufacture. And if you know the design idiosyncrasies that Apple has, it’s clear that there are certain design decisions that they will likely never make. A thicker and bulkier product being one of them.
Apple is a company who thrives on manufacturing at scale, and maintaining a fairly slim portfolio of products. They hate buttons and switches and ports and are all about doing more with less.
A product like the S8 active is simply not a design which Apple stands for. That’s what makes Apple so polarising. You either hate or like their design, and they will not cater to the entire market, and everyone knows it.
Made by the Samesung Army, with all the ignorance of the same.
What is your definition of destroyed?
This one is for you...
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/09/25/ios-11-app-slowdowns-performance-issues/
Made by the Samesung Army, with all the ignorance of the same.
It’s not a race for the highest numbers. Samesung needs more “numbers” because it’s devices don’t have the hardware and software integration to need less. Apples devices work better as an integrated software/hardware combination.
No headphone jack is a feature designed to push the limit of what we do. Much like the original iPhone or the removal of old style memory slots.
And I notice faceID is not mentioned. We all know why that is.
Samesung are try hards but don’t have it in them to produce a quality product that is really ground breaking.
I wouldn't define slow responding apps as "destroyed". Especially since the people that are experiencing it will receive a fix for it in later software updates.
Not to mention, I have iOS 11 installed on two 7Plus' and two iPad Pros at my house and neither me or my wife have experienced any of the issues talked about in the article you linked.